On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>
>
> On 09/07/2015 12:30, Manish Jaggi wrote:
>>
>> On Thursday 09 July 2015 01:38 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>>>
>>> On 09/07/2015 08:13, Manish Jaggi wrote:
>
>
> If this was a domctl there might be scope for accepting an
> implem
I quirk" disable the quirk for boards using
> the new firmware.
>
> It is known that the quirk is fragile and cause performance regression.
> Given that firmware is available for people having the board, I think
> we can request the user to upgrade to the latest version.
>
>
Hi Ian,
On 15 May 2015 at 21:35, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-05-15 at 16:51 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
>> The commit 50dcb3de603927db2fd87ba09e29c817415aaa44 "xen: arm: X-Gene Storm
>> check GIC DIST address for EOI quirk" disable the quirk for boards using
>> the new firmware.
>
> That re
Hi Julien,
On 7 May 2015 at 17:20, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Pranav,
>
> On 07/05/15 12:12, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote:
>> On 7 May 2015 at 15:11, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 14:19 +0530, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote:
>>>> Hi Juli
Hi Ian,
On 7 May 2015 at 15:11, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 14:19 +0530, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote:
>> Hi Julien,
>>
>> On 5 May 2015 at 19:22, Julien Grall wrote:
>> > Hi Pranav,
>> >
>> > On 29/04/15 10:38, Pranavkum
Hi Julien,
On 5 May 2015 at 19:22, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Pranav,
>
> On 29/04/15 10:38, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote:
>> In old X-Gene Storm firmware and DT, secure mode addresses have been
>> mentioned in GICv2 node. In this case maintenance interrupt is used
>&g
-devel/2014-07/msg01263.html
Signed-off-by: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
Tested-by: Christoffer Dall
---
ChangeLog:
V3:
- Indentation fixes and other misc comments on V2.
V2:
- Fine tune interrupt controller node search as per comments on V1 patch
- Incorporating other misc comments on V1.
V1
Hi Julien,
On 25 April 2015 at 21:48, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Pranav,
>
> On 24/04/2015 15:46, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote:
>>
>> In old X-Gene Storm firmware and DT, secure mode addresses have been
>> mentioned in GICv2 node. In this case maintenance interrupt i
-devel/2014-07/msg01263.html
ChangeLog:
V2:
- Fine tune interrupt controller node search as per comments on V1 patch
- Incorporating other misc comments on V1.
V1:
- Initial patch.
Tested-by: Christoffer Dall
Signed-off-by: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
---
xen/arch/arm/platforms/xgene-storm.c
Hi Ian,
On 15 April 2015 at 21:46, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-04-07 at 11:29 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
>> >> This would avoid to have this loop and rely on there is always only one
>> >> interrupt controller in the DT.
>> >
>> > That is true, however we do know that on this SoC there is
On 8 April 2015 at 13:58, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> Hi Pranav,
>
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 02:24:01PM +0530, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote:
>> In old X-Gene Storm firmware and DT, secure mode addresses have been
>> mentioned in GICv2 node. In this case maintenance interrupt
-devel/2014-07/msg01263.html
Signed-off-by: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
---
xen/arch/arm/platforms/xgene-storm.c | 37 +-
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/platforms/xgene-storm.c
b/xen/arch/arm/platforms/xgene-storm.c
index
Hi Julien,
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 8:47 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 26/02/15 14:46, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote:
>> Hi
>
> Hi Pranavkumar,
>
>> Also if we just show only one vITS (or only one Virtual v2m frame)
>> instead of two vITS
>> then actual h
Hi
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Vijay Kilari wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 08:03 +0530, Manish Jaggi wrote:
>>> On 24/02/15 7:13 pm, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> > On 24/02/15 00:23, Manish Jaggi wrote:
>>> >>> Because you have to parse all
: /* PCIe3 */
> +ret = xgene_storm_pcie_specific_mapping(d,
> +node,
> +0x0a0UL, 0x0c0UL, 0xd4);
> +break;
> + case 0x1f51: /* PCIe4 */
> +ret = xgene_storm_pcie_specific_mapping(d,
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
