Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/smpboot: Make logical package management more robust

2016-12-10 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 12/10/2016 02:13 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: On Sat, 10 Dec 2016, Thomas Gleixner wrote: On Fri, 9 Dec 2016, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: On 12/09/2016 06:02 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: On 12/09/2016 05:06 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Thomas Gleixner wrote: Boris, can you

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/smpboot: Make logical package management more robust

2016-12-10 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Sat, 10 Dec 2016, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 9 Dec 2016, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > > On 12/09/2016 06:02 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > > > On 12/09/2016 05:06 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > > > > > Boris, can you please verify if that

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/smpboot: Make logical package management more robust

2016-12-10 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Fri, 9 Dec 2016, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > On 12/09/2016 06:02 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > > On 12/09/2016 05:06 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > > > Boris, can you please verify if that makes the > > > topology_update_package_map() call which

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/smpboot: Make logical package management more robust

2016-12-10 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Fri, 9 Dec 2016, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > On 12/09/2016 06:00 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Fri, 9 Dec 2016, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > > > On 12/09/2016 05:06 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > > > > > Boris, can you please verify if that

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix errornous negation for isstubdom, which breaks HVM pci-passthrough.

2016-12-10 Thread Sander Eikelenboom
Commit 20b75251d9721d9c050a973c02baac396c794ade introduced an errornous negation which gave the isstubdom bool the opposite semantics, causing the subsequent code to take the wrong code path. Signed-off-by: Sander Eikelenboom --- tools/libxl/libxl_pci.c | 2 +- 1 file

Re: [Xen-devel] [MULTIBOOT2 DOC PATCH v3 01/13] multiboot2: Replace u_phys with u32

2016-12-10 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
07.12.2016 01:52, Daniel Kiper пишет: > u_phys is used just in two places and sometimes it may confuse reader. > Additionally, GRUB multiboot2 implementation does not use u_phys anywhere. > So, replace it with basic well defined and used in implementation u32 type. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Kiper

[Xen-devel] Missing "\n" in dump_softtsc() from xen/arch/x86/time.c

2016-12-10 Thread Anton Samsonov
When doing "xl debug-key s; xl dmesg | tail" as instructed for checking TSC emulation mode on x86, I always see this line unterminated: (XEN) dom2(hvm): mode=0,ofs=0x204b1518d4d,khz=2672736,inc=1 Apparently, the cause is simple: in xen/arch/x86/time.c there is static void dump_softtsc(unsigned

Re: [Xen-devel] [HACKERS] [OSSTEST PATCH 0/1] PostgreSQL db: Retry on constraint violation

2016-12-10 Thread Kevin Grittner
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: > In summary: PostgreSQL only provides transaction serialisability for > successful transactions. Even with SERIALIZABLE, transactions may > fail due to spurious and "impossible" constraint violations. > > As a

Re: [Xen-devel] AMD VMMCALL and VM86 mode

2016-12-10 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 09/12/16 19:55, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 09/12/16 19:55, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >> On 12/09/2016 02:01 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> While working on XSA-192, I found a curious thing. On AMD hardware, the >>> VMMCALL instruction appears to behave like a nop if executed in VM86

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen Project and Xvisor.

2016-12-10 Thread Jason Long
It is stopped!!! as you see in the article, The Xvisor compare itself with Xen and KVM and get better rank. I like to know the Xen Project strategy about the future. On Saturday, December 10, 2016 4:02 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: On December 10, 2016 1:24:57 AM

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen Project and Xvisor.

2016-12-10 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On December 10, 2016 1:24:57 AM EST, Jason Long wrote: >Please look at >"http://xhypervisor.org/pdf/Embedded_Hypervisor_Xvisor_A_comparative_analysis.pdf;. > That is all good, but the development on it seems to have stopped (no checking within the last 6 months)? Anyhow I

[Xen-devel] [distros-debian-stretch test] 68191: trouble: blocked/broken

2016-12-10 Thread Platform Team regression test user
flight 68191 distros-debian-stretch real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68191/ Failures and problems with tests :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-armhf 2 hosts-allocate broken