[Xen-devel] [PATCH V2] libxl/libxl_qmp.c: Fix code style in qmp_next()

Fix text-indent. Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen --- tools/libxl/libxl_qmp.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_qmp.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_qmp.c index ad22ad4..a91643a 100644 --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_qmp.c +++

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 103946: all pass - PUSHED

flight 103946 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103946/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: ovmf 3f31ea1b3d59c909734a8b709a0cfb761579981e baseline version: ovmf

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 03/24] x86: refactor psr: implement main data structures.

Hi, I just realize it is Christmas holiday. Merry Christmas! On 16-12-22 09:13:43, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 14.12.16 at 05:07, wrote: > > To construct an extendible framework, we need analyze PSR features > > and abstract the common things and feature specific

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl/libxl_qmp.c: Fix code style in qmp_next()

On 12/23/2016 07:44 PM, Wei Liu wrote: On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 11:16:58AM +0800, Zhang Chen wrote: [...] + Here, as I understand it, read can return incomplete message. For example, when the buffer is not big enough. And the inner loop in original code handles that by checking if there is

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 4/9] x86/SVM: Modify VMCB fields to add AVIC support

On 12/22/16 18:11, Jan Beulich wrote: On 19.09.16 at 07:52, wrote: --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/svm/vmcb.h +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/svm/vmcb.h @@ -328,14 +328,15 @@ typedef union __packed struct { u64 tpr: 8; -u64 irq:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 07/10] x86/SVM: use unambiguous register names

On 12/20/16 17:41, Jan Beulich wrote: This is in preparation of eliminating the mis-naming of 64-bit fields with 32-bit register names (eflags instead of rflags etc). Use the guaranteed 32-bit underscore prefixed names for now where appropriate. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 01/10] x86/MSR: introduce MSR access split/fold helpers

On 12/23/16 13:17, Tian, Kevin wrote: From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2016 6:36 PM This is in preparation of eliminating the mis-naming of 64-bit fields with 32-bit register names (eflags instead of rflags etc). Use the guaranteed 32-bit underscore

[Xen-devel] [linux-4.1 test] 103930: regressions - FAIL

flight 103930 linux-4.1 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103930/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-multivcpu 6 xen-bootfail REGR. vs. 101737 test-amd64-amd64-xl

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] x86/HVM: support (emulate) UMIP

On 12/7/16 23:06, Andrew Cooper wrote: On 07/12/16 15:39, Jan Beulich wrote: On 07.12.16 at 16:31, wrote: On 12/07/2016 10:14 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: On 07.12.16 at 16:10, wrote: On 12/07/2016 06:29 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: On 06.12.16

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 103933: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

flight 103933 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103933/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 13 saverestore-support-checkfail like 103918

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 02/24] x86: refactor psr: remove L3 CAT/CDP codes.

On 16-12-22 09:03:25, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 14.12.16 at 05:07, wrote: > > There is no construction without destruction. So, this patch > > removes all current L3 CAT/CDP codes in psr.c. The following > > patches will introduce the new mechanism. > > > >

[Xen-devel] [linux-3.18 test] 103920: regressions - FAIL

flight 103920 linux-3.18 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103920/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 6 xen-bootfail REGR. vs. 101675

[Xen-devel] [linux-3.18 bisection] complete test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-pair

branch xen-unstable xenbranch xen-unstable job test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-pair testid xen-boot/dst_host Tree: libvirt git://xenbits.xen.org/libvirt.git Tree: libvirt_gnulib git://git.sv.gnu.org/gnulib.git Tree: linux git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git Tree:

[Xen-devel] [linux-3.18 bisection] complete test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-pair

branch xen-unstable xenbranch xen-unstable job test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-pair testid xen-boot/src_host Tree: libvirt git://xenbits.xen.org/libvirt.git Tree: libvirt_gnulib git://git.sv.gnu.org/gnulib.git Tree: linux git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git Tree:

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-smoke test] 103929: tolerable all pass - PUSHED

flight 103929 xen-unstable-smoke real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103929/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 12 migrate-support-checkfail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable baseline-only test] 68271: trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 68271 xen-unstable real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68271/ Failures and problems with tests :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-xsm

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 5/5] tools/blktap2/drivers: Removenon-existent sys/sysctl.h include

On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 05:09:47PM -0500, alistai...@gmail.com wrote: > Hey Wei, > > Sorry about the top post but I’m doing this from my phone. > > That sounds good to me, you can use that commit message. > Thanks for confirming. Pushed to staging.

[Xen-devel] [linux-4.1 test] 103914: regressions - FAIL

flight 103914 linux-4.1 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103914/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl 6 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 101737

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 103918: tolerable FAIL

flight 103918 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103918/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds 15 guest-start/debian.repeat fail in 103900 pass in 103918

[Xen-devel] [libvirt test] 103915: tolerable all pass - PUSHED

flight 103915 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103915/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 13 saverestore-support-checkfail like 103827 test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-qcow2

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-coverity test] 103922: all pass - PUSHED

flight 103922 xen-unstable-coverity real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103922/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: xen ad891b1389cbafce2d31ef3f0c060c781689e2e0 baseline version: xen