On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 05:27:08PM -0400, Shriram Rajagopalan wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <
> konrad.w...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> > Hey,
> >
> > There has been some discussion about EFI and SecureBoot and such.
> >
> > Most of the time I get questions in the form
On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 17:47 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > Is the fact that Fedora release guidelines include Xen _guest_ support
> > but not full _host_ functionalities going to be an issue if/when we
> > decide to try influencing this
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SecureBoot ?
>
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 10:21 +0100, M A Young wrote:
> > Is the fact that Fedora release guidelines include Xen _guest_ support
> > but not full _host_ functionalities going to be an issue if/when we
> > decide to try influencing this
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SecureBoot ?
>
> In
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 11:04 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
Ok, so, should we be concerned? Is there something we can/should do
about that? How do you think we can help in having xen being considered?
First the Linux kernel running under EFI has
