>> As reported earlier, I have been using 2.6.38-0.rc2.git3.2.xendom0.fc15
>> with good results. One thing I have come across is that power management
>> does not seem to work. For example, "pm-suspend" does not suspend my
>> system. Instead, the system merely becomes unresponsive. On the other
>>
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, W. Michael Petullo wrote:
> As reported earlier, I have been using 2.6.38-0.rc2.git3.2.xendom0.fc15
> with good results. One thing I have come across is that power management
> does not seem to work. For example, "pm-suspend" does not suspend my
> system. Instead, the system m
As reported earlier, I have been using 2.6.38-0.rc2.git3.2.xendom0.fc15
with good results. One thing I have come across is that power management
does not seem to work. For example, "pm-suspend" does not suspend my
system. Instead, the system merely becomes unresponsive. On the other
hand, 2.6.32.26
Now, the last issue remaining for me is the backend drivers. My
understanding is that, in the absence of backends being accepted
upstream, we can use QEMU-based drivers. This would be acceptable for
our work. Has anyone been using these with Fedora 15?
>>> In theory the block d
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 05:03:57PM -0600, W. Michael Petullo wrote:
> >> Now, the last issue remaining for me is the backend drivers. My
> >> understanding is that, in the absence of backends being accepted
> >> upstream, we can use QEMU-based drivers. This would be acceptable for
> >> our work. Ha
