Hello List,
I have multiple Pools of XCP1.1 and XCP1.5beta. I'm sorry but I dont have
production XCP1.6b to check it.
There is a strange issue on Pool master where NFS v3 "getattr" % is very
high. Slave nodes are damn low on "getattr" %
#nfsstat on Master node gives me getattr % as 76% leaving lo
On 23/10/12 15:47, Dave Scott wrote:
> This is probably worth fixing, I'll make a pull request a bit later (unless
> you beat me to it :-)
>
> Thanks,
> Dave
Ha, no, I'll let you fix it :P
Kakadu, this fix probably won't make it into XCP or XenServer for a
while, so if you want to recompile xap
> On 23/10/12 14:15, Dave Scott wrote:
> > In case it's useful: the most recent versions of xapi (found in
> XenServer 6.1 and should be in XCP 1.6) can run without squeezed. So
> you can
> >
> > service squeezed stop
> >
> > and then when you try to start a VM, there won't be any squeezing at
>
Hi,
FYI the code in
http://github.com/xen-org/xen-api-libs/tree/master/rpc-light
is now significantly different from the upstream
http://github.com/samoht/ocaml-rpc
It's now moderately difficult to move patches from one to the other. I think we
should attempt to abandon our fork of this libr
Mike,
> ... seems to show xenopsd trying to rebalance memory,
While migration general balance memory rpc is called before whole
process (in pool_migrate_nolock funtion). Also while migration
reserving memory involves the same algorithm described in squeeze.ml
Squeezer module via calling Squeezed.
On 23/10/12 14:15, Dave Scott wrote:
> In case it's useful: the most recent versions of xapi (found in XenServer 6.1
> and should be in XCP 1.6) can run without squeezed. So you can
>
> service squeezed stop
>
> and then when you try to start a VM, there won't be any squeezing at all.
> Your ne
Dave,
While migration xapi reserves some memory doing calls to squeezed.
Moreover migration process will fail with Failure("The ballooning
daemon is not running") if squeezed is stopped. I think problem is
more complex than you've desribed :)
Cheers!
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Dave Scott
> > In case it's useful: the most recent versions of xapi (found in
> XenServer 6.1 and should be in XCP 1.6) can run without squeezed.
>
> If squeezed is stopped such functions like migration (and maybe
> others) can be broken, don't they?
The operations will work as long as there is already eno
> In case it's useful: the most recent versions of xapi (found in XenServer 6.1
> and should be in XCP 1.6) can run without squeezed.
If squeezed is stopped such functions like migration (and maybe
others) can be broken, don't they?
Best wishes,
Kakadu
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Dave Scot
Hi,
Dave asked:
> > When you try to migrate to a host which hasn't got much free memory,
> do you intend to run the existing squeezing logic?
Kakadu replied:
> Nope, it should do nothing. In future another balooning daemon will be
> running and case there is not enough ememory never gonna happen.
OOps, I should have read my mail properly: see
http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-api/2012-10/msg00146.html
On 23/10/2012 10:22, Lars Kurth wrote:
Hi,
a mail from Mike, the project lead detailing the way forward should be
on its way today. From what I understand there are a few bugs that
Hi,
a mail from Mike, the project lead detailing the way forward should be
on its way today. From what I understand there are a few bugs that need
fixing. It is likely that there will be another beta shortly, with some
time for testing to identify additional issues/verify that the
discovered o
12 matches
Mail list logo
