Hi,
I plan to give developer access to Anton Adamansky, who provided
the Java 5 compliance of Xjavadoc (XJD-41).
Heiko
--
Heiko W.Rupp http://www.pilhuhn.de/hwr/ http://mcntp.sf.net/
JBoss Buch: http://www.dpunkt.de/buch/3-89864-318-2.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signa
+1 from me.
Cheers,
René
xdoclet-devel@lists.sourceforge.net schrieb am 13.06.05 10:00:20:
>
> Hi,
>
> I plan to give developer access to Anton Adamansky, who provided
> the Java 5 compliance of Xjavadoc (XJD-41).
>
> Heiko
>
> --
> Heiko W.Rupp http://www.pilhuhn.de/hwr/ http://mc
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Jan Peter Stotz
Created: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 4:11 AM
Body:
Oh no, not just a little typo! Little cause with huge effect
I beg your pardon. Thank you for your effort.
Looks like this issue is now obsolete.
Jan
--
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 08:56, Heiko W. Rupp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I plan to give developer access to Anton Adamansky, who provided
> the Java 5 compliance of Xjavadoc (XJD-41).
>
> Heiko
Assuming he plans to continue to contribute, then +1.
Anton, care to introduce yourself for the benefit of those
On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 10:07, Heiko W. Rupp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am just looking at XJD-41. The patch from Anton Adamansky looks
> quite good.
> I propose - when this one is applied to name the next Xjavadoc
> version 1.5 instead of 1.2 to show JDK1.5 support in the name.
>
> Opinions?
>
> Heiko
The following issue has been updated:
Updater: Andrew Stevens (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 6:50 PM
Changes:
Version changed to 1.2.2
Component changed to Build Process
