This method will not work… I have to sync just the deltas after the initial
sync as our bandwidth can not handle a full snapshot every time for every
machine.
Anyone else have an idea? This has to be possible, right?
On Jan 9, 2013, at 5:18 PM, Alexandre Kouznetsov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> El 09
Hello.
El 09/01/13 16:27, Chris Dutton escribió:
Hello,
What I am trying to accomplish is keep a vm on one host (a) in sync with
another vm on host (b). They are both using local storage for the SR,
which led me to investigate SXM. But it looks like it does just a little
more then I want.
Fro
Hello.
El 08/01/13 12:40, Joseph Hom escribió:
Sorry I mistyped the path. The device path listed in the vbd is what you should
be using kpartx on
e.g.
kpartx -av
/dev/sm/backend/55ea20d2-8611-1121-9e9e-c26b35ac1852/5e2c31a5-1d1b-4abe-9892-1fa3bc47b532
This will expose the partitions which y
Hello,
What I am trying to accomplish is keep a vm on one host (a) in sync with
another vm on host (b). They are both using local storage for the SR, which led
me to investigate SXM. But it looks like it does just a little more then I want.
From the Storage XenMotion wiki page:
Each of
Hello.
I can confirm, I have successfully mounted partitions from my VHD VDI
under Dom0. Thanks a lot!
El 08/01/13 12:07, George Shuklin escribió:
Ok, here important stuff. When VBD is plugged to dom0, it plugging not
as 'normal' device (with udev attention), but as device in /dev/sm/backend.
Dear Sir:
I am a student of Computer Speciaty in a university. Now I am studying
in principle of Xen Cloud Platform.There are a few of questions boring me and I
have to seek help to you.
If a guest os is destroyed,is the internal memory that it once occupyed
will scratched? Is t
On 9 Jan 2013, at 16:12, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 15:44 +, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
>> On 7 Jan 2013, at 16:39, Wei Liu wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 16:27 +, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:31:23AM +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> On W
Hello.
El 09/01/13 09:23, 网安-卞锦程 escribió:
If a guest os is destroyed,is the internal memory that it once
occupyed will scratched? Is the internal memory that it once occupyed
will recovered?
I don't fully understand what do you mean by "scratched".
But yes, once a guest VM (not really a
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 15:44 +, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
> On 7 Jan 2013, at 16:39, Wei Liu wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 16:27 +, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:31:23AM +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 16:44 -0500, Konrad Rzeszute
On 7 Jan 2013, at 16:39, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 16:27 +, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:31:23AM +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 16:44 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> c) Ideally I would like to add biography and inte
Dear Sir:
I am a student of Computer Speciaty in a university. Now I am studying
in principle of Xen Cloud Platform.There are a few of questions boring me and I
have to seek help to you.
If a guest os is destroyed,is the internal memory that it once occupyed
will scratched? Is t
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 04:39:14PM +, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 16:27 +, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:31:23AM +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 16:44 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > > > c) Ideally I would like to
We have seen that issue, too. Before doing anything, it is a good idea
to make sure the DVD is set to Empty for each VM.
On 1/9/2013 1:33 AM, George Shuklin wrote:
In my lab with copy of huge piece of product VMs (without internet
access) upgrade was completed successfully. The single issuse I
Good day.
I still do not understand current situation with XCP updates and git
tree. I understand there is a lots of stuff happens between code and
rpm, and it consume lot of time of many guys.
But few questions about current XCP code and fixes...
1) which branch contains current state of xa
Thanks for the info.
The fixes were exactly that. I will undo that changes before upgrade.
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:13 PM, ad...@xenhive.com wrote:
> We recently upgraded a XCP pool from version 1.0 to 1.1 to 1.6.We
> started by booting the pool master with the ISO, upgrading the pool mast
15 matches
Mail list logo
