Re: [Xen-devel] blkback feature announcement

>>> On 08.12.15 at 02:08, wrote: > On 12/07/2015 08:42 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote: >> El 07/12/15 a les 13.00, Jan Beulich ha escrit: >>> Hello, >>> >>> is there a particular reason why "max-ring-page-order" gets written in >>> xen_blkbk_probe(), but e.g.

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 65141: regressions - FAIL

> -Original Message- > From: Ian Campbell [mailto:ian.campb...@citrix.com] > Sent: Saturday, December 5, 2015 4:10 PM > To: Hu, Robert ; Ian Jackson > ; Nakajima, Jun ; > Tian, Kevin > Cc:

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 65488: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass

flight 65488 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/65488/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-intel 16 debian-hvm-install/l1/l2 fail REGR. vs. 65114 Tests which

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10 4/9] x86/hvm: loosen up the ASSERT in hvm_cr4_guest_reserved_bits and hvm_efer_valid

>>> On 07.12.15 at 17:48, wrote: > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c > @@ -1842,7 +1842,7 @@ static const char * hvm_efer_valid(const struct vcpu > *v, uint64_t value, > { > unsigned int level; > > -ASSERT(v == current); > +

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 65536: regressions - FAIL

flight 65536 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/65536/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i3865 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 65468 build-i386-xsm

[Xen-devel] [linux-linus bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64-xsm

branch xen-unstable xenbranch xen-unstable job test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64-xsm testid xen-boot Tree: linux git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git Tree: linuxfirmware git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/linux-firmware.git Tree: qemu

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 65498: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass

flight 65498 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/65498/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-amd64-pvgrub 3 host-install(3)broken REGR. vs. 65474

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH 09/16] mg-schema-test-database: New script

On Mon, 2015-12-07 at 17:27 +, Ian Jackson wrote: > This allows a user in non-standalone mode to make a whole new test > database, which is largely a clone of the original database. > > The new db refers to the same resources (hosts), and more-or-less > safely borrows some of those hosts. >

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH 11/16] mg-schema-test-database: Sort out daemons; provide `daemons' subcommand

On Mon, 2015-12-07 at 17:27 +, Ian Jackson wrote: > We arrange for the test configuration to look for the daemons on a > different host and port, and we provide a convenient way to run such a > pair of daemons. > > Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson Acked-by: Ian Campbell

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH 12/16] Configuration: Introduce $c{Username}

On Mon, 2015-12-07 at 17:27 +, Ian Jackson wrote: > This makes it easier to share the output of whoami.  As a beneficial > side effect it can now be overridden. > > Replace many open-coded calls to `whoami` etc. with references to > $c{Username}. > > Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson

Re: [Xen-devel] blkback feature announcement

On 12/08/2015 07:13 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: On 08.12.15 at 12:06, wrote: > >> On 12/08/2015 04:13 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 08.12.15 at 02:08, wrote: On 12/07/2015 08:42 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > El 07/12/15 a les 13.00, Jan

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH 16/16] mg-schema-test-database: Add workflow doc comment

On Mon, 2015-12-07 at 17:27 +, Ian Jackson wrote: > Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson Acked-by: Ian Campbell ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Xen Security Advisory 160 (CVE-2015-8341) - libxl leak of pv kernel and initrd on error

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Xen Security Advisory CVE-2015-8341 / XSA-160 version 3 libxl leak of pv kernel and initrd on error UPDATES IN VERSION 3 Public release. ISSUE DESCRIPTION

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH OSSTEST] mg-hosts: document "power" command

On Mon, 2015-12-07 at 17:24 +, Wei Liu wrote: > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu > --- >  mg-hosts | 7 +++ >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/mg-hosts b/mg-hosts > index a911099..0d02c56 100755 > --- a/mg-hosts > +++ b/mg-hosts > @@ -24,6 +24,13 @@ >  #

