flight 60810 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60810/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 19 guest-start/debianhvm.repeat
fail in 60775 REGR. v
flight 60807 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60807/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-xsm 14 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 59254
test-amd64-i386-xl
flight 60802 xen-4.4-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60802/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-i386-pvgrub 10 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 60727
test-armhf-armhf-
flight 60800 linux-3.4 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60800/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 6 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 30511
Tests which are failing
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 09:39:39AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 20.07.15 at 16:29, wrote:
> > Build xen.gz with EFI code. We need this to support multiboot2
> > protocol on EFI platforms.
> >
> > If we wish to load not ELF file using multiboot (v1) or multiboot2 then
>
> DYM "a non-ELF file"
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 09:18:17AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 20.07.15 at 16:29, wrote:
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/efi/stub.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/efi/stub.c
> > @@ -4,9 +4,14 @@
> > #include
> > #include
> >
> > -#ifndef efi_enabled
> > -const bool_t efi_enabled = 0;
> > -#endif
> > +st
flight 37841 distros-debian-snapshot real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/37841/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-i386-amd64-daily-netboot-pygrub 9 debian-di-install fail blocked in
37835
test-am
flight 60793 linux-next real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60793/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-intel 11 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 60709
test-armhf-armhf-xl-xs
On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 06:41 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >
> > > > On 16.08.15 at 11:14, wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-08-14 at 04:07 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > If so, I'd be inclined to suggest a force push based on this
> > > flight.
> >
> > Overall I think I'm inclined to agree, I suppose you
On Fri, 2015-08-21 at 15:02 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 09:05:30AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 00:18 +, osstest service owner wrote:
> > > flight 60719 osstest real [real]
> > > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60719/
> > >
> > > Fai
10 matches
Mail list logo