On Mon, 1 Feb 2010, Chuck Byam wrote:
There was a problem with a symbolic link while trying to
"beautify" urls. I think it's fixed now.
Thanks!
1) While we have your attention, can we do something about the spam
problem that has occurred irregularly since the last Wiki tweaks?
We evidently h
On Feb 1, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Tom Russo wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 08:56:38AM -0700, we recorded a bogon-computron
> collision of the flavor, containing:
>> On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 10:18:43AM -0500, we recorded a bogon-computron
>> collision of the flavor, containing:
>>>
>>> On Jan 31,
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 08:56:38AM -0700, we recorded a bogon-computron
collision of the flavor, containing:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 10:18:43AM -0500, we recorded a bogon-computron
> collision of the flavor, containing:
> >
> > On Jan 31, 2010, at 6:59 PM, Curt, WE7U wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 10:18:43AM -0500, we recorded a bogon-computron
collision of the flavor, containing:
>
> On Jan 31, 2010, at 6:59 PM, Curt, WE7U wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 31 Jan 2010, Tom Hayward wrote:
> >
> >>> In fact, checking the stylehseets (specifically the one being
> >>> used calle
On Jan 31, 2010, at 6:59 PM, Curt, WE7U wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Jan 2010, Tom Hayward wrote:
>
>>> In fact, checking the stylehseets (specifically the one being
>>> used called skins/modern/main.css) there is an entry for the PRE
>>> tag which is adding 0.4em of padding around the lines. Try
>>> ch
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010, Tom Hayward wrote:
In fact, checking the stylehseets (specifically the one being
used called skins/modern/main.css) there is an entry for the PRE
tag which is adding 0.4em of padding around the lines. Try
changing that padding to zero and see what happens.
Considering tha
> In fact, checking the stylehseets (specifically the one being used called
> skins/modern/main.css) there is an entry for the PRE tag which is adding
> 0.4em of padding around the lines. Try changing that padding to zero and see
> what happens.
Not quite...
This section adds padding around t
They don't appear to be extra blank lines (Firefox says both pages are using
one line per line of text). However, it might be due to the style sheet
declaring the lines taller for the Xastir Wiki versus the SourceForge one.
In fact, checking the stylehseets (specifically the one being used call