Re: [Xen-devel] [Minios-devel] Double gnttab_end_access in mini-os netfront

On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 13:00 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Marek Marczykowski-Górecki, on Tue 08 Dec 2015 12:46:31 +0100, wrote: > > > > http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=mini-os.git;a=commit;h=7c8f3483906 > > > > 52a67e > > > > 9356eec9cd2b0f76a9c7c72 > > > > > > > > With that commit reverted,

[Xen-devel] [libvirt test] 65523: regressions - trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

flight 65523 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/65523/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64 3 host-install(3) broken REGR. vs. 63340 build-amd64-xsm

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH OSSTEST v4 3/3] Create a flight to test OpenStack with xen-unstable and libvirt

On Fri, 2015-11-20 at 14:55 +, Anthony PERARD wrote: I think this will also add a devstack job to most other flights? That's a good thing, I think. I wonder if the flight ought to be called openstack-nova, to leave open the possibility of other openstack-$foo flights in the future? >

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH 15/16] mg-schema-test-database: Safety catch in JobDB database open

On Mon, 2015-12-07 at 17:27 +, Ian Jackson wrote: > When we open the `osstest' database, see whether this is a parent DB > (main DB) from which a test DB has been spawned by this user. > > If it has, bomb out, unless the user has specified a suitable regexp > matching the DB name in the env

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10 4/9] x86/hvm: loosen up the ASSERT in hvm_cr4_guest_reserved_bits and hvm_efer_valid

On 08/12/15 08:28, Jan Beulich wrote: On 07.12.15 at 17:48, wrote: >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c >> @@ -1842,7 +1842,7 @@ static const char * hvm_efer_valid(const struct vcpu >> *v, uint64_t value, >> { >> unsigned int

Re: [Xen-devel] Double gnttab_end_access in mini-os netfront

Ian Campbell, on Tue 08 Dec 2015 11:33:49 +, wrote: > > http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=mini-os.git;a=commit;h=7c8f348390652a67e > > 9356eec9cd2b0f76a9c7c72 > > > > With that commit reverted, issue vanishes. > > > > I guess it's because before this commit, there was "if (rx->status == > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [Minios-devel] Double gnttab_end_access in mini-os netfront

On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 12:11:34PM +, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 13:00 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Marek Marczykowski-Górecki, on Tue 08 Dec 2015 12:46:31 +0100, wrote: > > > > > http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=mini-os.git;a=commit;h=7c8f3483906 > > > > > 52a67e > > > >

Re: [Xen-devel] vcpu state are all paused

After update dom0 kernel to 3.19, all vcpus act normal. Thanks very much. 2015-12-07 21:02 GMT+08:00 Jan Beulich : > >>> On 07.12.15 at 13:56, wrote: > > On 07/12/15 12:39, Big Strong wrote: > >> I set the xen.efi directly boot without grub2 to be

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH OSSTEST v4 2/3] ts-openstack-tempest: Run Tempest to check OpenStack

On Fri, 2015-11-20 at 14:55 +, Anthony PERARD wrote: > This script runs the OpenStack integration test suite, Tempest. > > Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD Acked-by: Ian Campbell ___ Xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] blkback feature announcement

>>> On 08.12.15 at 12:06, wrote: > On 12/08/2015 04:13 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 08.12.15 at 02:08, wrote: >>> On 12/07/2015 08:42 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote: El 07/12/15 a les 13.00, Jan Beulich ha escrit: > Hello, > > is there a

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] block/xen-blkfront: Handle non-indirect grant with 64KB pages

Hi Royger, On 01/12/15 15:30, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > Just a couple of cosmetic comments below. Unless anyone else has real > comments I don't think you need to resend. Well, I'm considering those kind of comestic comments as minor. They are not necessary and doesn't improve the readability of

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-smoke test] 65545: tolerable all pass - PUSHED

flight 65545 xen-unstable-smoke real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/65545/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-armhf-armhf-xl 12 migrate-support-checkfail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl 13

