Alright that makes sense. I have not used singleton="true" in my spring
annotations and you suggestion is definitely good and safe guard procedure.
thanks
Subu
Haroon Rafique wrote:
>
> On Today at 4:40pm, S=>SubuA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> S>
> S> Hi Haroon,
> S> hmm I didnt get that
On Today at 4:40pm, S=>SubuA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
S>
S> Hi Haroon,
S> hmm I didnt get that singleton exception like you mentioned. As mentioned I
S> just copied the orginal xdt definiton and replace the header with the
S> definition with what I want and it worked.
S> here is what I did:
S>
Hi Haroon,
hmm I didnt get that singleton exception like you mentioned. As mentioned I
just copied the orginal xdt definiton and replace the header with the
definition with what I want and it worked.
here is what I did:
so I am not sure how you got that excpetion?
Cheers,
Subu
Haroon Rafique w
Hi Haroon,
It works! what I did was replace
"
default-lazy-init=""
default-dependency-check=""
with
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
xmlns:aop="http://www.springframework.org/schema/aop";
xmlns:tx="ht
On Today at 5:18pm, HR=>Haroon Rafique <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
HR>
HR>
HR> singleton=" paramName="singleton" values="true,false" default="true"/>"
HR>
HR>
HR> I don't have enough brain cells left for the day to figure out how the
HR> corresponding scope attribute should be specif
On Today at 3:04pm, HR=>Haroon Rafique <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
HR> Let me know how it works out.
HR>
Problems already. You will run into the problem that the singleton
attribute is not allowed on the tag in the 2.0 xsd (it was allowed
in the DTD). So, you will be mucking around with XDt te
On Yesterday at 4:03pm, S=>SubuA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
S> [..snip..]
S>
S> Spring doclet defiition in our pom.xml:
S> destdir="target/abc-resources"
S> excludedtags="@version,@author,@todo,@see,@desc" verbose="true" force="true"
S> addedTags="">
S>
S>
