Il 27/08/2015 16:46, Wei Liu ha scritto:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 04:41:46PM +0200, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
Today trying xen 4.6.0-rc2 with all things needed for future production
server I found a regression: xl create fails if domU have custom vifname.
xl create test.cfg
Parsing config from
On 28.08.15 at 04:01, kevin.t...@intel.com wrote:
From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 3:59 PM
Tamas K Lengyel tamas.leng...@zentific.com 08/25/15 1:51 AM
@@ -1768,7 +1768,7 @@ static void vmx_enable_msr_exit_interception(struct
domain *d)
On 27.08.15 at 20:04, andrew.coop...@citrix.com wrote:
On 27/08/15 16:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 27.08.15 at 17:10, daniel.ki...@oracle.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 07:12:38AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 20.07.15 at 16:29, daniel.ki...@oracle.com wrote:
/* Copy bootstrap
flight 60882 linux-3.18 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60882/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-intel 11 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 58581
Regressions which are
On 27.08.15 at 20:43, konrad.w...@oracle.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 09:11:35AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 27.08.15 at 13:02, konrad.w...@oracle.com wrote:
--- a/xen/include/public/sysctl.h
+++ b/xen/include/public/sysctl.h
@@ -710,6 +710,48 @@ struct xen_sysctl_psr_cat_op {
On 27.08.15 at 18:24, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:05:56AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 27.08.15 at 17:54, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote:
When we create a source code tarball, mini-os is extracted to
extras/mini-os directory. When building a source code tarball, we
On 28.08.15 at 05:11, yu.c.zh...@linux.intel.com wrote:
To other maintainers, do you have any question or suggestion?
I certainly intend to get to reviewing these patches, but my originally
huge backlog hasn't shrunk enough yet.
Jan
___
Xen-devel
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 12:41:15AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 27.08.15 at 18:24, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:05:56AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 27.08.15 at 17:54, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote:
When we create a source code tarball, mini-os is extracted to
osstest service owner writes ([xen-unstable baseline test] 60878: regressions
- FAIL):
Old tested version had not actually been tested; therefore in this
flight we test it, rather than a new candidate. The baseline, if
any, is the most recent actually tested revision.
The above paragraph is
On 19/08/15 17:52, Juergen Gross wrote:
Commit b1c9f169047b (xen: split counting of extra memory pages...)
introduced an error when dom0 was started with limited memory.
The problem arises in case dom0 is started with initial memory and
maximum memory being the same and exactly a multiple of
On 19/08/15 17:53, Juergen Gross wrote:
Commit b1c9f169047b (xen: split counting of extra memory pages...)
introduced an error when dom0 was started with limited memory occurring
only on some hardware.
The problem arises in case dom0 is started with initial memory and
maximum memory being
Commit b1c9f169047b (xen: split counting of extra memory pages...)
introduced an error when dom0 was started with limited memory.
The problem arises in case dom0 is started with initial memory and
maximum memory being the same and exactly a multiple of 1 GB. The
kernel must be configured without
Commit b1c9f169047b (xen: split counting of extra memory pages...)
introduced an error when dom0 was started with limited memory occurring
only on some hardware.
The problem arises in case dom0 is started with initial memory and
maximum memory being the same. The kernel must be configured
On 28.08.15 at 10:47, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 12:41:15AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 27.08.15 at 18:24, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:05:56AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 27.08.15 at 17:54, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote:
When we create a
Andrew Cooper writes ([DOCSDAY PATCH for-4.6] docs: Fix installation of man8
pages):
c/s a430436 docs: Support for generating man(8) pages accidentally
failed to update to the install and clean rules for man8 pages, meaning
that c/s 7b21214 docs: Move xentrace.8 to docs/man/xentrace.pod.8
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 09:50:22AM +0200, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
Il 27/08/2015 16:46, Wei Liu ha scritto:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 04:41:46PM +0200, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
Today trying xen 4.6.0-rc2 with all things needed for future production
server I found a regression: xl create fails if domU
On 27.08.15 at 20:33, konrad.w...@oracle.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 04:07:36PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
El 27/08/15 a les 16.01, Jan Beulich ha escrit:
On 27.08.15 at 13:29, roger@citrix.com wrote:
When using Intel hardware without shared page tables between the IOMMU
On 8/28/2015 4:38 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 28.08.15 at 05:11, yu.c.zh...@linux.intel.com wrote:
To other maintainers, do you have any question or suggestion?
