On Thu, 20 Jan 2011, Bill McGonigle wrote:
On 11/07/2010 03:55 PM, M A Young wrote:
If the plan to get key
xen drivers into 2.6.38 succeeds
With the caveat that I don't really know what I'm looking for, I didn't see
these make 2.6.38-rc1 (plenty of other Xen work, though). I saw a
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 09:47:43AM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 09:34:50PM -0500, Bill McGonigle wrote:
On 11/07/2010 03:55 PM, M A Young wrote:
If the plan to get key
xen drivers into 2.6.38 succeeds
With the caveat that I don't really know what I'm looking
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 08:39:46AM +, M A Young wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011, Bill McGonigle wrote:
On 11/07/2010 03:55 PM, M A Young wrote:
If the plan to get key
xen drivers into 2.6.38 succeeds
With the caveat that I don't really know what I'm looking for, I didn't see
these
On 11/07/2010 03:55 PM, M A Young wrote:
If the plan to get key
xen drivers into 2.6.38 succeeds
With the caveat that I don't really know what I'm looking for, I didn't
see these make 2.6.38-rc1 (plenty of other Xen work, though). I saw a
proposed patch for netback hit xen-devel yesterday.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 09:34:50PM -0500, Bill McGonigle wrote:
On 11/07/2010 03:55 PM, M A Young wrote:
If the plan to get key
xen drivers into 2.6.38 succeeds
With the caveat that I don't really know what I'm looking for, I didn't
see these make 2.6.38-rc1 (plenty of other Xen work,
Dear Santa,
I don't have much, but I am willing to give up any and all of my Christmas
presents if you can see your way to bring Christmas to a boy in the UK. You
see, they have even less there in the UK - surveillance cameras everywhere to
make sure they keep in line and boiled gruel twice a
+1
--
xen mailing list
xen@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Digimer li...@alteeve.com wrote:
On 10-11-09 11:49 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
AFAIK there are some issues with that benchmark not being free.
What I'm basically looking for is a simple comparison of a few key metrics
between common setups. For example a
On 10-11-12 09:57 AM, Todd Deshane wrote:
I'd be happy to run some benchmarks. I've got some identical (if humble)
machines... Would you want just a Xen vs. KVM? If so, what parameters or
setup options would provide the best apples to apples comparison?
The machines are;
- quad core athlon
Config (.config) might be different for pvops kernel running as vanilla or
under xen.
Boris.
--- On Wed, 11/10/10, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [fedora-virt] [Fedora-xen] Dom0 xen support in Fedora 15?
To: Richard W.M
On 11/09/10 20:44, M A Young wrote:
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, Don Dutile wrote:
IMO, the pieces that the Xen folks have to whip into shape are the tools;
the missing kernel pieces are fairly well known (backend drivers), although
Xen folks
are considering blkback in userspace instead of kernel
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 09:55:19AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 10:40:10AM -0800, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
And I would hope that the installer would be clever enough to see if KVM
is supported and offer xen if not. Doesn't need to be default, available
is
Exactly, i only need on Fedora :)
# yum install kernel-xen
Boris.
--- On Wed, 11/10/10, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [fedora-virt] [Fedora-xen] Dom0 xen support in Fedora 15?
To: Boris Derzhavets bderzhav...@yahoo.com
Cc
Digimer wrote:
On 10-11-09 11:49 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
AFAIK there are some issues with that benchmark not being free.
What I'm basically looking for is a simple comparison of a few key metrics
between common setups. For example a simple bonnie++ run on XenPV and
Dor Laor wrote:
On 11/08/2010 04:55 AM, M A Young wrote:
I am trying to work out whether it is practical to propose Dom0 xen
support as a feature for Fedora 15.
The kernel situation is that Domain 0 has been accepted upstream for
2.6.37. Assuming a 3 month kernel release cycle, F15 will
: [fedora-virt] [Fedora-xen] Dom0 xen support in Fedora 15?
Dor Laor wrote:
On 11/08/2010 04:55 AM, M A Young wrote:
I am trying to work out whether it is practical to propose Dom0 xen
support as a feature for Fedora 15.
The kernel situation is that Domain 0 has been accepted upstream
for
2.6.37
16 matches
Mail list logo