flight 101447 linux-3.18 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/101447/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 6 xen-boot fail REGR. vs.
101000
flight 101443 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/101443/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-amd64-i386-libvirt-xsm 9 debian-install fail in 101430 pass in 101443
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2
flight 101440 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/101440/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 15 guest-start/debian.repeat fail in 101429 pass
in 101440
Thanks, Tevin.
My experience with Windows is very limited, but it seems what happens
is that the system founds the perceval script, but is not able of
running it because it does not identify the shebang line (the first
line in the script). I'm not completely sure about this, but it seems
that's
flight 101455 xtf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/101455/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
xtf c184f0dddc9d8136b9bf0f81909cac3682b3c16f
baseline version:
xtf
> Project Team Roles {#roles-local}
> --
>
> +Sub-projects or teams are driven by the people who volunteer for the job.
> This
> +functions well for most cases. This section lists the main roles which
> projects
> +use. This section lists the default roles, which are based
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 07:55:27PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote:
> Contains items that at some point need to be addressed.
> The items do not directly affect governance.pandoc
>
> Signed-off-by: Lars Kurth
Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> ---
>
flight 101458 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/101458/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 12 migrate-support-checkfail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 07:55:26PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote:
> Added TOC
> Re-arranged sections compared to previous version of document
> Added new anchors where needed
> Split Roles section into two sections
>
> The actual content was not changed (with the exception of minor
> typos that I
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 14.10.16 at 11:59, wrote:
> > On 14/10/16 07:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 14.10.16 at 02:58, wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 14 Oct 2016, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> There should be a high barrier to
On 10/14/2016 03:51 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 03:43:19PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 10/14/2016 03:19 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 02:05:16PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>>
>>> Perhaps add in here:
>>>
>>> PVH is like PV
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 03:43:19PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 10/14/2016 03:19 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 02:05:16PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps add in here:
> >
> > PVH is like PV in that there are no PCI devices - which HVM
> > code
While we're here, use bool instead of bool_t.
Signed-off-by: Kyle Huey
---
xen/arch/x86/cpu/intel.c| 9 +
xen/include/asm-x86/cpuid.h | 3 +++
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/intel.c b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/intel.c
index
rr (http://rr-project.org/), a Linux userspace record-and-replay reverse-
execution debugger, would like to trap and emulate the CPUID instruction.
This would allow us to a) mask away certain hardware features that rr does
not support (e.g. RDRAND) and b) enable trace portability across machines
On 10/14/2016 03:19 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 02:05:16PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>
> Perhaps add in here:
>
> PVH is like PV in that there are no PCI devices - which HVM
> code would piggyback on to find the Xen PCI platform device and
> use its MMIO space to
On HVM guests, the cpuid triggers a vm exit, so we can check the emulated
faulting state in vmx_do_cpuid and inject a GP(0) if CPL > 0. Notably no
hardware support for faulting on cpuid is necessary to emulate support with an
HVM guest.
On PV guests, hardware support is required so that userspace
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Andrew Cooper
wrote:
> On a slightly separate note, as you have just been a successful
> guinea-pig for XTF, how did you find it? It is a very new (still
> somewhat in development) system but the project is looking to try and
> improve
On 10/14/2016 03:16 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 02:05:15PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> Make sure they don't use these devices since they are not emulated
>> for unprivileged PVH guest.
> Which means they would just return 0 ? Or would it get worst since
> the
On 10/14/2016 03:14 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>
>> +
>> +memset(_bootparams, 0, sizeof(pvh_bootparams));
>> +
>> +memmap.nr_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(pvh_bootparams.e820_map);
>> +set_xen_guest_handle(memmap.buffer, pvh_bootparams.e820_map);
>> +if
> :) I am now curious as to which bit I missed.
I made these changes.
- Kyle
---
tests/cpuid-faulting/main.c | 9 ++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/cpuid-faulting/main.c b/tests/cpuid-faulting/main.c
index 3e782a2..221567d 100644
---
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 02:05:16PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
Perhaps add in here:
PVH is like PV in that there are no PCI devices - which HVM
code would piggyback on to find the Xen PCI platform device and
use its MMIO space to stash the grants in.