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/time: Don't use EFI's GetTime call by default

On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 02:33 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > On 01.12.15 at 20:26, wrote: > > On 01/12/15 17:26, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > > > On 01.12.15 at 17:57, wrote: > > > > When EFI is used, don't use EFI's GetTime() to get the time,

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 0/2] block/xen-blkfront: Support non-indirect grant with 64KB page granularity

Hi Konrad, The rebase of my patch is not correct. It now contains an unused variable and missing one change. I will post the rebase of the two patches. On 01/12/15 18:52, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > +static unsigned long blkif_ring_get_request(struct blkfront_ring_info *rinfo, > +

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] libxl: Introduce a template for devices with a controller

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 12:09 PM, George Dunlap wrote: > We have several outstanding patch series which add devices that have > two levels: a controller and individual devices attached to that > controller. > > In the interest of consistency, this patch introduces a

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10 4/9] x86/hvm: loosen up the ASSERT in hvm_cr4_guest_reserved_bits and hvm_efer_valid

>>> On 08.12.15 at 12:37, wrote: > On 08/12/15 08:28, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 07.12.15 at 17:48, wrote: >>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c >>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c >>> @@ -1842,7 +1842,7 @@ static const char * hvm_efer_valid(const struct

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 65141: regressions - FAIL

On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 08:06 +, Hu, Robert wrote: > > > [...] Please trim your quotes. > For your failure, as Kevin mentioned in other mail, we will find someone > to look into. > Would you find out the detailed log of ' debian-hvm-install--l1--l2' > step? so that he > can start analyze, as

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 1/4] xen/MSI-X: latch MSI-X table writes

On Mon, 7 Dec 2015, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 07.12.15 at 13:41, wrote: > > I know that in your opinion is superfluous, nonetheless could you please > > add 2-3 lines of in-code comment right here, to explain what you are > > doing with the check? Something

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH 13/16] mg-schema-test-database: Change username for back-to-main-db xref

On Mon, 2015-12-07 at 17:27 +, Ian Jackson wrote: > The `username' of the xdbref task in the test db, referring to the > main db, is changed to `PARENT' (from `@'). > > Currently this is purely cosmetic, but it is going to be useful to > distinguish the two cases: >  * This is a test DB and

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH 12/16] Configuration: Introduce $c{Username}

On Mon, 2015-12-07 at 17:27 +, Ian Jackson wrote: > This makes it easier to share the output of whoami.  As a beneficial > side effect it can now be overridden. > > Replace many open-coded calls to `whoami` etc. with references to > $c{Username}. > > Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson

Re: [Xen-devel] Double gnttab_end_access in mini-os netfront

On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 11:33:49AM +, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Sun, 2015-12-06 at 03:19 +0100, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > Hi, > > > > When running HVM on Xen 4.6 with qemu in stubdom, I've found that > > something goes wrong with disk frontend (at least that was visible > > problem

Re: [Xen-devel] blkback feature announcement

On 12/08/2015 04:13 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: On 08.12.15 at 02:08, wrote: >> On 12/07/2015 08:42 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote: >>> El 07/12/15 a les 13.00, Jan Beulich ha escrit: Hello, is there a particular reason why "max-ring-page-order" gets written in

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH 14/16] mg-schema-test-database: Bump flight sequence number in test DB

On Mon, 2015-12-07 at 17:27 +, Ian Jackson wrote: > This makes test flights have different numbers to those currently in > production, which will help avoid accidents. > > Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson Acked-by: Ian Campbell

Re: [Xen-devel] Double gnttab_end_access in mini-os netfront

On Sun, 2015-12-06 at 03:19 +0100, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > Hi, > > When running HVM on Xen 4.6 with qemu in stubdom, I've found that > something goes wrong with disk frontend (at least that was visible > problem - a lot of read and write errors in stubdom log). But further > debugging

