[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 60810: regressions - FAIL

2015-08-22 Thread osstest service owner
flight 60810 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60810/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 19 guest-start/debianhvm.repeat fail in 60775 REGR. v

[Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 60807: regressions - FAIL

2015-08-22 Thread osstest service owner
flight 60807 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60807/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-xsm 14 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 59254 test-amd64-i386-xl

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.4-testing test] 60802: regressions - FAIL

2015-08-22 Thread osstest service owner
flight 60802 xen-4.4-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60802/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-i386-pvgrub 10 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 60727 test-armhf-armhf-

[Xen-devel] [linux-3.4 test] 60800: regressions - FAIL

2015-08-22 Thread osstest service owner
flight 60800 linux-3.4 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60800/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 6 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 30511 Tests which are failing

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 10/23] efi: build xen.gz with EFI code

2015-08-22 Thread Daniel Kiper
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 09:39:39AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 20.07.15 at 16:29, wrote: > > Build xen.gz with EFI code. We need this to support multiboot2 > > protocol on EFI platforms. > > > > If we wish to load not ELF file using multiboot (v1) or multiboot2 then > > DYM "a non-ELF file"

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 09/23] efi: create efi_enabled()

2015-08-22 Thread Daniel Kiper
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 09:18:17AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 20.07.15 at 16:29, wrote: > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/efi/stub.c > > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/efi/stub.c > > @@ -4,9 +4,14 @@ > > #include > > #include > > > > -#ifndef efi_enabled > > -const bool_t efi_enabled = 0; > > -#endif > > +st

[Xen-devel] [distros-debian-snapshot test] 37841: tolerable FAIL

2015-08-22 Thread Platform Team regression test user
flight 37841 distros-debian-snapshot real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/37841/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-i386-amd64-daily-netboot-pygrub 9 debian-di-install fail blocked in 37835 test-am

[Xen-devel] [linux-next test] 60793: regressions - FAIL

2015-08-22 Thread osstest service owner
flight 60793 linux-next real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60793/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-intel 11 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 60709 test-armhf-armhf-xl-xs

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.4-testing test] 60673: regressions - FAIL

2015-08-22 Thread Ian Campbell
On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 06:41 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > > > On 16.08.15 at 11:14, wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-08-14 at 04:07 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > If so, I'd be inclined to suggest a force push based on this > > > flight. > > > > Overall I think I'm inclined to agree, I suppose you

Re: [Xen-devel] [osstest test] 60719: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2015-08-22 Thread Ian Campbell
On Fri, 2015-08-21 at 15:02 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 09:05:30AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 00:18 +, osstest service owner wrote: > > > flight 60719 osstest real [real] > > > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60719/ > > > > > > Fai