Thanks much, Dave and Pasi, for your feedback. It certainly makes
sense to proceed in that order, viz. dealing with thin provisioning of
VHD before pursuing a pool-wide lvmthin implementation. Thanks very much
for taking this into consideration!
-=Tobias
On 1/12/2015 2:57 AM, Dave Scott wro
As of around CentOS 6.5 (and for sure in RHEL 6.4) that there is a
thinlvm utility that seems to take care of supporting thinly-provisioned
LVM volumes. There is an associated snapshot design based on LVM thin
provisioning that even supports the ability to do snapshots of
snapshots, etc. down t
So sorry, I meant of course to write that the utility is *lvmthin*
(_not_ thinlvm).
On 1/9/2015 3:54 PM, Tobias Kreidl wrote:
As of around CentOS 6.5 (and for sure in RHEL 6.4) that there is a
thinlvm *lvmthin* utility that seems to take care of supporting
thinly-provisioned LVM volumes. There
> On 12 Jan 2015, at 09:29, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 03:59:26PM -0700, Tobias Kreidl wrote:
>> So sorry, I meant of course to write that the utility is lvmthin (not
>> thinlvm).
>>
>
> Hello,
>
> I *think* the lvmthin stuff is currently designed for single-host s
On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 03:59:26PM -0700, Tobias Kreidl wrote:
>So sorry, I meant of course to write that the utility is lvmthin (not
>thinlvm).
>
Hello,
I *think* the lvmthin stuff is currently designed for single-host systems,
where the storage is used by a single dedicated host only. T
