Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 00/14] linux: generalize sections, ranges and linker tables

2017-01-09 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 19:12 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 18:27 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 06:58 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > The only architecture that was not tested was avr32 and that is > > > bec

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 00/14] linux: generalize sections, ranges and linker tables

2017-01-09 Thread Andy Shevchenko
/r/20161222023811.21246-1-mcg...@kernel.org > [1] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mcgrof/linux- > next.git/log/?h=20170109-linker-tables-v6 Series is fine to me FWIW: Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> > > Luis R. Rodriguez (14): >  

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 4/7] x86: put msr-index.h in uapi

2017-01-06 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dich...@6wind.com> wrote: > This header file is exported, thus move it to uapi. Just hint for the future: -M (move) -C (copy) -D (delete) [though this is NOT for applying] -- With Best Regards, Andy S

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 04/14] tables.h: add linker table support

2017-01-06 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 10:00 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcg...@kernel.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 11:47:14AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 11:25 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcg...@kernel.org> wrote: >> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 03:58:18P

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 04/14] tables.h: add linker table support

2017-01-04 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 11:25 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcg...@kernel.org> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 03:58:18PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Wed, 2016-12-21 at 18:38 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> > +#define LINKTABLE_FOR_EACH(pointer, tbl) >> >>

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 09/14] jump_label: port __jump_table to linker tables

2016-12-22 Thread Andy Shevchenko
  asm_volatile_goto("1:\n\t" >    WASM(b) " %l[l_yes]\n\t" > -  ".pushsection __jump_table,  \"aw\"\n\t" > +  push_section_tbl_any(.data, __jump_table, aw) >    ".word 1b, %l[l_yes], %c0\n\t"

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 04/14] tables.h: add linker table support

2016-12-22 Thread Andy Shevchenko
t; + err = (LINKTABLE_START(tbl)[i]).func (args); > \ > + err; Indentation here a bit confusing. > \ > +}) -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> Intel Finland Oy ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 01/14] x86/boot: enumerate documentation for the x86 hardware_subarch

2016-04-07 Thread Andy Shevchenko
hink 'SoC' (without quotes) will be better. > + *  for settop boxes and media devices, the use of a subarch > for CE4100 > + *  is more of a hack... -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> Intel Finland Oy ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86, microcode: Remove unnecessary paravirt_enabled check

2016-02-19 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 01:00:35PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> That what I see last with earlycon enabled + `debug` in cmdline: > > That doesn't help. Heh, rebuilt on clean repository -> ever

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86, microcode: Remove unnecessary paravirt_enabled check

2016-02-19 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevche...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de> wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:33:46PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>> commit 84aba677f009e20185aea

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86, microcode: Remove unnecessary paravirt_enabled check

2016-02-19 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:33:46PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> No, the commit 84aba677f009 as of today's linux-next on which I commented. > > You commented under the "> A subsequen

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86, microcode: Remove unnecessary paravirt_enabled check

2016-02-19 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:06:33PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> Sorry for being too late, but this commit breaks 32-bit kernel on >> Intel Medfield. Reverting the only commit from today's linux-n

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86, microcode: Remove unnecessary paravirt_enabled check

2016-02-19 Thread Andy Shevchenko
crocode/core.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c > @@ -623,7 +623,7 @@ int __init microcode_init(void) > struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = _cpu_data; > int error; > > - if (paravirt_enabled() || dis_ucode_ldr) > + if (dis_ucode_ldr) >