uExceptionHandlerLib/OUTPUT/X64/ExceptionHandlerAsm.iii:315:
> error: invalid combination of opcode and operands
Can you attach a copy of the failing ExceptionHandlerAsm.iii as it is the
output of the preprocessor.
Thanks,
Andrew Fish
> make[7]: Leaving directory
> `/home/www/builds_
ssion: missing operator before {
> 0xE11FACA0, 0x4710, 0x4C8E, { 0xA7, 0xA2, 0x01, 0xBA, 0xA2, 0x59, 0x1B,
> 0x4C } }
>Near { 0xFFE06BDD, 0x6107, 0x46A6, { 0x7B, 0xB2, 0x5A, 0x9C,
> 0x7E, 0xC5, 0x27, 0x5C }}
>
That is not a common error. Can you attach you INF
ld just contribute theirs as BSD licensed.
>
They are talking about an EFI FAT driver with a BSD compatible license, not a
BSD driver.
The edk2 EFI FAT driver has a license that matches the FAT32 spec it was coded
against, but that license restricts the usage of the code to EFI. This is not
deemed a GPL compatible license, so that causes issues with down stream GPL
projects of the edk2 as there is a binary for the EFI FAT driver checked into
the main branch of the edk2. The source to the edk2 EFI FAT driver is separate
from the edk2 based on its funky license.
Thanks,
Andrew Fish
>
> Alex
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
it.
>
> Thanks for the pointers
>
This history of issues is why we should remove the binary FAT driver from the
common repo, so we accommodate the realities of all the down stream partners.
Thanks,
Andrew Fish
PS Nice to see the FOSS and traditional PC folks l
> On Sep 9, 2015, at 11:19 PM, Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de> wrote:
>
>
>
>> Am 10.09.2015 um 07:32 schrieb Jordan Justen <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com>:
>>
>> On 2015-09-09 20:26:54, Andrew Fish wrote:
>>>> On Sep 9, 2015, at 5:41 PM,
> On Sep 9, 2015, at 10:57 AM, Jordan Justen <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On 2015-09-09 10:04:50, Andrew Fish wrote:
>>
>>> On Sep 9, 2015, at 9:17 AM, Jordan Justen <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> So, relate
guess it is some kind of
civil disobedience. it does not mater what license you strap on the code the
the device makers still have to “pay the man”.
Thanks,
Andrew Fish
PS As I stated before I’m fine removing all the binaries from the main repo, as
you don’t really want binaries in yo
> On Sep 9, 2015, at 5:41 PM, Jordan Justen <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On 2015-09-09 16:05:20, Andrew Fish wrote:
>>
>>> On Sep 9, 2015, at 3:24 PM, Jordan Justen <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2015-09-09
o the solution is to keep everything in the tree working on master.
We should fix the edk2 process, and place a process in place to communicate
pending non backward compatible changes in the edk2 to down stream consumers.
Don’t forget a lot (majority) of edk2 based products that ship today live in
sees like a good answer.
Thanks,
Andrew Fish
I'll post my patch series soon; my idea that is relevant for this
discussion is at its beginning (and a later patch also displays how I
mean it to be used). We can discuss it there too if you like.
Thanks
Laszlo
10 matches
Mail list logo