For PVH we balloon out memory and stash
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 02:05:17PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky
Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> ---
> arch/x86/xen/platform-pci-unplug.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>
On 10/14/2016 03:04 PM, h...@zytor.com wrote:
> On October 14, 2016 11:44:18 AM PDT, Boris Ostrovsky
> wrote:
>> On 10/14/2016 02:31 PM, h...@zytor.com wrote:
>>> On October 14, 2016 11:05:12 AM PDT, Boris Ostrovsky
>> wrote:
From:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 02:05:15PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> Make sure they don't use these devices since they are not emulated
> for unprivileged PVH guest.
Which means they would just return 0 ? Or would it get worst since
the in/out would go to the hypervisor which would kill the guest?
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 02:05:14PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> Start PVH guest at XEN_ELFNOTE_PHYS32_ENTRY address. Setup hypercall
> page, initialize boot_params, enable early page tables.
>
> Since this stub is executed before kernel entry point we cannot use
> variables in .bss which is
On 14/10/16 19:55, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 10/14/2016 02:38 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> + jmp *%rax
>>> +
>>> +#else /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
>>> +
>>> + call setup_pgtable_32
>>> +
>>> + mov $_pa(initial_page_table), %eax
>>> + movl %eax, %cr3
>>> +
>>> + movl %cr0, %eax
>>> + orl
On October 14, 2016 11:44:18 AM PDT, Boris Ostrovsky
wrote:
>On 10/14/2016 02:31 PM, h...@zytor.com wrote:
>> On October 14, 2016 11:05:12 AM PDT, Boris Ostrovsky
> wrote:
>>> From: Matt Fleming
>>>
>>> The new
On 10/14/2016 02:41 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 14/10/16 19:05, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> PVH guests don't receive ACPI hotplug interrupts and therefore
>> need to monitor xenstore for CPU hotplug event.
> Why not? If they don't, they should. As we are providing ACPI anyway,
> we should
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 14/10/16 07:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 14.10.16 at 02:58, wrote:
> >> On Fri, 14 Oct 2016, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >>> There should be a high barrier to "Supported" status, because the cost
> >>> of getting it wrong is
On 10/14/2016 02:38 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> +jmp *%rax
>> +
>> +#else /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
>> +
>> +call setup_pgtable_32
>> +
>> +mov $_pa(initial_page_table), %eax
>> +movl %eax, %cr3
>> +
>> +movl %cr0, %eax
>> +orl $(X86_CR0_PG | X86_CR0_PE), %eax
>> +movl %eax,
On 10/14/2016 02:31 PM, h...@zytor.com wrote:
> On October 14, 2016 11:05:12 AM PDT, Boris Ostrovsky
> wrote:
>> From: Matt Fleming
>>
>> The new Xen PVH entry point requires page tables to be setup by the
>> kernel since it is entered with
On 14/10/16 19:05, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> PVH guests don't receive ACPI hotplug interrupts and therefore
> need to monitor xenstore for CPU hotplug event.
Why not? If they don't, they should. As we are providing ACPI anyway,
we should provide all bits of it.
~Andrew
On 14/10/16 19:05, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/xen-pvh.S b/arch/x86/xen/xen-pvh.S
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..58c477b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/xen-pvh.S
> @@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright C 2016, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 02:05:11PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> We are replacing existing PVH guests with new implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky
Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 67881 ovmf real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/67881/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf ad9448408a5d2863db4aa2cb5d1f0d4a27689528
baseline
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 02:05:13PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky
Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
On October 14, 2016 11:05:12 AM PDT, Boris Ostrovsky
wrote:
>From: Matt Fleming
>
>The new Xen PVH entry point requires page tables to be setup by the
>kernel since it is entered with paging disabled.
>
>Pull the common code out of head_32.S
Hi Jesus,
Since our last chat here is what I have done. I have created a new
virtualenv with "--no-site-packages" to insure a fresh clean environment. After
I followed your instructions and pulled up my "dir" data. I notice I didn't
have a "bin" directory and researched why. It turns
Make sure they don't use these devices since they are not emulated
for unprivileged PVH guest.
