flight 111017 qemu-upstream-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/111017/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 3 host-install(3) broken in 110975 pass in 111017
flight 111015 qemu-upstream-4.8-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/111015/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 15 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail REGR. vs.
106837
flight 111013 qemu-upstream-4.5-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/111013/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 15 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail REGR. vs.
106846
flight 111012 qemu-upstream-4.6-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/111012/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd 5 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 106835
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 71595 ovmf real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/71595/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
build-i386-libvirt5 libvirt-build
flight 111005 xen-4.8-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/111005/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-2 45 xtf/test-hvm64-lbr-tsx-vmentry fail REGR. vs. 110946
flight 71594 distros-debian-stretch real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/71594/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-amd64-stretch-netboot-pvgrub 9 debian-di-install fail REGR.
vs.
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 71593 ovmf real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/71593/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
build-i386-libvirt5 libvirt-build
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 71592 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/71592/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 16 guest-stop
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 71588 xen-4.5-testing real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/71588/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-libvirt 15
flight 111004 xen-4.6-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/111004/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-4 45 xtf/test-hvm64-lbr-tsx-vmentry fail REGR. vs. 110931
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 71591 xen-4.8-testing real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/71591/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-amd64-xl-rtds 6 xen-boot
flight 111019 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/111019/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf bb427a23ab1d047ffcf72828f6836ea64d49f6ac
baseline version:
ovmf
flight 111003 xen-4.7-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/111003/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-4 45 xtf/test-hvm64-lbr-tsx-vmentry fail REGR. vs. 110944
Tests which
Hi Konrad,
On 06/23/2017 03:46 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 03:36:51PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
On 23/06/17 15:35, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 02:45:22PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 23/06/17 14:43, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On
flight 111014 qemu-upstream-4.7-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/111014/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-armhf-pvops 4 host-build-prep fail REGR. vs. 106836
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 71589 xen-4.6-testing real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/71589/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-xl-xsm 3
On Sat, 2017-06-24 at 09:18 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 12:24:28PM -0700, tndave wrote:
> > Thanks for doing this.
> > So archs can still have their own definition for dma_set_mask() if
> > HAVE_ARCH_DMA_SET_MASK is y?
> > (and similarly for dma_set_coherent_mask()
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 71590 xen-4.7-testing real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/71590/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-xl 14 guest-stop
flight 111000 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/111000/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruck 15 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs.
110925
Tests which
On 24/06/17 12:46, John Thomson wrote:
> fallthrough in one case is missing the r.
> This fails to suppress -Wimplicit-fallthrough warning with GCC7
>
> common/libc/vsnprintf.c:388:19: error: this statement may fall through
> [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=]
> flags |= SIGNED;
>
flight 110999 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/110999/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 13 saverestore-support-checkfail like 110962
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 13
fallthrough in one case is missing the r.
This fails to suppress -Wimplicit-fallthrough warning with GCC7
common/libc/vsnprintf.c:388:19: error: this statement may fall through
[-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=]
flags |= SIGNED;
^
common/libc/vsnprintf.c:390:9: note:
flight 110994 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/110994/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 15 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail REGR. vs.
110465
flight 110990 linux-next real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/110990/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-xsm 6 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 110950
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 12:24:28PM -0700, tndave wrote:
> Thanks for doing this.
> So archs can still have their own definition for dma_set_mask() if
> HAVE_ARCH_DMA_SET_MASK is y?
> (and similarly for dma_set_coherent_mask() when
> CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_DMA_SET_COHERENT_MASK is y)
> Any plan to
Hi,
here a new version of my proposal for fuzzing the hypervisor. The original
can be found here: [1].
==
1. Motivation and Description
==
Fuzzing is a recent trend for systematic testing of interfaces by trying
more or less random
27 matches
Mail list logo