I certainly intend to get to reviewing these patches, but my originally
huge backlog hasn't shrunk enough yet.
Jan
Thanks for
On 28.08.15 at 12:54, shuai.r...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 07:06:00AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 25.08.15 at 12:54, shuai.r...@linux.intel.com wrote:
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/xstate.c
@@ -214,6 +214,11 @@ void xsave(struct vcpu *v, uint64_t mask)
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 03:49:06AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 28.08.15 at 10:47, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 12:41:15AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 27.08.15 at 18:24, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:05:56AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
On
On 27.08.15 at 19:56, 426...@gmail.com wrote:
If you advocate direct booting ( no boot loader) on production machines I
wont argue much, as long as there is good recovery tools to deal with
failed boots (grub does this very well, I am not aware of anything
comparable that is pure efi).
On 27/08/15 19:03, Ian Jackson wrote:
Wei Liu writes (Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] libxenstore: prefer using the
character device):
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 09:04:38AM -0500, Jonathan Creekmore wrote:
With the addition of FMODE_ATOMIC_POS in the Linux 3.14 kernel,
concurrent blocking file
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 07:06:00AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 25.08.15 at 12:54, shuai.r...@linux.intel.com wrote:
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/xstate.c
@@ -214,6 +214,11 @@ void xsave(struct vcpu *v, uint64_t mask)
typeof(ptr-fpu_sse.fip.sel) fcs = ptr-fpu_sse.fip.sel;
On 27.08.15 at 21:20, konrad.w...@oracle.com wrote:
--- a/xen/include/public/tmem.h
+++ b/xen/include/public/tmem.h
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
#define TMEM_SPEC_VERSION 1
/* Commands to HYPERVISOR_tmem_op() */
-#define TMEM_CONTROL 0
+#define TMEM_CONTROL_MOVED
flight 37845 distros-debian-sid real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/37845/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-i386-amd64-sid-netboot-pygrub 13 guest-saverestore fail blocked in
37840
Tests which
This document is going to explain the design details of Xen booting with
ACPI on ARM. Maybe parts of it may not be appropriate. Any comments are
welcome.
Changes v4-v5:
* change the description of section 4 to make it more generic
* place EFI and ACPI tables at non-RAM space of Dom0
Changes
On 28/08/15 07:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
Therefore I am very much +1 get grub working.
Then you kind of misunderstood: I'm not against getting grub2
working (i.e. patches prior to this one are fine in principle). What
I'm against is hacking around firmware+grub2 combinations not
suitable for
Hi folks,
we did run a retrospective at the developer meeting and I am writing up some of
my notes.
Regards
Lars
So what did go well
* Best ever code quality (see Andrew Coopers mail)
* New Release Process: fewer release exceptions compared to the past
* This means that most likely the release
The function should clean up after a failed map_pages_to_xen().
Sharing the M2P table with Dom0 needs to happen before adding
the new pages to the heap.
Avoid the IOMMU mapping loop whenever possible.
Drop a redundant setting of 'ret'.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich jbeul...@suse.com
---
Hi Andrew,
On 21/08/15 18:51, Andrew Cooper wrote:
This essentially reverts c/s 2037f2adb x86: introduce
alloc_vcpu_guest_context(), including the newer arm bits, but achieves
the same end goal by using the newer vmalloc() infrastructure.
I would keep alloc_vcpu_guest_context and replace the
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 02:22:46AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 27.08.15 at 19:56, 426...@gmail.com wrote:
If you advocate direct booting ( no boot loader) on production machines I
wont argue much, as long as there is good recovery tools to deal with
failed boots (grub does this very
The function referenced an __initdata object (nodes_found). Since this
being a node mask was more complicated than needed, the variable gets
replaced by a simple counter. Check at once that the count of nodes
doesn't go beyond MAX_NUMNODES.
Also consolidate four printk()s related to the
Hi Shannon,
On 28/08/15 10:45, Shannon Zhao wrote:
2. Copy and change some EFI and ACPI tables
---
[..]
All above tables will be mapped to Dom0 non-RAM space(e.g. the space
after Dom0 RAM).
If I understand correctly what you are saying, you plan to
On 28/08/15 13:41, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On 21/08/15 18:51, Andrew Cooper wrote:
This essentially reverts c/s 2037f2adb x86: introduce
alloc_vcpu_guest_context(), including the newer arm bits, but achieves
the same end goal by using the newer vmalloc() infrastructure.
