[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 92529: regressions - FAIL

flight 92529 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/92529/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 65543

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 92456: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

flight 92456 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/92456/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): build-amd64-rumpuserxen 6 xen-buildfail like 92185 build-i386-rumpuserxen

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.3-testing test] 92504: trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

flight 92504 xen-4.3-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/92504/ Failures and problems with tests :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-pvops 3 host-install(3) broken REGR. vs.

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 92502: regressions - FAIL

flight 92502 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/92502/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 65543

[Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-unstable baseline-only test] 44360: regressions - FAIL

This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 44360 qemu-upstream-unstable real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/44360/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-xl 14

[Xen-devel] [seabios test] 92452: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

flight 92452 seabios real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/92452/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 16 guest-stop fail like 92036

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.7 Headline Features (for PR)

On 4/22/16 9:25 AM, George Dunlap wrote: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Lars Kurth wrote: >> >>> On 22 Apr 2016, at 15:08, George Dunlap wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Lars Kurth >>> wrote: Folks,

[Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 92440: regressions - FAIL

flight 92440 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/92440/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-rumpuserxen6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 59254

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.3-testing test] 92445: trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

flight 92445 xen-4.3-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/92445/ Failures and problems with tests :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-pvops 3 host-install(3) broken REGR. vs.

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 92446: regressions - FAIL

flight 92446 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/92446/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 65543

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline baseline-only test] 44359: tolerable FAIL

This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 44359 qemu-mainline real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/44359/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-intel 13 xen-boot/l1

[Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-unstable test] 92434: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

flight 92434 qemu-upstream-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/92434/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): test-armhf-armhf-xl-xsm 15 guest-start/debian.repeat fail in 92347 pass in 92434 test-armhf-armhf-xl

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.5-testing baseline-only test] 44358: regressions - FAIL

This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 44358 xen-4.5-testing real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/44358/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-pair 20

[Xen-devel] [linux-mingo-tip-master test] 92420: regressions - FAIL

flight 92420 linux-mingo-tip-master real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/92420/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-xsm 15 guest-localmigratefail REGR. vs. 60684

[Xen-devel] [libvirt test] 92421: regressions - FAIL

flight 92421 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/92421/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-libvirt 14 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 91479

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 92382: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

flight 92382 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/92382/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds 11 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 92310

Re: [Xen-devel] Remus and blktap2

I tried to upstream the DRBD code few years ago, but the maintainers were not willing to accept the patch, stating that stating that I had not proved that the entire Remus system implementation (memory and disk replication) was tolerant to all forms of system errors and maintain consistency of the

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] xen/arm64: use shift operator

Hi Julien, On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 05:08:26PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: >On 21/04/16 02:06, Peng Fan wrote: >>Hi Julien, > >Hello Peng, > >>On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 03:44:09PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: >>>Hello Peng, >>> >>>On 20/04/16 14:54, Peng Fan wrote: Use shift operator, but not

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 92362: trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

flight 92362 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/92362/ Failures and problems with tests :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 3 host-install(3) broken REGR. vs.

Re: [Xen-devel] Remus and blktap2

Hi, On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 06:07:46PM +, Shriram Rajagopalan wrote: >Blktap2 was the first disk backend implementation. I moved Remus to DRBD >because it had disk resynchronization support. For eg, when primary fails, >backup takes over. When primary comes back online, DRBD would

[Xen-devel] [seabios test] 92353: trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

flight 92353 seabios real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/92353/ Failures and problems with tests :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-xsm3 host-install(3) broken REGR. vs. 92036

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.5-testing test] 92345: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

flight 92345 xen-4.5-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/92345/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3-vcpus1 15 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail in 92237 pass in 92345

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 92364: regressions - FAIL

flight 92364 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/92364/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 65543

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.3-testing test] 92363: trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

flight 92363 xen-4.3-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/92363/ Failures and problems with tests :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-pvops 3 host-install(3) broken REGR. vs.

[Xen-devel] vnc-listen="0.0.0.0" not supported anymore?

Hello, This command allowed me to vnc into any virtual machine from anywhere on my network. This doesn't work anymore, I can only vnc into a VM if I am on the server itself: being on the server, 'vncviewer 127.0.0.1:5905' works, but being on another machine 'vncviewer xenserver:5905' gives me

[Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 92342: regressions - FAIL

flight 92342 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/92342/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-rumpuserxen6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 59254

[Xen-devel] [distros-debian-stretch test] 44357: trouble: blocked/broken

flight 44357 distros-debian-stretch real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/44357/ Failures and problems with tests :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-armhf 3 host-install(3) broken

[Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-unstable test] 92347: regressions - FAIL

flight 92347 qemu-upstream-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/92347/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-xl-xsm 15 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 83040