Re: [Xen-devel] [Design RFC] Towards work-conserving RTDS scheduler

2016-08-18 Thread Meng Xu
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 09:57 -0400, Meng Xu wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Dario Faggioli >> wrote: >> > >> > I'm just thinking out loud and >> > wondering: >> > - could it

Re: [Xen-devel] [Design RFC] Towards work-conserving RTDS scheduler

2016-08-18 Thread Dario Faggioli
On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 09:57 -0400, Meng Xu wrote: > On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Dario Faggioli > wrote: > > > > I'm just thinking out loud and > > wondering: > >  - could it be useful to have a scheduling analysis in place for > > the > >    scheduler in work

Re: [Xen-devel] [Design RFC] Towards work-conserving RTDS scheduler

2016-08-09 Thread Meng Xu
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 01:15 -0400, Meng Xu wrote: >> Hi Dario, >> > Hi, > >> I'm thinking about changing the current RTDS scheduler to >> work-conserving version as we briefly discussed before. >> Below is a design

Re: [Xen-devel] [Design RFC] Towards work-conserving RTDS scheduler

2016-08-08 Thread Dario Faggioli
On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 01:15 -0400, Meng Xu wrote: > Hi Dario, > Hi, > I'm thinking about changing the current RTDS scheduler to > work-conserving version as we briefly discussed before. > Below is a design of the work-conserving RTDS. > I'm hoping to get your feedback about the design ideas

[Xen-devel] [Design RFC] Towards work-conserving RTDS scheduler

2016-08-03 Thread Meng Xu
Hi Dario, I'm thinking about changing the current RTDS scheduler to work-conserving version as we briefly discussed before. Below is a design of the work-conserving RTDS. I'm hoping to get your feedback about the design ideas first before I start writing it in code. I think the code change