On 11/24/15 21:05, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
[...]
> > >
> > > This bug can be fixed either later by patch 5 which introduces a
> > > common function hvm_scale_tsc() to scale TSC, or by replacing above
> > > underlined code with a simplified and inli
On 11/23/15 10:37, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 11/22/2015 12:54 PM, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> >Hi Jan, Boris and Aravind,
> >
> >(Sorry for sending such a long email and thanks for your patience)
>
> First, thank you very much for doing this.
>
> >
&
Hi Jan, Boris and Aravind,
(Sorry for sending such a long email and thanks for your patience)
Because this patchset also touches the existing SVM TSC ratio code, I
tested it on an AMD machine with an AMD A10-7700K CPU (3.4 GHz) that
supports SVM TSC ratio. There are two goals of the test:
(1)
On 11/09/15 16:15, Wei Liu wrote:
[...]
> * VMX TSC scaling support
> - Haozhong Zhang
I'm working on this feature and would like to see it in 4.7
Thanks,
Haozhong
[...]
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.o
<jbeul...@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <riku.voi...@linaro.org>
Tested on Ubuntu 14.04.3 with GCC 4.8.4 and no 'warn_unused_result'
warnings any more.
Tested-by: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zh...@intel.com>
> ---
> xen/tools/symbols.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file change
On 11/04/15 07:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 04.11.15 at 12:39, wrote:
> > In commit:
> >
> > d37d63d symbols: prefix static symbols with their source file names
> >
> > An unchecked fgets was added. This causes a compile error:
> >
> > symbols.c: In function
On 10/27/15 15:16, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
[...]
>
> Haozhong, Boris-
>
> I am planning to use a Fam10h system (older processor) and Fam15h Model 60h
> (newer processor) for the test case.
>
> Shall try to run the test on a single system as Haozhong mentioned on a
> different reply.
> I
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 08:17:29AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 28.09.15 at 09:13, wrote:
> > The existing hvm_set_guest_tsc_fixed() and hvm_get_guest_tsc_fixed()
> > calculate the guest TSC by adding the TSC offset to the host TSC. When
> > the TSC scaling is
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 02:15:53AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 27.10.15 at 02:54, wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 08:17:29AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 28.09.15 at 09:13, wrote:
> >> > The existing hvm_set_guest_tsc_fixed()
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 09:10:19AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 10/27/2015 04:44 AM, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> >On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 08:17:29AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>>>>On 28.09.15 at 09:13, <haozhong.zh...@intel.com> wrote:
> >
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 07:29:44AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 28.09.15 at 09:13, wrote:
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > @@ -1102,11 +1102,26 @@ static void vmx_handle_cd(struct vcpu *v, unsigned
> > long value)
> >
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 07:19:04AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 28.09.15 at 09:13, wrote:
> > @@ -1805,6 +1810,8 @@ void vmcs_dump_vcpu(struct vcpu *v)
> > printk("IDTVectoring: info=%08x errcode=%08x\n",
> > vmr32(IDT_VECTORING_INFO),
ITING)
>
> but the *_VMWRITE_ALL define is missing on your diff for Patch 10..
>
> Maybe I am missing something?
>
> Thanks,
> -Aravind.
Hi Aravind,
This patchset has been sent out for quite a while and is based on
commit 9cc1346. Something has changed in master and broken the
> it writes the TSC scaling ratio to VMCS field TSC_MULTIPLIER.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zh...@intel.com>
>
> Looking at this (last non-tools one) patch, I wonder how if this is
> needed things can be correct at the point of the series prior t
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 08:17:29AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 28.09.15 at 09:13, wrote:
> > The existing hvm_set_guest_tsc_fixed() and hvm_get_guest_tsc_fixed()
> > calculate the guest TSC by adding the TSC offset to the host TSC. When
> > the TSC scaling is
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 07:13:07AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 28.09.15 at 09:13, wrote:
> > This patch adds a field tsc_scaling_ratio in struct arch_vcpu to
>
> Why not in struct hvm_vcpu? Are you intending any use for PV guests?
>
> > ---
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 01:59:46AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 23.10.15 at 09:44, wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 07:13:07AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 28.09.15 at 09:13, wrote:
>
> Please remember to trim your replies.
