On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 03:25 +, Hu, Robert wrote:
Though no harm as far as I see now, I cannot forcast any harm in the
future. Anyway, this 'nestedhvm' is for a nested usage. Better to enable
it when we are actually going enable a nested environment.
Practically, we can do it in either
On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 05:13 +, Pang, LongtaoX wrote:
So, maybe I should write some code in 'ts-nested-setup' script to
implement ssh into L1, edit sources.list and comment out the CDROM
repo entry.
Please do it in ts-debian-hvm-install, either as a postinst step or,
better (IMHO), by
Ian Campbell writes (Re: [OSSTEST Nested PATCH 2/6] Add and expose some
testsupport APIs):
On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 03:34 +, Hu, Robert wrote:
Make it an option to the function which creates the configuration in the
first place. Quoting myself from earlier in this very thread:
Then we
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 16:20 +, Pang, LongtaoX wrote:
The editconfig_cd thing -- yet another thing which Ian questioned
and which it was agreed you would change but you haven't.
For this question, I have sent a mail about it.(2015-03-04) After
finishing L1 guest VM
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:45:55PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 16:20 +, Pang, LongtaoX wrote:
The editconfig_cd thing -- yet another thing which Ian questioned
and which it was agreed you would change but you haven't.
For this question, I have
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 06:31 +, Hu, Robert wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Ian Campbell [mailto:ian.campb...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 8:20 PM
To: Pang, LongtaoX
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org; ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com; wei.l...@citrix.com;
Hu, Robert
Subject:
The editconfig_cd thing -- yet another thing which Ian questioned
and which it was agreed you would change but you haven't.
For this question, I have sent a mail about it.(2015-03-04) After
finishing L1 guest VM installation, we need to change L1 guest boot
sequence from ISO
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 17:19 +, Wei Liu wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:20:08PM +, Pang, LongtaoX wrote:
The editconfig_cd thing -- yet another thing which Ian questioned
and which it was agreed you would change but you haven't.
For this question, I have sent a
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:20:08PM +, Pang, LongtaoX wrote:
The editconfig_cd thing -- yet another thing which Ian questioned
and which it was agreed you would change but you haven't.
For this question, I have sent a mail about it.(2015-03-04) After
finishing L1 guest
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 17:29 +, Wei Liu wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:45:55PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 16:20 +, Pang, LongtaoX wrote:
The editconfig_cd thing -- yet another thing which Ian questioned
and which it was agreed you would change
-Original Message-
From: Ian Campbell [mailto:ian.campb...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 5:50 PM
To: Hu, Robert
Cc: Pang, LongtaoX; xen-devel@lists.xen.org; ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com;
wei.l...@citrix.com
Subject: Re: [OSSTEST Nested PATCH 2/6] Add and expose some
-Original Message-
From: Ian Campbell [mailto:ian.campb...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 5:50 PM
To: Hu, Robert
Cc: Pang, LongtaoX; xen-devel@lists.xen.org; ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com;
wei.l...@citrix.com
Subject: Re: [OSSTEST Nested PATCH 2/6] Add and expose some
-Original Message-
From: Ian Campbell [mailto:ian.campb...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 8:20 PM
To: Pang, LongtaoX
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org; ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com; wei.l...@citrix.com;
Hu, Robert
Subject: Re: [OSSTEST Nested PATCH 2/6] Add and expose some
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 12:09 +, Pang, LongtaoX wrote:
Add xen-devel in mail loop.
Here is what I wrong in reply to the private version without noticing
that it was private.
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 11:59 +, Pang, LongtaoX wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Ian Campbell
Add xen-devel in mail loop.
-Original Message-
From: Pang, LongtaoX
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 7:59 PM
To: 'Ian Campbell'
Cc: ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com; wei.l...@citrix.com; Hu, Robert
Subject: RE: [OSSTEST Nested PATCH 2/6] Add and expose some testsupport
APIs
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 12:59 +, Pang, LongtaoX wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Ian Campbell [mailto:ian.campb...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 8:20 PM
To: Pang, LongtaoX
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org; ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com; wei.l...@citrix.com;
Hu, Robert
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 14:16 -0400, longtao.pang wrote:
From: longtao.pang longtaox.p...@intel.com
1. Designate vif model to 'e1000', otherwise, with default device model,
the L1 eth0 interface disappear, hence xenbridge cannot work.
Maybe this limitation can be removed later after some fix
From: longtao.pang longtaox.p...@intel.com
1. Designate vif model to 'e1000', otherwise, with default device model,
the L1 eth0 interface disappear, hence xenbridge cannot work.
Maybe this limitation can be removed later after some fix it. For now, we
have to accomodate to it.
2. Since reboot L1
18 matches
Mail list logo
