Re: [Xen-devel] [edk2] [PATCH v2] OvmfPkg/build.sh: Make GCC5 the default toolchain, catch GCC43 and earlier

2016-11-22 Thread Jordan Justen
e error for GCC < 4.4 Patch is Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com> I'll let Laszlo take a look too. Thanks for the contribution! -Jordan > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62 > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0 > Signed-of

[Xen-devel] EDK II & GPL - Re: [edk2] OVMF BoF @ KVM Forum 2015

2015-09-09 Thread Jordan Justen
On 2015-09-09 01:57:51, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 08/10/15 18:24, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > > Hi. > > > > Let's do an OVMF BoF at this year's KVM Forum too. > > Here's a preliminary task list, after some off-list discussion (I tried > to incorporate comments): > > - create GPL'd fork called "ovmf"

Re: [Xen-devel] [edk2] EDK II & GPL - Re: OVMF BoF @ KVM Forum 2015

2015-09-09 Thread Jordan Justen
that doesn't also apply to FatBinPkg.) -Jordan > -Original Message- > From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Jordan > Justen > Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2015 12:58 PM > To: Andrew Fish <af...@apple.com> > Cc: Lenny Szub

Re: [Xen-devel] [edk2] EDK II & GPL - Re: OVMF BoF @ KVM Forum 2015

2015-09-09 Thread Jordan Justen
On 2015-09-09 16:05:20, Andrew Fish wrote: > > > On Sep 9, 2015, at 3:24 PM, Jordan Justen <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com> wrote: > > > > On 2015-09-09 12:11:26, El-Haj-Mahmoud, Samer wrote: > >> The recent expansions beyond BSD where all permissive licenses

Re: [Xen-devel] [edk2] EDK II & GPL - Re: OVMF BoF @ KVM Forum 2015

2015-09-09 Thread Jordan Justen
On 2015-09-09 20:26:54, Andrew Fish wrote: > > On Sep 9, 2015, at 5:41 PM, Jordan Justen <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com> wrote: > > On 2015-09-09 16:05:20, Andrew Fish wrote: > >> So you have a legal degree and are speaking on behalf of your > >> employer on this su

Re: [Xen-devel] [edk2] EDK II & GPL - Re: OVMF BoF @ KVM Forum 2015

2015-09-09 Thread Jordan Justen
On 2015-09-09 10:04:50, Andrew Fish wrote: > > > On Sep 9, 2015, at 9:17 AM, Jordan Justen <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com> wrote: > > > > So, related to this, I wonder how the community would feel about a > > GplDriverPkg. Would the community allow it as a n

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 14/29] MdePkg/BaseSynchronizationLib: implement 16-bit compare-exchange

2015-02-17 Thread Jordan Justen
Ard, For the subject, I think MdePkg/BaseSynchronizationLib: Add InterlockedCompareExchange16 would be better. Acked-by: Jordan Justen jordan.l.jus...@intel.com Thanks for working to move this to a common location. Mike, I think Anthony tested the IA32 and X64 implementations with Xen

Re: [Xen-devel] [edk2] [PATCH] OvmfPkg: AcpiPlatformDxe: PCI enumeration may be disabled

2015-02-14 Thread Jordan Justen
On 2015-02-14 08:38:37, Laszlo Ersek wrote: On 02/12/15 21:53, Jordan Justen wrote: I think gEfiPciEnumerationCompleteProtocolGuid should be installed by MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe, even when PcdPciDisableBusEnumeration is set. Ray's main feedback seemed to be that we need to make

Re: [Xen-devel] [edk2] [PATCH] MdeModulePkg: mark completion of PCI enumeration in PciEnumeratorLight

2015-02-12 Thread Jordan Justen
1.0 Signed-off-by: Wei Liu wei.l...@citrix.com Cc: Feng Tian feng.t...@intel.com Cc: Anthony Perard anthony.per...@citrix.com Cc: Laszlo Ersek ler...@redhat.com Cc: Jordan Justen jordan.l.jus...@intel.com --- MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe/PciEnumeratorSupport.c | 15 ++- 1

Re: [Xen-devel] [edk2] [PATCH] OvmfPkg: AcpiPlatformDxe: PCI enumeration may be disabled

2015-02-12 Thread Jordan Justen
I think gEfiPciEnumerationCompleteProtocolGuid should be installed by MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe, even when PcdPciDisableBusEnumeration is set. Ray's main feedback seemed to be that we need to make sure PciBusDxe only installs the protocol once. (I'll also reply to the other related patch

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 00/29] Xen/ARM guest support

2015-02-12 Thread Jordan Justen
Do you have this in a public branch based on this tree? https://github.com/tianocore/edk2 On 2015-02-12 03:18:52, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: This series implements support for executing Tianocore inside a Xen guest domain on 64-bit ARM systems (AArch64) The first part addresses ARM platform

Re: [Xen-devel] [edk2] [PATCH v3 21/27] Ovmf/Xen: add ARM and AArch64 support to XenBusDxe

2015-02-07 Thread Jordan Justen
On 2015-02-05 01:56:04, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: On 4 February 2015 at 21:10, Jordan Justen jordan.l.jus...@intel.com wrote: On 2015-02-03 11:20:06, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: This patch adds support to XenBusDxe for executing on ARM and AArch64 machines (the former only when built with GCC

Re: [Xen-devel] [edk2] [PATCH v3 21/27] Ovmf/Xen: add ARM and AArch64 support to XenBusDxe

2015-02-04 Thread Jordan Justen
On 2015-02-03 11:20:06, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: This patch adds support to XenBusDxe for executing on ARM and AArch64 machines (the former only when built with GCC). Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0 Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheu...@linaro.org ---