e to leave out the 's'.
>
> Heiko
>
>
>
>
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] im Auftrag von
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mo 04.10.2004 14:30
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: Re: [Xdoclet-user] value-object and "almost" self-ref
So if the described 'offspring' valueobject
compiles fine, then no objection from my side to
leave out the 's'.
Heiko
Von:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] im Auftrag von
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Gesendet: Mo 04.10.2004 14:30An:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Betreff: Re: [Xdoclet-user]
value-object and &quo
I have updated the document a bit.
(still not final though).
I also conducted tests over the code it contains, and everything seems fine.
Stefan
value objects and self reference.
We want to answer the following question : "how do I represent a tree-like structure
with entity EJB and value-o
ncorrect to append an 's' to the method name.
>
> Phil Bowker
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Stefan Champailler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 10/04/2004 01:30 PM
> Please respond to xdoclet-user
>
>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gt;
>
>
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] im Auftrag von Stefan
> Champailler Gesendet: Mo 04.10.2004 11:58
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: Re: [Xdoclet-user] value-object and "almost" self-reference
>
>
>
> Here's a first cut.
gt;
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10/04/2004 01:30 PM
Please respond to xdoclet-user
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-user] value-object and "almost" self-reference
Well :)
If it's better from the english grammar po
Title: Re: [Xdoclet-user] value-object and "almost" self-reference
If xdoclet generates methods
for Collections, then normally an 's' is appended.
So, code without the 's' might not
work.
YMMV
Heiko
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] im
Auftrag von Stefan Champail
't it be
> getOffsprings()?
>
>
>
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] im Auftrag von Stefan
> Champailler Gesendet: Mo 04.10.2004 11:58
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: Re: [Xdoclet-user] value-object and "almost" self-reference
>
>
>
> Here'
Title: Re: [Xdoclet-user] value-object and "almost" self-reference
Hi,
looks good. But shouldn't it
be
getOffsprings()?
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] im
Auftrag von Stefan ChampaillerGesendet: Mo 04.10.2004
11:58An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Betreff: Re:
[Xdoclet-user] value-object an
on the web site.
>
> Heiko
>
>
>
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] im Auftrag von Stefan
> Champailler Gesendet: Mo 04.10.2004 09:34
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: Re: [Xdoclet-user] value-object and "almost" self-reference
>
>
>
>
Title: Re: [Xdoclet-user] value-object and "almost" self-reference
Hi,
go for it :-)
If you do it fast enough, it will be
included in the 1.2.2 release and be put up on the
web site.
Heiko
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] im
Auftrag von Stefan ChampaillerGesendet: Mo 04.10.200
Ooops,
it seems I didn't read the documentation enough... The solution is explained
in "Exposing Generated Methods" of the "Using Value Objects" document. Just
had to expose the missign interface.
Since I've serached a lot for that little info, I thought it'd be nice to have
a small paragraph
12 matches
Mail list logo