>
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 02:31:11AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 23.10.15 at 10:18, wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 01:59:46AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 23.10.15 at 09:44, wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 07:13:07AM
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 03:19:19PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 10/22/2015 01:12 PM, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> >On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:55:00AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> >>On 09/28/2015 03:13 AM, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> >>>If VMX TSC scaling is enable
ferent between VMX
> > and SVM. This patch makes the architecture code to collect the number of
> > fractional bits and other related information into fields of struct
> > hvm_function_table so that they can be used in the common code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang <ha
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:50:18AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 09/28/2015 03:13 AM, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> >This patch makes the pvclock return the scaled host TSC and
> >corresponding scaling parameters to HVM domains if guest TSC is not
> >emulated and T
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:05:39AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 22.10.15 at 17:55, wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 07:13:07AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 28.09.15 at 09:13, wrote:
> >> > +{
> >> > +
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 08:51:13AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 22.10.15 at 16:40, wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 06:53:27AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 28.09.15 at 09:13, wrote:
> >> > ---
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 08:17:29AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 28.09.15 at 09:13, wrote:
> > The existing hvm_set_guest_tsc_fixed() and hvm_get_guest_tsc_fixed()
> > calculate the guest TSC by adding the TSC offset to the host TSC. When
> > the TSC scaling is
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:44:52AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 10/22/2015 10:17 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 28.09.15 at 09:13, wrote:
> >>The existing hvm_set_guest_tsc_fixed() and hvm_get_guest_tsc_fixed()
> >>calculate the guest TSC by adding the TSC offset
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 07:13:07AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 28.09.15 at 09:13, wrote:
> > This patch adds a field tsc_scaling_ratio in struct arch_vcpu to
>
> Why not in struct hvm_vcpu? Are you intending any use for PV guests?
>
No, I'll move
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:55:00AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 09/28/2015 03:13 AM, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> >If VMX TSC scaling is enabled and no TSC emulation is used,
> >vmx_set_tsc_offset() will calculate the TSC offset by substracting the
> >scaled host TSC from
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 03:40:01AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 14.10.15 at 04:45, wrote:
> > However, patch 2 is still necessary. The existing tsc_get_info() uses
> > the host TSC frequency as the guest TSC frequency for a domain in
> > TSC_MODE_DEFAULT, which
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 04:20:57AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 14.10.15 at 12:00, wrote:
> > Sounds reasonable. A better patch 2 may look like
> >
> > - *gtsc_khz = cpu_khz;
> > + if ( is_hvm_domain(d) && cpu_has_tsc_ratio )
> > + *gtsc_khz = d->arch.tsc_khz;
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 12:51:32AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 28.09.15 at 09:13, wrote:
> > When the TSC mode of a domain is TSC_MODE_DEFAULT and no TSC emulation
> > is used, the existing tsc_get_info() calculates elapsed_nsec by scaling
> > the host TSC with a
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 11:37:06AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 10/09/2015 10:39 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 09.10.15 at 15:41, wrote:
> >>On 10/09/2015 02:51 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>On 28.09.15 at 09:13, wrote:
> When
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 12:51:32AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 28.09.15 at 09:13, wrote:
> > When the TSC mode of a domain is TSC_MODE_DEFAULT and no TSC emulation
> > is used, the existing tsc_get_info() calculates elapsed_nsec by scaling
> > the host TSC with a
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 12:31:53PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 10/09/2015 12:19 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 09.10.15 at 18:09, wrote:
> >>On 10/09/2015 11:11 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>On 09.10.15 at 16:00, wrote:
> On Fri,
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 09:41:36AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 10/09/2015 02:51 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 28.09.15 at 09:13, wrote:
> >>When the TSC mode of a domain is TSC_MODE_DEFAULT and no TSC emulation
> >>is used, the existing tsc_get_info() calculates
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:07:17AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 08:40 +0800, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> > > > @@ -1462,6 +1462,28 @@ static void parse_config_data(const char
> > > > *config_source,
> > > > }
> > > >
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:28:38AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 11:24 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > On 29/09/15 11:13, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:04:14AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2015-09-28 at 15:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:25:56AM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 29/09/15 11:02, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:33:14AM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >> On 29/09/15 02:07, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 12:02:08P
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:20:21AM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 08:40:23AM +0800, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 03:19:25PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 03:13:58PM +0800, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> > > > This
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:04:14AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-09-28 at 15:13 +0800, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> > This patch adds an option 'vtsc_khz' to allow users to set vcpu's TSC
> > rate in KHz. In the case that tsc_mode = 'default', the default value of
> &
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:33:14AM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 29/09/15 02:07, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 12:02:08PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> >> On 09/28/2015 03:13 AM, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> >>> This patch adds a new call-ba
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 03:37:06PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 22:01 +0800, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 02:56:12PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > > On 29/09/15 14:53, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at
This patch adds the detection and initialization code for VMX TSC
scaling.
Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zh...@intel.com>
---
xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.c| 11 +--
xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c | 9 +
xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.h | 7 +++
3
This patch adds a new call-back setup_tsc_scaling in struct
hvm_function_table to apply the TSC scaling ratio to hardware. For VMX,
it writes the TSC scaling ratio to VMCS field TSC_MULTIPLIER.
Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zh...@intel.com>
---
xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c| 1
This patch makes the pvclock return the scaled host TSC and
corresponding scaling parameters to HVM domains if guest TSC is not
emulated and TSC scaling is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zh...@intel.com>
---
xen/arch/x86/time.c | 15 ---
1 file chang
If VMX TSC scaling is enabled and no TSC emulation is used,
vmx_set_tsc_offset() will calculate the TSC offset by substracting the
scaled host TSC from the current guest TSC.
Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zh...@intel.com>
---
xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c | 15 +++
This patch implements a common function hvm_scale_tsc() to calculate the
scaling of TSC by using TSC scaling information which is collected by
architecture code.
Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zh...@intel.com>
---
xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
The existing hvm_set_guest_tsc_fixed() and hvm_get_guest_tsc_fixed()
calculate the guest TSC by adding the TSC offset to the host TSC. When
the TSC scaling is enabled, the host TSC should be scaled first. This
patch adds the scaling logic to those two functions.
Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang
This patch adds a field tsc_scaling_ratio in struct arch_vcpu to
represent the TSC scaling ratio, and sets it up when tsc_set_info() is
called for a vcpu or a vcpu is restored or reset.
Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zh...@intel.com>
---
xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
MX TSC scaling (as well as SVM TSC
ratio).
Haozhong Zhang (13):
x86/time.c: Use system time to calculate elapsed_nsec in
tsc_get_info()
x86/time.c: Get the correct guest TSC rate in tsc_get_info()
x86/hvm: Collect information of TSC scaling ratio
x86/hvm: Setup TSC scaling ratio
x
rate. This patch fixes this problem by using
the system time as elapsed_nsec.
Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zh...@intel.com>
---
xen/arch/x86/time.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/time.c b/xen/arch/x86/time.c
index bbb7e6c..a345efb
. In order to keep consistent to tsc_set_info(), this patch make
tsc_get_info() use the value set by tsc_set_info() as the guest TSC
rate.
Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zh...@intel.com>
---
xen/arch/x86/time.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/xen/ar
This patch uses hvm_funcs.tsc_scaling_supported instead of the
architecture code to detect the TSC scaling support.
Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zh...@intel.com>
---
xen/arch/x86/time.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/time.c
hvm_function_table so that they can be used in the common code.
Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zh...@intel.com>
---
xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c| 9 +
xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c| 2 ++
xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/hvm.h | 13 +
xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/svm/svm.
Both VMX and SVM saves/loads vcpu's TSC when saving/loading vcpu's
context, so this patch moves saving/loading vcpu's TSC to the common
function hvm_save_cpu_ctxt()/hvm_load_cpu_ctxt().
Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zh...@intel.com>
---
xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c | 4
xen/ar
Hi Julien,
Thank you for the comments!