I would keep
flight 60904 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60904/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 19 guest-start/debianhvm.repeat fail
REGR. vs. 60869
version
Hi Vijay,
You took over this series without asking me if I was still working on
it... You don't even address all the TODOs I mentioned in the cover
letter of v1 [1] which you didn't bother to retain.
If I didn't send a new version of the patch series it's because I was
waiting reviews from the
... except in cases where they really matter: node_memblk_range[] now
is the only place all regions get stored. nodes[] and NODE_DATA() track
present memory only. This improves the reporting when nodes have
disjoint normal and hotplug regions, with the hotplug region sitting
above the highest
flight 60884 linux-mingo-tip-master real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60884/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 13 guest-localmigrate
fail REGR.
flight 60888 seabios real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60888/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 17 guest-stop fail like 60761
Tests which did not succeed, but
On 28/08/15 13:57, Julien Grall wrote:
On 28/08/15 13:56, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 28/08/15 13:41, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On 21/08/15 18:51, Andrew Cooper wrote:
This essentially reverts c/s 2037f2adb x86: introduce
alloc_vcpu_guest_context(), including the newer arm bits, but
On 28/08/15 14:07, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 28/08/15 13:57, Julien Grall wrote:
On 28/08/15 13:56, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 28/08/15 13:41, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On 21/08/15 18:51, Andrew Cooper wrote:
This essentially reverts c/s 2037f2adb x86: introduce
alloc_vcpu_guest_context(),
From: Julien Grall julien.gr...@citrix.com
Based on 8.1.3 (IHI 0069A), unless stated otherwise, the 64-bit registers
supports both 32-bit and 64-bits access.
All the registers we properly emulate (i.e not RAZ/WI) supports 32-bit access.
For RAZ/WI, it's also seems to be the case but I'm not
From: Julien Grall julien.gr...@citrix.com
and use them in the vGIC emulation.
The GIC registers may support different access sizes. Rather than open
coding the access for every registers, provide a set of helpers to access
them.
The caller will have to call vgic_regN_* where N is the size of
On 28/08/15 15:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 28.08.15 at 16:11, andrew.coop...@citrix.com wrote:
On 28/08/15 14:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
The function should clean up after a failed map_pages_to_xen().
Sharing the M2P table with Dom0 needs to happen before adding
the new pages to the heap.
Why?
On 28.08.15 at 17:05, lars.kurth@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 Aug 2015, at 09:00, Jan Beulich jbeul...@suse.com wrote:
On 04.08.15 at 14:52, lars.kurth@gmail.com wrote:
= Issue / Observation =
Maybe my memory regarding the 4.5 release has faded, but I'm
having the impression that 4.6
On 28/08/15 14:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
The function should clean up after a failed map_pages_to_xen().
Sharing the M2P table with Dom0 needs to happen before adding
the new pages to the heap.
Why? Does this not create a race where dom0 can observe the new mfns
before they are ready to use?
On 27.08.15 at 17:29, jbeul...@suse.com wrote:
You're right, there's no such requirement on memory use in the spec.
But you're missing the point. Supporting grub2 on UEFI is already a
hack (ignoring all intentions EFI had from its first days). And now
you've found an environment where that
On 28.08.15 at 16:15, konrad.w...@oracle.com wrote:
Then I decided to see if I can expand that to also be part of the
'tmem_op', which looked legit (as it is the same size and offset and
pahole wise it looks right).
But sadly the compat layer is not happy with me:
In file included from
This patch set adds nested HVM test case for osstest.
In this test case, a Xen hypervisor (L1) runs on top of another Xen
hypervisor (L0).
Upon L1 hypervisor, we will then create a nested guest (L2), and test
if the Linux guest can then be installed and run well.
About nested Xen virtualization,
1. In this script, make some appropriate runvars which selecthost would
recognise.
2. Prepare the configurations for installing L2 guest VM.
3. Create a lv disk (and create vg inside) in L0 and
hot-attach it to L1. The VG which will later be used for
installing L2
In this patch
1. in check_ip(), we change $lstash to use {Name} key-value, rather
than {Guest}, because {Name} is both usable by $ho and $gho hash.