Re: [Xen-devel] Double gnttab_end_access in mini-os netfront

Marek Marczykowski-Górecki, on Tue 08 Dec 2015 12:46:31 +0100, wrote: > > > http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=mini-os.git;a=commit;h=7c8f348390652a67e > > > 9356eec9cd2b0f76a9c7c72 > > > > > > With that commit reverted, issue vanishes. > > > > > > I guess it's because before this commit, there

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 0/2] block/xen-blkfront: Support non-indirect grant with 64KB page granularity

Hi Konrad, On 07/12/15 15:01, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:21:46PM +, Julien Grall wrote: >> Thank you, the changes look good to me. What about patch #2? > > Oh, I thought you said you would rebase it - so I had been waiting > for that. > > Should have

Re: [Xen-devel] [RESEND][PATCH V9 3/7] libxl: add pvusb API

On 08/12/15 05:50, Chun Yan Liu wrote: > Any comments? I'd just started looking at this yesterday. :-) One comment for future reference: This series doesn't apply to staging, nor to staging the date which you sent it (25 November); I had to apply it to a commit before 5 November before it would

[Xen-devel] Xen Security Advisory 159 (CVE-2015-8339, CVE-2015-8340) - XENMEM_exchange error handling issues

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Xen Security Advisory CVE-2015-8339,CVE-2015-8340 / XSA-159 version 4 XENMEM_exchange error handling issues UPDATES IN VERSION 4 Public release. ISSUE DESCRIPTION

[Xen-devel] Xen Security Advisory 158 (CVE-2015-8338) - long running memory operations on ARM

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Xen Security Advisory CVE-2015-8338 / XSA-158 version 3 long running memory operations on ARM UPDATES IN VERSION 3 Public release. ISSUE DESCRIPTION =

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 1/6] xl: Return proper error codes for block-attach and block-detach

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 11:53 AM, George Dunlap wrote: > Return proper error codes on failure so that scripts can tell whether > the command completed properly or not. > > Also while we're at it, normalize init and dispose of > libxl_device_disk structures. This means

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH 13/16] mg-schema-test-database: Change username for back-to-main-db xref

Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 13/16] mg-schema-test-database: Change username for back-to-main-db xref"): > On Mon, 2015-12-07 at 17:27 +, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Currently this is purely cosmetic, but it is going to be useful to > > distinguish the two cases: > >  * This is a test

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH] Executive: Permit OSSTEST_TASK= (for static tasks)

On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 14:19 +, Ian Jackson wrote: > If OSSTEST_TASK is not set, we construct a from the username > and the nodename, and look for a such a static task.  If OSSTEST_TASK > /is/ set would require it to contain ` '. > > In this patch, permit OSSTEST_TASK to be set simply to the

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10 4/9] x86/hvm: loosen up the ASSERT in hvm_cr4_guest_reserved_bits and hvm_efer_valid

On 08/12/15 12:54, Jan Beulich wrote: On 08.12.15 at 12:37, wrote: >> On 08/12/15 08:28, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 07.12.15 at 17:48, wrote: --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c @@ -1842,7 +1842,7 @@

Re: [Xen-devel] Success with pv guest and ATI Radeon HD4550

On 09/12/15 01:51, Andrew Cooper wrote: On 08/12/15 14:37, Geoffrey McRae wrote: Hi All, This is just a heads up on the steps involved in getting a HD4550 working with the ATI driver as a pv guest on a Dom0 with no IOMMU support. The main issue with making this work was providing a way for

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH OSSTEST v4 3/3] Create a flight to test OpenStack with xen-unstable and libvirt

On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 14:54 +, Anthony PERARD wrote: > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 10:23:49AM +, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-11-20 at 14:55 +, Anthony PERARD wrote: > > > > I think this will also add a devstack job to most other flights? That's > > a > > good thing, I think. > >

[Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH] Executive: Permit OSSTEST_TASK= (for static tasks)