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 12:47:24PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 28/09/15 08:13, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> > This patch adds an option 'vtsc_khz' to allow users to set vcpu's TSC
> > rate in KHz. In the case that tsc_mode = '
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 12:36:51PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 09/28/2015 03:13 AM, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> >This patch makes the pvclock return the scaled host TSC and
> >corresponding scaling parameters to HVM domains if guest TSC is not
> >emulated and T
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 03:19:25PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 03:13:58PM +0800, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> > This patch adds an option 'vtsc_khz' to allow users to set vcpu's TSC
> > rate in KHz. In the case that tsc_mode = 'default', the default value of
> &
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 12:02:08PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 09/28/2015 03:13 AM, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> >This patch adds a new call-back setup_tsc_scaling in struct
> >hvm_function_table to apply the TSC scaling ratio to hardware. For VMX,
> >it writes the TSC
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 08:45:58AM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 01:35:13PM +0800, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> > Remove trailing whitespaces in xen-mceinj.c.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zh...@intel.com>
>
> Acked-by: Wei Liu &l
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 08:58:41AM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 03:52:39PM +0800, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 08:45:58AM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 01:35:13PM +0800, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> > > > Remo
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 02:50:27PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 15/09/15 14:42, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> >
> >>> +mfn = mfn_x(get_gfn(d, gpfn, ));
> >>> +
> >>> +if (mfn == INVALID_MFN) {
> >>> +
-by: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zh...@intel.com>
---
tools/tests/mce-test/tools/xen-mceinj.c | 152 ++--
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 123 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/tests/mce-test/tools/xen-mceinj.c
b/tools/tests/mce-test/tools/xen-mceinj.c
index 71813c6..3
Remove trailing whitespaces and fix indentations in mce.c and xen_mca.h.
Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zh...@intel.com>
---
xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 10 +-
xen/include/public/arch-x86/xen-mca.h | 30 +++---
2 files changed, 20 inse
-mceinj.c.
7. Update the commit message of patch 4 to explicitly state that the
address translation is moved to the hypervisor.
Haozhong Zhang (4):
x86/mce: Fix code style
tools/xen-mceinj: Fix code style
x86/mce: Translate passed-in GPA to host machine address
tools/xen-mceinj: Pass i
This patch adds a new flag MC_MSRINJ_F_GPADDR to
xen_mc_msrinject.mcinj_flags, and makes do_mca() to translate the
guest physical address passed-in through
xen_mc_msrinject.mcinj_msr[i].value to the host machine address if
this flag is present.
Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong
Remove trailing whitespaces in xen-mceinj.c.
Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zh...@intel.com>
---
tools/tests/mce-test/tools/xen-mceinj.c | 66 -
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/tests/mce-test/tools/xen-mcein
This patch removes the address translation in xen-mceinj which
translates the guest physical address passed-in through the argument
of '-p' to the host machine address.
Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zh...@intel.com>
---
tools/tests/mce-test/tools/xen-mceinj.c
Remove trailing spaces in xen-mceinj.c.
Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zh...@intel.com>
---
tools/tests/mce-test/tools/xen-mceinj.c | 16
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/tests/mce-test/tools/xen-mceinj.c
b/tools/tests/mce-test
by moving the translation from
xen-mceinj to the hypervisor, so that it is not necessary to use
XEN_DOMCTL_getmemlist.
The first two patches just fix serval code-style issues, while the
other two are the actual fix.
Haozhong Zhang (4):
x86/mce: Fix code style
tools/mceinject: Fix code style
x86/mce:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:14:26AM +0200, Egger, Christoph wrote:
> On 2015/09/15 10:29, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> > This patch adds a new flag MC_MSRINJ_F_GPADDR to
> > xen_mc_msrinject.mcinj_flags, and makes do_mca() to translate the
> > guest physical addr
Remove trailing spaces and fix indentations in mce.c and xen-mca.h.
Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zh...@intel.com>
---
xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 10 +-
xen/include/public/arch-x86/xen-mca.h | 28 ++--
2 files changed, 19 insertions(
This patch adds a new flag MC_MSRINJ_F_GPADDR to
xen_mc_msrinject.mcinj_flags, and makes do_mca() to translate the
guest physical address passed-in through
xen_mc_msrinject.mcinj_msr[i].value to the host machine address if
this flag is present.
Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:20:20AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 16:29 +0800, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> > This patch removes the address translation in xen-mceinj which
> > translates the guest physical address passed-in through the argument
> > of '-p
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 12:17:01PM +0200, Egger, Christoph wrote:
> On 2015/09/15 10:29, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> > This patch removes the address translation in xen-mceinj which
> > translates the guest physical address passed-in through the argument
> > of '-p' to the
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 07:24:34AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 15.09.15 at 10:29, wrote:
> > @@ -1422,6 +1423,38 @@ long do_mca(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_mc_t)
> > u_xen_mc)
> > if (mc_msrinject->mcinj_count == 0)
> > return 0;
> >
> > +
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 07:13:16AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 15.09.15 at 10:29, wrote:
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> > @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ void x86_mce_callback_register(x86_mce_callback_t
> > cbfunc)
> >
601 - 676 of 676 matches
Mail list logo