Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> I think Ronald Bourret has a lot of influence in this regard. He could
> probably give XML:DB a little more importance in the next revisions of
> his site. If you agree, Ronald
Sorry to have taken so long to reply to this.
I've added links to the XML:DB API in a coupl
> > I will also publish my set of JUnit tests for XML:DB.
> >
>
> Are these all new tests or did you build off the ones in CVS?
These are my own tests, independent of the ones in CVS.
Jeremias Märki
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OUTLINE AG
Postfach 3954 - Rhynauerstr. 15 - CH-6002 Luzern
Fon +41 (4
On Monday, July 23, 2001, at 08:16 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Maybe it's necessary to go and knock on other XML database developer's
doors to ask them to provide an implementation of XML:DB. It was quite
impressive how little time it took me to create an XML:DB layer on top
of JDBC.
Is the code/bi
> > Maybe it's necessary to go and knock on other XML database developer's
> > doors to ask them to provide an implementation of XML:DB. It was quite
> > impressive how little time it took me to create an XML:DB layer on top
> > of JDBC.
>
> Is the code/binary for this impl something you can make
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001 09:23:35 +0200
Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A couple points here. First the API is still evolving and in fact is
> > really due for another revision so the docs are definitely not complete.
>
> I agree. I get the impression that very few people are really
> > Maybe it's necessary to go and knock on other XML database developer's
> > doors to ask them to provide an implementation of XML:DB. It was quite
> > impressive how little time it took me to create an XML:DB layer on top
> > of JDBC.
>
> Is the code/binary for this impl something you can make
On Monday, July 16, 2001, at 12:23 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
A couple points here. First the API is still evolving and in fact is
really due for another revision so the docs are definitely not complete.
I agree. I get the impression that very few people are really
participating in the defition of
> A couple points here. First the API is still evolving and in fact is
> really due for another revision so the docs are definitely not complete.
I agree. I get the impression that very few people are really
participating in the defition of the API. I'd like to encourage
implementors and users o
On Thursday, July 12, 2001, at 11:48 PM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Hi all
Yesterday, I posted a bug report for dbXML stating that Resources
returned by XPathQueryService return no ID to the source document. Tom
Bradford explained to me, that this behaviour is by design.
I hope you, Tom, don't mind m
