hello ...
i'm currently tracking no less than three different specifications:
* visual notifications
* icon naming
* (and as of today) default/preferred apps
i expect to see at least two new specs added from the kde side this year:
* notification area specification
* wallpaper packaging
Hey,
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009 10:17:43 -0600
Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote:
however, it only has value if people use it, to state the absolutely
obvious. i stopped pushing this forward shortly after my last attempt
to get it going due to the complete lack of interest shown by people
on this
On Monday 08 June 2009, Jannis Pohlmann wrote:
first of all, I'd also like to see a repository like this for all the
fd.o specifications. But why not host it on git.freedesktop.org? Are
the admins not responsive enough?
i'd be happy to see this on git.fd.o
but i didn't feel like wading
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 19:11 +0200, Jannis Pohlmann wrote:
But why not host it on git.freedesktop.org? Are
the admins not responsive enough? Also, I see little point in a
repository that doesn't contain *all* the specifications.
Same problems also are emerging on Xesam list, where we are
Hello everyone, I would like to start a discussion about the status
icons for chat programs
Currently the icon naming spec includes those:
- user-away The icon used when a user on a chat network is away from
their keyboard and the chat program.
- user-idle The icon used when a
On Monday 08 June 2009, Nicolò Chieffo wrote:
In my opinion a status is currently missing: d-n-d.
In KDE's Oxygen, we have user-busy for that. So +1 for getting an icon with
this purpose into the spec, it's commonly used by all kinds of messaging apps.
Another useful icon for new protocols is
On Monday 08 June 2009, Roberto Guido wrote:
Is it a problem about lack of resources? Is it a problem about lack of
man power? Is it a problem about governance?
it's a bit of all three, i think, with the first two contributing to (though
not solely responsible for) the third.
however, since
Am Sonntag, den 07.06.2009, 16:28 +0100 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
On Sun, 2009-06-07 at 14:00 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 07.06.2009, 12:50 +0100 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
On Sun, 2009-06-07 at 13:52 +0800, PCMan wrote:
Hi list,
To solve the issue that every desktop
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 02:24 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 07.06.2009, 16:28 +0100 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
snip
Yes, but we'd still be missing metadata to tell us how to construct the
commands to launch those mailers with attachments.
Why not adopt Xfce's approach?
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 01:44:05 +0100
Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net wrote:
I only mentioned Thunar as an example, because it's usage of the fdo
specs for the send to menu IMO is very clean and simple.
You still haven't explained what Thunar does that nautilus-sendto (or
nautilus) would
Christoph Wickert wrote:
Just drop a
desktop file in /usr/share/Thunar/sendto and you are ready to go. I
don't know a file manager that offers similar functionality and IMO this
should be a standard feature across all desktops
+1
IMHO, panel menus should follow the same sub-directory method
On Monday 08 June 2009, Manu wrote:
Christoph Wickert wrote:
Just drop a
desktop file in /usr/share/Thunar/sendto and you are ready to go. I
don't know a file manager that offers similar functionality and IMO this
should be a standard feature across all desktops
+1
IMHO, panel menus
Am Dienstag, den 09.06.2009, 01:44 +0100 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 02:24 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 07.06.2009, 16:28 +0100 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
snip
Yes, but we'd still be missing metadata to tell us how to construct the
commands to launch
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 22:26 -0700, Corbin Simpson wrote:
As somebody who can't keep his mouth shut, would any of the following be
interesting/Oh hey, you'll talk about it? Then I don't have to!:
I'm supposed to be emceeing this event, not doing a solo...
- omapfb, DSS/DSS2, and why embedded
14 matches
Mail list logo
