Hi Michael,
Starting with utility parts is regular way to implement a new recommendation
specification. But i think, functions is a very practical part. If i finish it
first,may be some guys can go it into service. Months ago,i was working with a
XSLT project based on Xalan, i need some XPath
Hi,
In my plan,i will first implements all the 2.0 functions which do not use
sequences and schema-type,because this job is easy and very practical,may be
some guys and expecting these functions become reality in Xalan, so i will
start here,and call this job step one :)
After finish step one,i wil
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, kesh...@us.ibm.com wrote:
> I'd love to see Xalan tackle it -- but
> Xalan lost its most active contributors a few years ago due
> to time demands
> from Real Jobs, and development slowed down as a result.
...
>
> So... I'd say that if you like the idea,
> you should start d
Implementing 2.0 requires some moderately basic data structure changes to
track Schema types (I believe there's a stub in the code, but not more
than that) and to handle Sequences which aren't simply nodesets. Doable,
but not simple.
I'd love to see Xalan tackle it -- but Xalan lost its most ac
Yeah,if we are only in need of some function not supported by XPath 1.0. We can
resolve it by extension functions.
But,in fact,i think implementing XSLT 2.0 for Xalan is so necessary. XSL
Transformations (XSLT) Version 1.0 specification was finished at 16 Noverber
1999,but this year is 2010, X
