On Monday 18 April 2011, Vincent Untz wrote:
FWIW, I'd consider ./ to be relative to the path defined in the Path
key (which could be ./ to tell that it's the base directory of the
.desktop file).
From a KDE point of view: I support these additions to the desktop entry spec
and I volunteer to
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 11:58 +0200, David Faure wrote:
On Monday 18 April 2011, Vincent Untz wrote:
FWIW, I'd consider ./ to be relative to the path defined in the Path
key (which could be ./ to tell that it's the base directory of the
.desktop file).
From a KDE point of view: I support
On Thursday 23 June 2011, Michael Thayer wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 11:58 +0200, David Faure wrote:
On Monday 18 April 2011, Vincent Untz wrote:
FWIW, I'd consider ./ to be relative to the path defined in the Path
key (which could be ./ to tell that it's the base directory of the
On 06/23/2011 06:47 AM, David Faure wrote:
On Thursday 23 June 2011, Michael Thayer wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 11:58 +0200, David Faure wrote:
On Monday 18 April 2011, Vincent Untz wrote:
FWIW, I'd consider ./ to be relative to the path defined in the Path
key (which could be ./ to tell
On Thursday 23 June 2011, Marty Jack wrote:
I continue to oppose this. As I understand it, the intended use is for
installation kits similar to how Autorun works on Windows.
I would also refer everyone to the Autostart spec
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 9:06 PM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
On Thursday 23 June 2011, Marty Jack wrote:
I continue to oppose this. As I understand it, the intended use is for
installation kits similar to how Autorun works on Windows.
I would also refer everyone to the Autostart spec
For example, maybe a script can have an embedded icon like this:
#/bin/sh
#xdg_icon=
AAAFCAYAAACNbyblHElEQVQI12P4//8/w38GIAXDIBKE0DHxgljNBAAO
9TXL0Y4OHwBJRU5ErkJggg==
This is the data url scheme used by browsers.
Then a file manger can
On Thursday 23 June 2011, you wrote:
If you just want to give the script an icon, you can embed
the icon in the script, and write a thumbnailer for it.
IMHO, having run_me.sh in the folder is enough.
Having run_me.sh, run_me.desktop, and run_me.png in the folder
won't increase usability.
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 15:30 +0200, David Faure wrote:
On Thursday 23 June 2011, you wrote:
If you just want to give the script an icon, you can embed
the icon in the script, and write a thumbnailer for it.
IMHO, having run_me.sh in the folder is enough.
Having run_me.sh, run_me.desktop,
