Re: [Xdoclet-devel] APT plugin

2003-02-12 Thread Colin Sampaleanu
James Taylor wrote: As an aside, are you familiar with docutils / reStructuredText (http://docutils.sf.net)? It is similar to aptdoc but is not indentation sensitive (which I hate) and quite a bit more powerful. The gzz project (http://gzz.info) uses it with jython for their documentation. I've b

Re: [Xdoclet-devel] APT plugin

2003-02-12 Thread James Taylor
> > 1) Will maven-aptdoc-plugin show up anywhere else soon? (Maybe as part of > > APT itself?) Hopefuly it can be put into another CVS repository, perhaps maven-plugins.sf.net Going into APT itself is not a possibility. The APT author is no longer interested in maintaining it (likely too busy wi

Re: [Xdoclet-devel] APT plugin

2003-02-12 Thread James Strachan
From: "Aslak Hellesøy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > According to the ASF license I have to preserve that license in the > maven-aptdoc-plugin source code. If we import the maven-aptdoc-plugin as-is > into XDoclet's CVS without any changes to the license or package names, > would this be a problem?. Sound

RE: [Xdoclet-devel] APT plugin

2003-02-12 Thread Aslak Hellesøy
> > 3) Do you (Jakarta/Maven team) have any objections to the XDoclet team > > keeping maven-aptdoc-plugin in XDoclet's CVS until you resolve your > > licensing issues yourself? > > None at all I'd have thought. The Maven team just wants folks to > be able to > build their stuff - though we are res

RE: [Xdoclet-devel] APT plugin

2003-02-12 Thread Aslak Hellesøy
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 12. februar 2003 09:57 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] APT plugin > > > Aslak Hellesøy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrie

Re: [Xdoclet-devel] APT plugin

2003-02-12 Thread James Strachan
From: "Aslak Hellesøy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > (cc to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - please reply only to > [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > I see the (excellent) aptdoc plugin has just been deleted from Maven's HEAD > because of LGPL issues (see http://tinyurl.com/5p17 and > http://tinyurl.com/5p2f). > > The aptconvert

Re: [Xdoclet-devel] APT plugin

2003-02-12 Thread infomail
Aslak Hellesøy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 12.02.2003, 02:50:32: > (cc to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - please reply only to > [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > I see the (excellent) aptdoc plugin has just been deleted from Maven's HEAD > because of LGPL issues (see http://tinyurl.com/5p17 and > http://tinyurl.com/

[Xdoclet-devel] APT plugin

2003-02-11 Thread Aslak Hellesøy
(cc to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - please reply only to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) I see the (excellent) aptdoc plugin has just been deleted from Maven's HEAD because of LGPL issues (see http://tinyurl.com/5p17 and http://tinyurl.com/5p2f). The aptconvert jars at ibiblio are still there: http://www.ibiblio.org/m