Silly mistake :-) Corrected.
Ara.
> -Original Message-
> From: Konstantin Priblouda [mailto:kpriblouda@;yahoo.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:34 PM
> To: Ara Abrahamian
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] xrai
>
>
> --- Ara A
--- Ara Abrahamian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See the target/test-report folder. What's there?
--%<
Testsuite: xdoclet.xrai.ant.TestAttributesTask
Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed:
0.345 sec
Testcase: testSerializationDeserialization took 0.212
sec
FAIL
See the target/test-report folder. What's there?
Ara.
> -Original Message-
> From: Konstantin Priblouda [mailto:kpriblouda@;yahoo.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:18 PM
> To: Ara Abrahamian
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] xrai
>
--- Ara Abrahamian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I haven't had time to look at it in detail, but I
> have some comments
> about
> > style:
> > 1) The test class is named TestAttributesTask. I
> believe
> > AttributesTaskTest
> > is a more common naming convention for JUnit.
>
> OK. I'll change i
> I haven't had time to look at it in detail, but I have some comments
about
> style:
> 1) The test class is named TestAttributesTask. I believe
> AttributesTaskTest
> is a more common naming convention for JUnit.
OK. I'll change it.
> 3) The AttributeSerializerTask seems to have a lot of logic.
> We can use PMD to enforce this convention...
> ( or at least to croak loud )
yeah... I suppose I was just letting my mind think of further steps (o:
cheers
dim
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://th
--- Dmitri Colebatch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's not extension, it's coding convention...
> > I find this is usefull, because you can easily
> tell
> > class members from method locals.
>
> yeah, but we run pretty to enforce formatting, it
> would be feasible to have
> something that enfo
w of (o:
cheers
dim
>
> Aslak
>
> Dmitri Colebatch wrote:
>
> > From: "Dmitri Colebatch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > "Aslak_Hellesoy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] xrai
>
Tree comparator? Pretty? You lost me completely on this one Dim.
Did you hit reply on the wrong mail?
Aslak
Dmitri Colebatch wrote:
From: "Dmitri Colebatch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Aslak_Hellesoy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re:
build yes? obviously a
> > hefty extension (o: but really thats all it is...
> >
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Konstantin Priblouda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Aslak_Hellesoy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
OTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:17 PM
> Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] xrai
>
>
> >
> > > As you've seen (in xjavadoc) I'm using
> > > _underscorePrefixedVariableNames.
> > > This is to be abl
ROTECTED]>
To: "Aslak_Hellesoy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:17 PM
Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] xrai
>
> > As you've seen (in xjavadoc) I'm using
> > _underscorePrefixedVariableNames.
> > This is t
> As you've seen (in xjavadoc) I'm using
> _underscorePrefixedVariableNames.
> This is to be able to distinguish class members from
> method parameters and
> local variables. Do you think that's a good or bad
> convention? We should
> agree on a coding convention.
+1000
This is really good conven
Nice work Ara!
I have been asking for a feature in Nanning, but now that XRAI is here, I'll
pass it over to you ;-)
http://tinyurl.com/2mcj
XRAI comes in very handy right now. It will play an important role in the
new xdoclet2 core I think!
I haven't had time to look at it in detail, but I have
14 matches
Mail list logo
