Anthony PERARD writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH v11 11/20] ts-openstack-deploy:
Increase fd and memory limits for rabbitmq"):
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 04:34:41PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > And if one isn't using systemd ?
>
> I guess it would have to fix devstack. Also, the default is 1k,
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 04:34:41PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Anthony PERARD writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH v11 11/20] ts-openstack-deploy:
> Increase fd and memory limits for rabbitmq"):
> > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 02:41:59PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > Anthony PERARD writes ("[OSSTEST PATCH
Anthony PERARD writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH v11 11/20] ts-openstack-deploy:
Increase fd and memory limits for rabbitmq"):
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 02:41:59PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Anthony PERARD writes ("[OSSTEST PATCH v11 11/20] ts-openstack-deploy:
> > Increase fd and memory limits for
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 02:41:59PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Anthony PERARD writes ("[OSSTEST PATCH v11 11/20] ts-openstack-deploy:
> Increase fd and memory limits for rabbitmq"):
> > Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD
>
> Does this not mean that the upstream defaults
Anthony PERARD writes ("[OSSTEST PATCH v11 11/20] ts-openstack-deploy: Increase
fd and memory limits for rabbitmq"):
> Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD
Does this not mean that the upstream defaults are wrong ?
In general I like to see at least an upstream bug report url
Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD
---
ts-openstack-deploy | 14 ++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/ts-openstack-deploy b/ts-openstack-deploy
index 2107760..04317a0 100755
--- a/ts-openstack-deploy
+++ b/ts-openstack-deploy
@@ -130,6 +130,20 @@