I guess that you forgot to CC: the list, so doing that now.
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 16:07 +, John Tapsell wrote:
Hi,
Could you please put on the wiki what the status of this proposal
is. What release of Gnome/KDE use it? Or is it only the distro's
What proposal?
that should care?
Hi Bastien,
Huh. It's a software announcement. Pretty much every Free Unix desktop
project uses it, and distros and users should probably all upgrade to
that version...
Okay. You know that. Most people here know that. Yet if you go to
http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Standards it's under:
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 10:05, John Tapsell wrote:
Draft specifications that are new and not yet widely used, though
they may be used by one or more desktops or desktop applications:
With no indication anywhere whether everyone uses it or nobody uses.
did you see my recent posting to this
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:05:05 +, John Tapsell wrote:
Hi Bastien,
Huh. It's a software announcement. Pretty much every Free Unix desktop
project uses it, and distros and users should probably all upgrade to
that version...
Okay. You know that. Most people here know that. Yet if you
I have a concern about autoopen in the autostart-spec. I'll start with
a quote:
The relative path MUST NOT point to an executable file. ... If the
relative path points to an executable file then the desktop environment
MUST NOT execute the file.
I don't know exactly how Windows-free you guys
Current issues keeping this as 'draft' are:
* The Desktop Base Directory Specification, which this relies on, is
still a draft.
Can we add:
* Integration with icon themes has not been finalised
(and is not currently part of the specification).
to that list? :)
It's