> OK. I see. But what about merging xdoclet.codehaus and xdoclet-plugins
> project??
Like I said before, developers of core xdoclet and plugins are meant
to be different people (and more numerous on plugins)
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored
--- Anatol Pomozov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > XDoclet and generama are pretty stable.
> But there is a lot of space where this projects can
> be developed. I
> wish Generama have several addition features
> (validation and 'force
> generation' some of them). But seems that Generama
> developer
> XDoclet and generama are pretty stable.
But there is a lot of space where this projects can be developed. I
wish Generama have several addition features (validation and 'force
generation' some of them). But seems that Generama developers are
inactive.
> As Greg said, generama is used elsewhere.
--- Anatol Pomozov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the main reason of breaking xdoclet
> sourcecode into 3
> projects: Generama, XDoclet and xdoclet-plugins??
> Is it REALLY different projects?? Or it is a just
> modules of one
> project??? It is really needed to have 6 maillist
> which are
For what I know,
* generama is meant to be used by other projects, middlegen being one of them
* the plugins are a separate project, to allow more developpers to
join in. Also, it was foreseen that vendor specific plugins would be
maintained by "vendors", not 3rd parties.
On 23/05/05, Anatol Pomo