If OSSTEST_TASK is not set, we construct a from the username and the nodename, and look for a such a static task. If OSSTEST_TASK /is/ set would require it to contain ` '. In this patch, permit OSSTEST_TASK to be set simply to the . This is much more convenient and doesn't involve manually

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH 15/16] mg-schema-test-database: Safety catch in JobDB database open

Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 15/16] mg-schema-test-database: Safety catch in JobDB database open"): > On Mon, 2015-12-07 at 17:27 +, Ian Jackson wrote: > > +# mg-schema-test-database creates a task > > +#   xdbref/DBNAME with username ${Username}@ > > Was there intended

[Xen-devel] xenstore domain

I'm just playing a little bit with xenstore in an own domain. I've come across some questions I'd like to have some answers to before presenting official patches to make this an easy configurable option: a) As this would need a boot time configuration item I'd like to add e.g.

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH OSSTEST v4 3/3] Create a flight to test OpenStack with xen-unstable and libvirt

On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 10:23:49AM +, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Fri, 2015-11-20 at 14:55 +, Anthony PERARD wrote: > > I think this will also add a devstack job to most other flights? That's a > good thing, I think. That was not my intention. It's true that the more test, the better, but

Re: [Xen-devel] Success with pv guest and ATI Radeon HD4550

On 08/12/15 14:55, Geoffrey McRae wrote: > > On 09/12/15 01:51, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> On 08/12/15 14:37, Geoffrey McRae wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> This is just a heads up on the steps involved in getting a HD4550 >>> working with the ATI driver as a pv guest on a Dom0 with no IOMMU >>> support.

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix regression in xendomains initscript: test for privcmd char device

Since commit: "xendomains initscript: test for privcmd char device" (1367e9e5ba4d1612e303123ec0bbf961100fcfa1) due to incorrect negation the xendomains initscript bails out early when both: "/dev/xen/privcmd" and "/proc/xen/privcmd" are present in dom0. Signed-off-by: Sander Eikelenboom

[Xen-devel] [distros-debian-snapshot test] 38464: regressions - FAIL

flight 38464 distros-debian-snapshot real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/38464/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-amd64-weekly-netinst-pygrub 9 debian-di-install fail REGR. vs.

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/HVM: Merge HVM and PVH hypercall tables

The tables are almost identical and therefore there is little reason to keep both sets. PVH needs 3 extra hypercalls: * mmuext_op. PVH uses MMUEXT_TLB_FLUSH_MULTI and MMUEXT_INVLPG_MULTI to optimize TLB flushing. Since HVMlite guests may decide to use them as well we can allow these two

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH OSSTEST v2] standalone: Log things we are running via with_logging

Ian Campbell writes ("[PATCH OSSTEST v2] standalone: Log things we are running via with_logging"): > Turning on set -x generally in this script is too verbose, so run the > command in a subshell which sets -x. > > Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell Acked-by: Ian Jackson

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCHv6] 02/28] build: build Kconfig and config rules

On 12/8/15 1:32 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: On 07.12.15 at 22:27, wrote: >> On 12/3/15 2:57 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 03.12.15 at 01:34, wrote: On 12/1/15 5:22 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: On 30.11.15 at 18:53, wrote:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCHv6] 02/28] build: build Kconfig and config rules

>>> On 08.12.15 at 15:16, wrote: > On 12/8/15 1:32 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 07.12.15 at 22:27, wrote: >>> On 12/3/15 2:57 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> On 03.12.15 at 01:34, wrote: > On 12/1/15 5:22 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:

Re: [Xen-devel] Success with pv guest and ATI Radeon HD4550

On 08/12/15 14:37, Geoffrey McRae wrote: > Hi All, > > This is just a heads up on the steps involved in getting a HD4550 > working with the ATI driver as a pv guest on a Dom0 with no IOMMU > support. The main issue with making this work was providing a way for > the guest to read the vga bios. > >