2. $ho-{Ether} assignment: if configured in host property, good, use
it; otherwise, try to see if runvar has the assignment (this is the
case of
Comment out CDROM entry in sources.list to make HTTP URL entry
available for L1 HVM guest VM.
Signed-off-by: Robert Ho robert...@intel.com
---
ts-debian-hvm-install | 7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/ts-debian-hvm-install b/ts-debian-hvm-install
index
In previous adding of 'submenu' parsing code, a mistake was made.
Now restore the match pattern to original.
Signed-off-by: Robert Ho robert...@intel.com
---
Osstest/Debian.pm | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Osstest/Debian.pm b/Osstest/Debian.pm
index
From: Ian Jackson ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com
Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com
Tested-by: Robert Ho robert...@intel.com
---
tcl/osstestlib.tcl | 7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tcl/osstestlib.tcl b/tcl/osstestlib.tcl
index 61a6a09..b5a52d3 100644
---
Signed-off-by: Robert Ho robert...@intel.com
---
ts-debian-hvm-install | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/ts-debian-hvm-install b/ts-debian-hvm-install
index 2ec4717..e271af8 100755
--- a/ts-debian-hvm-install
+++ b/ts-debian-hvm-install
@@ -202,6 +202,10 @@ sub prep () {
await_tcp usually invoked after a reboot, $ho IP may change,
especially when $ho 'client name' of DHCP request changes.
Therefore, await_tcp() check will fail if we don't update $ho-{IP}
accordingly.
But, if $ho has static IP, this won't apply.
Also, this patch add $ho-{Ip} in its $what message,
Though passes if judgement, the
overall_limit_pe(\$vg_more_free_pe);
may final judge no more free_pe to extend.
So, check if $vg_more_free_pe is 0, if so, we don't lvextend,
otherwise lvextend will report error on nonsense operation.
Signed-off-by: Robert Ho robert...@intel.com
---
This is more idiomatic because, even if host is fixed IP in
DHCP server side, client side shall still be dhcp mode, rather
than fixed self. And if it is not configured fixed in DHCP
server side, it shall more necessarily use dhcp mode.
This applies for both nested test and other test cases.
This function is called to add 'osstest-confirm-booted' service
in target's start up services.
Previously, this was dircetly done by
target_cmd_root($ho, update-rc.d osstest-confirm-booted start 99 2 .)
Here wrapper it because more than one place (ts-host-install
and ts-nested-setup) will need
Hi David,
On 20/08/15 10:55, David Vrabel wrote:
On 07/08/15 17:46, Julien Grall wrote:
The console ring is always based on the page granularity of Xen.
[...]
--- a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c
@@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ static int xen_hvm_console_init(void)
if
Schedul start osstest-confirm-booted script via call
`host_install_postboot_complete' fucntion; in order
to avoid open code.
Signed-off-by: Robert Ho robert...@intel.com
---
ts-host-install | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/ts-host-install
From: Ian Jackson ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com
Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com
Tested-by: Robert Ho robert...@intel.com
Resolve conflicts:
sg-run-job
---
sg-run-job | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/sg-run-job b/sg-run-job
index e4ebc22..ec03cce 100755
Signed-off-by: Robert Ho robert...@intel.com
---
sg-run-job | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sg-run-job b/sg-run-job
index 7cb6cac..4ae651d 100755
--- a/sg-run-job
+++ b/sg-run-job
@@ -69,14 +69,14 @@ proc run-job {job} {
per-host-ts broken
On 28.08.15 at 15:42, konrad.w...@oracle.com wrote:
And I am not comfortable to say 'GRUB2+Xen cannot run on this hardware
because your firmware vendor is not following the EFI spec in spirit.'
Well, not the least since I don't really agree with this (albeit I can
see where you're coming from)
On 28/08/15 14:59, Jan Beulich wrote:
... except in cases where they really matter: node_memblk_range[] now
is the only place all regions get stored. nodes[] and NODE_DATA() track
present memory only. This improves the reporting when nodes have
disjoint normal and hotplug regions, with the
On 28/08/15 15:43, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 28.08.15 at 14:28, lars.kurth@gmail.com wrote:
* Testing: staging and master being close together for most of the cycle
This was observed or said by whom? I've certainly got - not
infrequently - a different impression.
I second the query. The 4.6
+struct xen_sysctl_tmem_op {
+uint32_t cmd; /* IN: XEN_SYSCTL_TMEM_OP_* . */
+int32_t pool_id;/* IN: 0 by default unless _SAVE_*, RESTORE_* .*/
+uint32_t cli_id;/* IN: client id, 0 for
XEN_SYSCTL_TMEM_QUERY_FREEABLE_MB
+ for all
On 28/08/15 14:58, Jan Beulich wrote:
The function referenced an __initdata object (nodes_found). Since this
being a node mask was more complicated than needed, the variable gets
replaced by a simple counter. Check at once that the count of nodes
doesn't go beyond MAX_NUMNODES.
Also
Old tested version had not actually been tested; therefore in this
flight we test it, rather than a new candidate. The baseline, if
any, is the most recent actually tested revision.
flight 60957 xen-unstable running [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60957/
Regressions :-(
Add the appropriate #if checks around the kexec code in the x86 codebase
so that the feature can actually be turned off by the flag instead of
always required to be enabled on x86.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Creekmore jonathan.creekm...@gmail.com
---
Changed since v1:
* Reorder kexec files to be
On 20/08/15 10:59, David Vrabel wrote:
On 07/08/15 17:46, Julien Grall wrote:
For ARM64 guests, Linux is able to support either 64K or 4K page
granularity. Although, the hypercall interface is always based on 4K
page granularity.
With 64K page granularity, a single page will be spread over
On 20/08/15 09:10, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
Hello,
Hi,
I have some comments regarding the commit message, IMHO it would be good
that a native English speaker reviews it too.
El 07/08/15 a les 18.46, Julien Grall ha escrit:
The PV block protocol is using 4KB page granularity. The goal of
On 28.08.15 at 14:28, lars.kurth@gmail.com wrote:
* Testing: staging and master being close together for most of the cycle
This was observed or said by whom? I've certainly got - not
infrequently - a different impression.
Jan
___
Xen-devel
After integrated Ian J.'s code of nested infrasture changes, re-
write the nested job's recipe.
Signed-off-by: Robert Ho robert...@intel.com
---
sg-run-job | 10 ++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/sg-run-job b/sg-run-job
index 4ae651d..3f24fd6 100755
--- a/sg-run-job
+++
This patch does these 4 things:
1. wrapper coredump setup code from original ts-host-install into TestSupport.pm
2. replace ts-host-install original code with this wrapper function
3. in debian-hvm-install, create '/var/core' in hvm host post installation.
4. in ts-nested-setup, call this function
1. This patch adds creation of the nested test job, when job creation
procedure is invoked.
2. Set nested L1's vif model, nestedhvm feature, set specific disk
size and memory size for nested test by make-flight.
Changes since last version:
1. '\' right aligned
2. remove some unnecessary ''
3. no
On 28.08.15 at 11:45, zhaoshengl...@huawei.com wrote:
2. Copy and change some EFI and ACPI tables
---
a) Create EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE table
Copy the header from the origin and change the value of FirmwareVendor.
Careful: The version in the header may imply
For nested host/guest, its power on/off method shall be
its host invoke $(toolstack)-create/destroy method.
---
Osstest/PDU/guest.pm | 63 ++
Osstest/TestSupport.pm | 3 +++
2 files changed, 66 insertions(+)
create mode 100755
From: Ian Jackson ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com
No functional change.
We now call the per-host-ts finish steps unconditionally, rather than
only if !$need_build_host, per-host-ts is (complicated) no-op if
$need_build_host, since in that case $need_xen_hosts is {}.
Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson
Jan,
I wanted to pick this one up again, as this also came up in the developer
meeting (where we did a face-2-face retrospective). A few other possible
solutions were bounced regarding this problem.
Regards
Lars
On 12 Aug 2015, at 09:00, Jan Beulich jbeul...@suse.com wrote:
On 04.08.15 at
Another one from the developer meeting
= Issue / Observation =
Code style checking takes up too much time. This affects both reviewers who
spend a significant amount commenting on style issues and also makes it harder
to for contributors to focus on non-style issues. What I mean by the latter
flight 60903 qemu-upstream-4.3-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60903/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-raw9 debian-di-install fail baseline untested
Hi David,
On 20/08/15 10:51, David Vrabel wrote:
On 07/08/15 17:46, Julien Grall wrote:
Currently, a grant is always based on the Xen page granularity (i.e
4KB). When Linux is using a different page granularity, a single page
will be split between multiple grants.