Also don't initialize hypercall page for them in init_hvm_pv_info()
since this has already been done.
Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky
---
arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 24
Start PVH guest at XEN_ELFNOTE_PHYS32_ENTRY address. Setup hypercall
page, initialize boot_params, enable early page tables.
Since this stub is executed before kernel entry point we cannot use
variables in .bss which is cleared by kernel. We explicitly place
variables that are initialized here
We are replacing existing PVH guests with new implementation.
Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky
---
arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 140 ++-
arch/x86/xen/mmu.c | 21 +-
arch/x86/xen/setup.c | 37
From: Matt Fleming
The new Xen PVH entry point requires page tables to be setup by the
kernel since it is entered with paging disabled.
Pull the common code out of head_32.S and into pgtable_32.S so that
setup_pgtable_32 can be invoked from both the new Xen entry point
Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky
---
drivers/xen/grant-table.c | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/xen/grant-table.c b/drivers/xen/grant-table.c
index bb36b1e..d6786b8 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/grant-table.c
+++
Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky
---
arch/x86/xen/platform-pci-unplug.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/platform-pci-unplug.c
b/arch/x86/xen/platform-pci-unplug.c
index 90d1b83..33a783c 100644
---
PVH guests don't receive ACPI hotplug interrupts and therefore
need to monitor xenstore for CPU hotplug event.
Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky
---
drivers/xen/cpu_hotplug.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/xen/cpu_hotplug.c
(Resending with proper mailing lists included)
PVH v2 support for unprivileged guests.
Previous version was posted long time ago. Major changes:
1. Drop PVH v1 support
2. Enable ACPI. This allows us to use much more of native code and
results in making this series much simpler (for example,
Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky
---
include/xen/interface/elfnote.h| 12 ++-
include/xen/interface/hvm/hvm_vcpu.h | 143 +
include/xen/interface/hvm/start_info.h | 98 ++
3 files changed, 252
QEMU XenServer/XenProject Working group meeting 29th September 2016
===
Attendees
-
David Vrabel
Jennifer Herbert
Ian Jackson
Andrew Cooper
Paul Durrant
Lars Kurth
QEMU depriv
===
DMOP
There has been
On 14/10/16 18:05, Kyle Huey wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Andrew Cooper
> wrote:
>> On 14/10/16 13:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 13.10.16 at 23:09, wrote:
--- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
@@
On 14/10/16 18:02, Wei Liu wrote:
> Wei Liu (3):
> libacpi: fix arm64 build
> libacpi: require ACPI_BUILD_DIR to be set
> libacpi: add back the "G" in "GNU" in licence header
All Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper
___
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 04:03:18PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 14/10/16 14:24, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:59:55AM +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Here's v2.
> >>
> >> The differences are:
> >> - review comments taken into account.
> >> - I'm *NOT* claiming
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Andrew Cooper
wrote:
> On 14/10/16 13:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 13.10.16 at 23:09, wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
>>> @@ -1315,16 +1315,20 @@ static int
Wei Liu (3):
libacpi: fix arm64 build
libacpi: require ACPI_BUILD_DIR to be set
libacpi: add back the "G" in "GNU" in licence header
tools/libacpi/Makefile | 10 +++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
2.1.4
___
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
---
Cc: Jan Beulich
---
tools/libacpi/Makefile | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/libacpi/Makefile b/tools/libacpi/Makefile
index c1f0af8..18a5cd4 100644
--- a/tools/libacpi/Makefile
+++
It's better to have a explicit error than a build failure returned by
gcc.
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
---
Cc: Jan Beulich
---
tools/libacpi/Makefile | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/libacpi/Makefile b/tools/libacpi/Makefile
index
The arm64 build for libacpi was broken due to two reasons:
1. ACPI_BUILD_DIR was appended twice to dsdt_anycpu_arm.c.
2. The inclusion of firmware/Rules.mk overrided XEN_TARGET_ARCH, which
made CONFIG_ARM disappear.
