Re: [Xen-devel] [SeaBIOS] [PATCH 2/8] tpm: No need to check the return status of measurements

2016-01-01 Thread Xu, Quan
On 31.12.2015 at 8:10am, wrote: > On 12/30/2015 02:31 PM, Kevin O'Connor wrote: > > The low-level measurement functions already handle error conditions, > > there is no need to check for the errors in the high level measurement > > functions. > > > > Signed-off-by:

[Xen-devel] [distros-debian-jessie test] 38579: tolerable FAIL

2016-01-01 Thread Platform Team regression test user
flight 38579 distros-debian-jessie real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/38579/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-amd64-jessie-netboot-pvgrub 10 guest-startfail like 38560 Tests which did

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 30/32] virtio_ring: update weak barriers to use __smp_xxx

2016-01-01 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 11:39:40AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > virtio ring uses smp_wmb on SMP and wmb on !SMP, > the reason for the later being that it might be > talking to another kernel on the same SMP machine. > > This is exactly what __smp_XXX barriers do, > so switch to these

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 32/32] virtio_ring: use virt_store_mb

2016-01-01 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello. On 12/31/2015 10:09 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: We need a full barrier after writing out event index, using virt_store_mb there seems better than open-coding. As usual, we need a wrapper to account for strong barriers. It's tempting to use this in vhost as well, for that, we'll need