On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 08:19:09PM +0100, Norbert Manthey wrote:
> Hi Wei,
>
> as far as I can tell, patch 1 has already been added:
>
> http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commit;h=71af7d4220227529ea43b898683d4d2e68a90ffd
>
Oh yes, I missed that.
Hi Wei,
as far as I can tell, patch 1 has already been added:
http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commit;h=71af7d4220227529ea43b898683d4d2e68a90ffd
Best,
Norbert
On 02/20/2017 05:58 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:31:01AM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 17/02/17 10:47,
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:31:01AM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 17/02/17 10:47, Norbert Manthey wrote:
> > The variable virq_port of type uint32_t was compared to being greater than
> > -1. This check always results in false for unsigned data types, resulting
> > in never cleaning up the
On 17/02/17 10:47, Norbert Manthey wrote:
> The variable virq_port of type uint32_t was compared to being greater than
> -1. This check always results in false for unsigned data types, resulting
> in never cleaning up the memory. Furthermore, the initialization with a
> negative variable for an
The variable virq_port of type uint32_t was compared to being greater than
-1. This check always results in false for unsigned data types, resulting
in never cleaning up the memory. Furthermore, the initialization with a
negative variable for an unsigned type has been fixed.
Signed-off-by:
