Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/xdoclet/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=XDT-305
Here is an overview of the issue:
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/xdoclet/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=XDT-304
Here is an overview of the issue:
I'm not sure what changed to fix this, but have a look at my latest
creation. This is an effort I'm spearheading to get Ant's
documentation generated by XDoclet. Actually the goal is much more
than documentation - think task descriptors, type descriptors, and
task/type mapping properties
Sorry guys.. How I can remove this xdt ?
-antonio
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:46 PM
Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] [XDoclet JIRA] Created: (XDT-303) local-facade
> Message:
>
> A new issue
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/xdoclet/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=XDT-303
Here is an overview of the issue:
James Taylor wrote:
As an aside, are you familiar with docutils / reStructuredText
(http://docutils.sf.net)? It is similar to aptdoc but is not indentation
sensitive (which I hate) and quite a bit more powerful. The gzz project
(http://gzz.info) uses it with jython for their documentation. I've b
> > 1) Will maven-aptdoc-plugin show up anywhere else soon? (Maybe as part of
> > APT itself?)
Hopefuly it can be put into another CVS repository, perhaps
maven-plugins.sf.net
Going into APT itself is not a possibility. The APT author is no longer
interested in maintaining it (likely too busy wi
From: "Aslak Hellesøy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> According to the ASF license I have to preserve that license in the
> maven-aptdoc-plugin source code. If we import the maven-aptdoc-plugin
as-is
> into XDoclet's CVS without any changes to the license or package names,
> would this be a problem?.
Sound
Update of /cvsroot/xdoclet/xdoclet2/aptdocs
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv21983/aptdocs
Added Files:
build.apt
Log Message:
new
--- NEW FILE: build.apt ---
--
Build
-
Update of /cvsroot/xdoclet/xdoclet2/core
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv11344/core
Modified Files:
maven.xml
Log Message:
Added clover to the build
Index: maven.xml
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/xdoclet/xdoclet2/core/maven.x
Update of /cvsroot/xdoclet/xdoclet2/core/src/java/xdoclet/generators
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv11560/core/src/java/xdoclet/generators
Modified Files:
JellyGenerator.java VelocityGenerator.java
Log Message:
Javadocs
Index: JellyGenerator.java
==
Update of /cvsroot/xdoclet/xdoclet2
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv10518
Modified Files:
TODO.txt
Log Message:
Added more TODOs
Index: TODO.txt
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/xdoclet/xdoclet2/TODO.txt,v
retrieving revision 1.
> > 3) Do you (Jakarta/Maven team) have any objections to the XDoclet team
> > keeping maven-aptdoc-plugin in XDoclet's CVS until you resolve your
> > licensing issues yourself?
>
> None at all I'd have thought. The Maven team just wants folks to
> be able to
> build their stuff - though we are res
--- Antonio Kantek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In my project, EJB Container and Web Container
> runs in the same JVM. Remote-Facade writted by
> Konstantin Pribluda is very nice. I have writted a
> Local-Facade, a clone of Remote-Facade but local
> (obvious :) ). I now, in general pu
Hi,
In my project, EJB Container and
Web Container runs in the same JVM. Remote-Facade writted by Konstantin Pribluda
is very nice. I have writted a Local-Facade, a clone of Remote-Facade but local
(obvious :) ). I now, in general purposes this is not much useful.. but that
is...
cha
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 12. februar 2003 09:57
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] APT plugin
>
>
> Aslak Hellesøy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 12.02.2003,
> 02:50:32:
> > (cc
From: "Aslak Hellesøy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> (cc to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - please reply only to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
> I see the (excellent) aptdoc plugin has just been deleted from Maven's
HEAD
> because of LGPL issues (see http://tinyurl.com/5p17 and
> http://tinyurl.com/5p2f).
>
> The aptconvert
oh yeah, the featured documentation kicks ass :), the tag descriptions are
just not there :(
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Marcus
Brito
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 3:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] Value ob
Jeff Gregory wrote:
When is the value object documentation excepted to be complete?
"When it's done". In other words... when I or someone else has time to
finish it. As a side note, I think the current state of the VO
documentation is pretty good.
--
MB
---
The following issue has been updated:
Updater: Laurent Etiemble (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 3:50 AM
Comment:
Hi again,
I have shipped the wrong version of the XDoclet Core "plugin.xml" file. EJB generation
is broken because "ejb.jar" is required to be on the
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/xdoclet/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=XDT-302
Here is an overview of the issue:
Aslak Hellesøy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 12.02.2003,
02:50:32:
> (cc to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - please reply only to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
> I see the (excellent) aptdoc plugin has just been deleted from Maven's HEAD
> because of LGPL issues (see http://tinyurl.com/5p17 and
> http://tinyurl.com/
22 matches
Mail list logo