Fix those by:
1. Correctly generate full path for dsdt_anaycpu_arm.c.
2.
flight 101448 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/101448/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 12 migrate-support-checkfail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl
flight 101442 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/101442/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf ad9448408a5d2863db4aa2cb5d1f0d4a27689528
baseline version:
ovmf
On 10/14/2016 12:02 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> The common hvm_cpuid() code already does this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
> ---
> CC: Jan Beulich
> CC: Boris Ostrovsky
> CC: Suravee Suthikulpanit
This avoids needing a translation table between hardware ordering and Xen's
ordering.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
---
CC: Jan Beulich
---
xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c | 35 +++---
* Dom0 does now have an arch_config passed.
* hypercall() and smp_alloc_memory() no longer exist.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
---
CC: Jan Beulich
---
xen/arch/x86/setup.c| 6 +-
xen/include/asm-x86/processor.h | 2 --
Drop repeated identical BUILD_BUG_ON()'s
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
---
CC: Jan Beulich
CC: George Dunlap
---
xen/arch/x86/x86_64/mm.c | 12 +---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git
The common hvm_cpuid() code already does this.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
---
CC: Jan Beulich
CC: Boris Ostrovsky
CC: Suravee Suthikulpanit
---
xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c | 5 -
1
When the compat hypercall ABI was added for HVM guests (i.e. supporting 32bit
operating systems making hypercalls against a 64bit Xen), an ABI breakage was
introduced for non-compat guests, as the 64bit hypercall index became
truncated to 32 bits.
This has been the case for a very long time, but
Hello Jesus,
I’ll get started on debugging my environment right away. Thanks a lot for your
time. I have attached the logs of our IRC meeting today…I’ll email you with my
debugging results soon.
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 12:52:48AM -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> Hook up virtual_intr_delivery_enabled and deliver_posted_intr functions
> when AVIC is enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit
> ---
> xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c | 10
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 12:52:47AM -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> Enabling AVIC implicitly disables the V_IRQ, V_INTR_PRIO, V_IGN_TPR,
> and V_INTR_VECTOR fields in the VMCB Control Word. Therefore, this patch
> introduces new interrupt injection code via AVIC backing page.
>
> Also, the
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 12:52:46AM -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> Add hooks to manage AVIC data structure during vcpu scheduling.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit
> ---
> xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/avic.c | 82
>
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 12:52:45AM -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> AVIC introduces two #vmexit handlers:
> * VMEXIT_INCOMP_IPI
> * VMEXIT_DO_NOACCEL
Great.. Can you describe what you are suppose to do with them?
Please keep in mind that the point of the commit description is to
say
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 67879 ovmf real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/67879/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf a2d59ef2912079fe0631f7ee7661dad2ddb472c8
baseline
On 14/10/16 14:24, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:59:55AM +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here's v2.
>>
>> The differences are:
>> - review comments taken into account.
>> - I'm *NOT* claiming 'SuppOrted' status for Credit2. I'll do that in a
>>separate patch.
>>
>> v1
On 14/10/16 13:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 13.10.16 at 23:09, wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
>> @@ -1315,16 +1315,20 @@ static int emulate_forced_invalid_op(struct
>> cpu_user_regs *regs)
>> /* We only emulate CPUID. */
>> if (
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 11:06:55AM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Contrary to the description in the software manuals, in Long Mode, attempts to
> load %cs check that D is not set in combination with L before the present flag
> is checked.
>
> This can be observed because the L/D check fails with
. snip..
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/avic.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/avic.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..70bac69
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/avic.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,217 @@
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
>
flight 101445 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/101445/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 12 migrate-support-checkfail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:59:55AM +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here's v2.
>
> The differences are:
> - review comments taken into account.
> - I'm *NOT* claiming 'SuppOrted' status for Credit2. I'll do that in a
>separate patch.