Re: [Xen-devel] xenstore domain

On 08/12/15 14:44, Juergen Gross wrote: > I'm just playing a little bit with xenstore in an own domain. > > I've come across some questions I'd like to have some answers to before > presenting official patches to make this an easy configurable option: > > a) As this would need a boot time

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix regression in xendomains initscript: test for privcmd char device

Sander Eikelenboom writes ("[PATCH] Fix regression in xendomains initscript: test for privcmd char device"): > Since commit: > "xendomains initscript: test for privcmd char device" > (1367e9e5ba4d1612e303123ec0bbf961100fcfa1) > due to incorrect negation the xendomains initscript bails out > early

[Xen-devel] Success with pv guest and ATI Radeon HD4550

Hi All, This is just a heads up on the steps involved in getting a HD4550 working with the ATI driver as a pv guest on a Dom0 with no IOMMU support. The main issue with making this work was providing a way for the guest to read the vga bios. [2.127078] [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1 2/2] libxl: re-implement libxl__xs_printf()

On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 15:22 +, Paul Durrant wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Ian Campbell [mailto:ian.campb...@citrix.com] > > Sent: 02 December 2015 15:21 > > To: Paul Durrant; xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org > > Cc: Ian Jackson; Stefano Stabellini; Wei Liu > > Subject: Re:

Re: [Xen-devel] xenstore domain

On 08/12/15 16:04, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 08/12/15 14:44, Juergen Gross wrote: >> I'm just playing a little bit with xenstore in an own domain. >> >> I've come across some questions I'd like to have some answers to before >> presenting official patches to make this an easy configurable option:

Re: [Xen-devel] [libvirt] [FOR 1.3.0 PATCH] conf: add net device prefix for Xen

Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 10:59:32PM -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote: >> On 12/07/2015 11:52 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 09:42:21AM -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote: In commit d2e5538b1, the libxl driver was changed to copy interface names

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10 5/9] xen/x86: allow HVM guests to use hypercalls to bring up vCPUs

On Mon, 2015-12-07 at 17:48 +0100, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > Allow the usage of the VCPUOP_initialise, VCPUOP_up, VCPUOP_down, > VCPUOP_is_up, VCPUOP_get_physid and VCPUOP_send_nmi hypercalls from HVM > guests. > > This patch introduces a new structure (vcpu_hvm_context) that should be > used > in

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-smoke test] 65561: tolerable all pass - PUSHED

flight 65561 xen-unstable-smoke real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/65561/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-armhf-armhf-xl 12 migrate-support-checkfail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl 13

Re: [Xen-devel] xenstore domain

On 08/12/15 16:02, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 08/12/15 16:04, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> On 08/12/15 14:44, Juergen Gross wrote: >>> I'm just playing a little bit with xenstore in an own domain. >>> >>> I've come across some questions I'd like to have some answers to before >>> presenting official

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 2/6] libxl: Fix libxl_set_memory_target return value

On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 11:53 +, George Dunlap wrote: > libxl_set_memory_target seems to have the following return values: > > * 1 on failure, if the failure happens because of a xenstore error *or* > invalid target > > * -1 if the setmaxmem hypercall > > * -errno if the set_pod_target

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCHv6] 02/28] build: build Kconfig and config rules

On 12/8/15 8:25 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: On 08.12.15 at 15:16, wrote: >> On 12/8/15 1:32 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 07.12.15 at 22:27, wrote: On 12/3/15 2:57 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: On 03.12.15 at 01:34, wrote:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools/libxc: Identify problematic file in error messages

On Mon, 2015-12-07 at 13:09 +, Andrew Cooper wrote: > Error messages along the lines of: > >    xc: error: panic: xc_dom_core.c:207: failed to open file: No such file > or >    directory: Internal error > > are of very little use. > > Include the filename in the error messages, so the user

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] libxc: try to find last used pfn when migrating

On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 16:30 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 02/12/15 16:28, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 12:36 +, Andrew Cooper wrote: > > > On 02/12/15 07:42, Juergen Gross wrote: > > > > diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_sr_save_x86_hvm.c > > > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 4/6] xl: Return an error on failed cd-insert

On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 11:53 +, George Dunlap wrote: > This makes xl more useful in scripts. > > The strange thing about this is that the internal cd_insert function > *already* returned something appropriate, and cd-eject was using it, > but cd-insert wasnt. Missing an apostrophe in wasnt.

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 5/6] xl: Return error codes for pci* commands

On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 11:53 +, George Dunlap wrote: > Add return codes for pci-detach, pci-attach, pci-asssignable-add, and > pci-assignable-remove. > > Returning error codes makes it easier for shell scripts to tell if a > command has failed or succeeded. > > Signed-off-by: George Dunlap

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 6/6] xl: Return error code on save

On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 11:53 +, George Dunlap wrote: > save_domain was already constructing an error code; it just wasn't > being used. > > Signed-off-by: George Dunlap Acked-by: Ian Campbell > --- > CC: Ian Campbell

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCHv6] 02/28] build: build Kconfig and config rules

On 08/12/15 17:59, Doug Goldstein wrote: > On 12/8/15 8:25 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 08.12.15 at 15:16, wrote: >>> On 12/8/15 1:32 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> On 07.12.15 at 22:27, wrote: > On 12/3/15 2:57 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: > On

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 65540: regressions - trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

flight 65540 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/65540/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-prev 3 host-install(3) broken REGR. vs. 65114 build-i386-xsm

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix regression in xendomains initscript: test for privcmd char device

On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 15:14 +, Ian Jackson wrote: > Sander Eikelenboom writes ("[PATCH] Fix regression in xendomains > initscript: test for privcmd char device"): > > Since commit: > > "xendomains initscript: test for privcmd char device" > > (1367e9e5ba4d1612e303123ec0bbf961100fcfa1) > > due

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] libxl: Introduce a template for devices with a controller

On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 12:26 +, George Dunlap wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 12:09 PM, George Dunlap > wrote: > > We have several outstanding patch series which add devices that have > > two levels: a controller and individual devices attached to that > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 2/6] libxl: Fix libxl_set_memory_target return value

On 08/12/15 17:19, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 11:53 +, George Dunlap wrote: >> libxl_set_memory_target seems to have the following return values: >> >> * 1 on failure, if the failure happens because of a xenstore error *or* >> invalid target >> >> * -1 if the setmaxmem

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-smoke test] 65569: regressions - FAIL

flight 65569 xen-unstable-smoke real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/65569/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-xl 11 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 65561 Tests which

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 04/14] x86/time.c: Use correct guest TSC frequency in tsc_get_info()

On 12/07/2015 08:08 PM, Haozhong Zhang wrote: On 12/07/15 12:53, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: On 12/06/2015 03:58 PM, Haozhong Zhang wrote: When the TSC mode of a HVM container is TSC_MODE_DEFAULT or TSC_MODE_PVRDTSCP and no TSC emulation is used, the existing tsc_get_info() uses the host TSC

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 1/6] xl: Return proper error codes for block-attach and block-detach

On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 11:53 +, George Dunlap wrote: > Return proper error codes on failure so that scripts can tell whether > the command completed properly or not. > > Also while we're at it, normalize init and dispose of > libxl_device_disk structures.  This means calling init and dispose

[Xen-devel] [ovmf bisection] complete build-i386-xsm

branch xen-unstable xenbranch xen-unstable job build-i386-xsm testid xen-build Tree: ovmf https://github.com/tianocore/edk2.git Tree: qemuu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen.git Tree: xen git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git *** Found and reproduced problem changeset *** Bug is in tree: ovmf

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 0/2] block/xen-blkfront: Support non-indirect grant with 64KB page granularity

On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 12:51:25PM +, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Konrad, > > On 07/12/15 15:01, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:21:46PM +, Julien Grall wrote: > >> Thank you, the changes look good to me. What about patch #2? > > > > Oh, I thought you said you

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 06/14] x86/time.c: Scale host TSC in pvclock properly

On 12/07/2015 08:52 PM, Haozhong Zhang wrote: On 12/07/15 13:14, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: On 12/06/2015 03:58 PM, Haozhong Zhang wrote: This patch makes the pvclock return the scaled host TSC and corresponding scaling parameters to HVM domains if guest TSC is not emulated and TSC scaling is

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCHv1] x86: rtc_cmos platform device requires legacy irqs

On Fri, 4 Dec 2015, David Vrabel wrote: > On 04/12/15 14:06, David Vrabel wrote: > > On 03/12/15 10:43, David Vrabel wrote: > >> Adding the rtc platform device when there are no legacy irqs (no > >> legacy PIC) causes a conflict with other devices that end up using the > >> same irq number. > > >

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 65542: tolerable trouble: broken/fail/pass - PUSHED

flight 65542 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/65542/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-amd64-pvgrub 3 host-install(3) broken in 65498 pass in 65542

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: update check-xl-disk-parse

The block-attach command now returns 1 when fails. Update first test case to expect return value 1 instead of 255. The parser now doesn't generate output for default values. Remove them from expected output. The "discard=" variant is never not supported, so delete two test cases with that

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCHv6] 03/28] build: use generated Kconfig options for Xen

On 11/30/15 8:45 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: On 24.11.15 at 18:51, wrote: >> --- a/xen/Makefile >> +++ b/xen/Makefile >> @@ -26,6 +26,9 @@ default: build >> .PHONY: dist >> dist: install >> >> +.PHONY: build >> +build:: $(BASEDIR)/include/config/auto.conf >> + >> .PHONY:

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-smoke test] 65572: tolerable all pass - PUSHED

flight 65572 xen-unstable-smoke real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/65572/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-armhf-armhf-xl 12 migrate-support-checkfail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl 13

[Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 65521: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass

flight 65521 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/65521/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-pair4 host-install/dst_host(4) broken REGR. vs. 59254

[Xen-devel] [linux-mingo-tip-master test] 65522: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass

flight 65522 linux-mingo-tip-master real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/65522/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-pair 4 host-install/dst_host(4) broken REGR. vs. 60684

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen-blkback: make st_ statistics per ring

Make st_* statistics per ring and the VBD sysfs would iterate over all the rings. Note: xenvbd_sysfs_delif() is called in xen_blkbk_remove() before all rings are torn down, so it's safe. This patch was based on konrad/xen.git/for-jens-4.5. Signed-off-by: Bob Liu ---

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.6-testing test] 65557: trouble: broken/fail/pass

flight 65557 xen-4.6-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/65557/ Failures and problems with tests :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd 3 host-install(3) broken REGR. vs.

Re: [Xen-devel] xenstore domain

On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 04:34:13PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 08/12/15 16:02, Juergen Gross wrote: > > On 08/12/15 16:04, Andrew Cooper wrote: > >> On 08/12/15 14:44, Juergen Gross wrote: > >>> I'm just playing a little bit with xenstore in an own domain. ... > >>> c) In order to be as

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen_pt: fix failure of attaching & detaching a PCI device to VM repeatedly

Add pci = [ '$VF_BDF1', '$VF_BDF2', '$VF_BDF3'] in hvm guest configuration file. After the guest boot up, detach the VFs in sequence by "xl pci-detach $DOMID $VF_BDF", reattach the VFs by "xl pci-attach $VF_BDF" in sequence. An error message will be reported like this: "libxl: error:

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 65543: all pass - PUSHED

flight 65543 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/65543/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed version targeted for testing: ovmf 5ac96e3a28dd26eabee421919f67fa7c443a47f1 baseline version: ovmf

  1   2   >