The new helpers will be in
On 28.08.15 at 16:11, andrew.coop...@citrix.com wrote:
On 28/08/15 14:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
The function should clean up after a failed map_pages_to_xen().
Sharing the M2P table with Dom0 needs to happen before adding
the new pages to the heap.
Why? Does this not create a race where dom0
On 28 Aug 2015, at 15:43, Jan Beulich jbeul...@suse.com wrote:
On 28.08.15 at 14:28, lars.kurth@gmail.com wrote:
* Testing: staging and master being close together for most of the cycle
This was observed or said by whom? I've certainly got - not
infrequently - a different impression.
Jan Beulich writes ([PATCH v2 qemu-trad] HVM: atomically access pointers in
bufioreq handling):
The number of slots per page being 511 (i.e. not a power of two) means
that the (32-bit) read and write indexes going beyond 2^32 will likely
disturb operation. The hypervisor side gets I/O req
Hi,
Now I want to implement some functions in other hypervisor, so I need to read
SP_usr and SP_svc in HYP mode. I know Xen has implemented this function. But I
use it with regs-sp_usr/svc to achieve this. But I don't know how to achieve
it. I have read the entry.S file and get the process to
On 2015/8/28 23:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 28.08.15 at 11:45, zhaoshengl...@huawei.com wrote:
2. Copy and change some EFI and ACPI tables
---
a) Create EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE table
Copy the header from the origin and change the value of FirmwareVendor.
Namely Dom0 suffers from commit 5ae03990c1 (xen/vtd: create RMRR
mapping) having removed the creation of such mappings for non-
translated guests.
Reported-by: Malcolm Crossley malcolm.cross...@citrix.com
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich jbeul...@suse.com
--- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
+++
On 28/08/15 16:41, Anshul Makkar anshul.makkar@citrix.com wrote:
From: anshulma anshul.mak...@citrix.com
Sandybridge or earlier processors don't have huge page support for
IOTLB which leads to fallback on 4k pages and causes performance issues.
Shared EPT will be disabled only if the user
Since 75fbbc19 Arrange to test migration from the previous Xen
version, some flights have contained additional jobs build-*-prev,
which build a different revision of xen.git.
However, this violates an existing assumption in several of the
automatic archaeologists, namely that a flight should
This is straightforward. We simply don't look at the revision runvars
in non-main-revision jobs, when searching for suitable flights.
Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com
---
Osstest/Executive.pm |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/Osstest/Executive.pm
Ian Jackson writes ([OSSTEST PATCH 1/6] Other-revision-jobs: Provide central
test):
Since 75fbbc19 Arrange to test migration from the previous Xen
version, some flights have contained additional jobs build-*-prev,
which build a different revision of xen.git.
I have force pushed all these.
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:05:09AM +0800, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
On 8/27/2015 7:03 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:06:30AM +0800, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
On 8/25/2015 10:43 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 02:55:31PM +0800, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
On
Again, this came up in the developer meeting. This is my last one for today.
More next week
= Issue / Observation =
Sometimes it is difficult to find out whether a feature is supported (or in
experimental or other state)
This has an impact on the security team
It also makes life hard for Xen
This is rather more subtle. We want to be able to bisect over all the
relevant inputs.
What we actually want to do if one of the *prev* tests fail is to
treat the previous Xen branch as a separate tree when bisecting,
so each revision tuple has both current and old Xen versions.
That way if the
We need adjust only the regression analysis.
The other occurrences of special treatment for revision fields are for
reporting output, and are in the context of a specific job.
Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com
---
sg-report-flight |4
sg-report-job-history |
This is a string, a function of the job name, that identifies the
class of `other revisions'. It is empty for main-revision jobs
and currently there is only `delimiterprev' for build-*-prev.
We are going to use this in the bisector.
Reimplement main_revision_job_cond in terms of this. No
On 28 Aug 2015, at 17:22, Jan Beulich jbeul...@suse.com wrote:
On 28.08.15 at 18:04, lars.kurth@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 Aug 2015, at 16:21, Jan Beulich jbeul...@suse.com wrote:
B) Not enough coordination amongst committers
Can you be more specific (perhaps with examples) about this
This also came up at the developer meeting
= Issue / Observation =
See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7XdKyykk1-8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7XdKyykk1-8 from 35
There was also an item, called Not enough reviewer/committer coverage - I
wasn't in the room at the time. Maybe the person which
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
