On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 05:12:54 -0600
"Jan Beulich" wrote:
> >>> On 18.08.16 at 12:16, wrote:
> > On 18/08/16 11:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 17.08.16 at 22:32, wrote:
> >>>Looking at the kernel it assumes that WB is ok for 640KB->1MB.
> >>>The comment says:
> >>>" /* Low IS
> table development go under copyleft-next, Rusty recently asked for code
> to go in prior to the license tag being added denoting this license as
> GPL-compatible [3] -- I had noted in the patch submission which annotated
> copyleft-next's compatibility to GPLv2 that copyleft-next is the license
>
On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 13:25:14 +0100
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:59:28PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > Some hardware (e.g. Dell Studio laptops) require special functions to
> > be called on physical cpu 0 in order to avoid occasional hangs. When
> > running as dom0 under Xe
> The fact what include/linux/license.h:license_is_gpl_compatible includes
> "Dual MIT/GPL" as an option seems to suggest that it is enough of a thing
> to be validly used as the contents of a MODULE_LICENSE() thing.
Yes. The MIT licence most definitely exists, and people know what it
means.
Also