>
> v1 is here:
>
>
flight 101434 linux-3.18 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/101434/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1 6 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 101000
On 14/10/16 08:08, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> On 10/13/16 20:33 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 13/10/16 19:59, Dan Williams wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Andrew Cooper
>>> wrote:
On 13/10/16 16:40, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at
>>> On 13.10.16 at 23:09, wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
> @@ -1315,16 +1315,20 @@ static int emulate_forced_invalid_op(struct
> cpu_user_regs *regs)
> /* We only emulate CPUID. */
> if ( ( rc = copy_from_user(instr, (char *)eip,
On 14/10/16 07:20, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 13.10.16 at 15:26, wrote:
>> On 13/10/16 13:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> Commit 6dc9ac9f52 ("x86emul: check alignment of SSE and AVX memory
>>> operands") didn't consider a specific AMD mode: Mis-alignment #GP
>>> faults can
>>> On 13.10.16 at 23:09, wrote:
> ---
This is lacking an S-o-b. And it would also be nice if you switched the
bool_t instances to bool as you're touching them anyway.
Jan
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
On 13/10/16 23:19, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> On 09/29/2016 08:54 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
>> Last part of the wiring necessary for allowing to
>> change the value of the ratelimit_us parameter online,
>> for Credit2 (like it is already for Credit1).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli
On 12/10/16 19:52, Ronald Rojas wrote:
> Change instances of printf, fprintf, and LOG where the specifier
> used is '%d' to be '%u' for domid.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ronald Rojas
Code looks good, thanks!
A couple of minor adjustments to the patch itself:
First, the
flight 101430 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/101430/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-libvirt-xsm 9 debian-install fail REGR. vs. 101365
Regressions
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: 14 October 2016 05:38
> To: xen-devel
> Cc: Paul Durrant
> Subject: [PATCH] x86/Viridian: don't depend on undefined register state
>
> The high halves of
On 14/10/16 11:17, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli
We don't have a general framework for declaring things "supported" yet,
and at the moment we only have a single level of "supported", which
includes XSAs. I do think it makes sense to include an
flight 101436 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/101436/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 5 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 101412
Tests which did not
On 14/10/16 11:28, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 14.10.16 at 12:06, wrote:
>> Contrary to the description in the software manuals, in Long Mode, attempts
>> to
>> load %cs check that D is not set in combination with L before the present
>> flag
>> is checked.
>>
>> This
>>> On 14.10.16 at 12:06, wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>>> On 14.10.16 at 12:06, wrote:
> Contrary to the description in the software manuals, in Long Mode, attempts to
> load %cs check that D is not set in combination with L before the present flag
> is checked.
>
> This can be observed because the L/D check fails with
>>> On 14.10.16 at 12:17, wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli
I have to admit that I would have expected a non-empty description,
at least briefly rationalizing the change of state.
Jan
___
flight 101435 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/101435/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf a2d59ef2912079fe0631f7ee7661dad2ddb472c8
baseline version:
ovmf
Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli
---
This goes on top of:
https://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-10/msg00944.html
I'm of course happy to rebase/resend, if the above mentioned series
changes.
---
Cc: secur...@xenproject.org
Cc: George Dunlap
>>> On 13.10.16 at 17:46, wrote:
> On 10/13/16 03:08 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 13.10.16 at 10:53, wrote:
>>> On 10/13/16 02:34 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 12.10.16 at 18:19, wrote:
> On Wed, Oct
>>> On 14.10.16 at 11:59, wrote:
> On 14/10/16 07:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 14.10.16 at 02:58, wrote:
>>> On Fri, 14 Oct 2016, Andrew Cooper wrote:
There should be a high barrier to "Supported" status, because the cost
of getting
flight 101429 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/101429/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw 9 debian-di-installfail REGR. vs. 101383
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
---
CC: Jan Beulich
---
xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c | 24
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
index ceb89c7..3c90ecd 100644
---
Contrary to the description in the software manuals, in Long Mode, attempts to
load %cs check that D is not set in combination with L before the present flag
is checked.
This can be observed because the L/D check fails with #GP before the presence
check failes with #NP
Signed-off-by: Andrew
>>> On 13.10.16 at 17:40, wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 2:08 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> [..]
>>> I think we can do the similar for Xen, like to lay another pseudo
>>> device on /dev/pmem and do the reservation, like 2. in my previous
>>> reply.
>>
>>
Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli
---
Cc: Meng Xu
Cc: George Dunlap
Cc: Wei Liu
Cc: Lars Kurth
Cc: Andrew Cooper
Cc: Ian Jackson
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo