Blame Google
http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=unmodifiableCollection&btnI=I'm+Feeling+Lucky&meta=
;-)
If it's standard Collections stuff, forget I said anything...
Andrew.
On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 05:32, Matthias Germann wrote:
> IMHO, he would like to use the java.util.Collections class to g
IMHO, he would like to use the java.util.Collections class to get
unmodifiable Collections and not the commons-collections library.
Regards,
Mathhias
Andrew Stevens schrieb:
On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 21:17, Ward, Tyler wrote:
As a result, I made the following changes.
...
4) All returned [Collection
On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 21:17, Ward, Tyler wrote:
> As a result, I made the following changes.
> ...
> 4) All returned [Collection|Set]s are
> Collections.unmodifiable[Collection|Set](...).
> 5) Added get*Collection() method that returns unmodifiable [Collection|Set]
> of the relations.
Unmodifia
It seems that the ejb value objects are somewhat incomplete.
Therefore, I have taken it upon myself to do some work on them. There are a few
flaws that I see in the value objects now.
1) No synchronization. It is likely that under some situations it would be nice
to be able to turn on synchr
