Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fixes to Xen pcifront and pciback (v1)

2016-02-15 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 02:38:22PM +, David Vrabel wrote: > On 15/02/16 14:35, David Vrabel wrote: > > On 11/02/16 21:10, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > >> Hey, > >> > >> These are patches that were developed for the Debian bug > >> 810379 which san Tommi had openned. > >> > >> The issue around

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fixes to Xen pcifront and pciback (v1)

2016-02-15 Thread David Vrabel
On 15/02/16 14:35, David Vrabel wrote: > On 11/02/16 21:10, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >> Hey, >> >> These are patches that were developed for the Debian bug >> 810379 which san Tommi had openned. >> >> The issue around from the two XSA fixes - which introduced >> this regression. > > Applied to

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fixes to Xen pcifront and pciback (v1)

2016-02-15 Thread David Vrabel
On 11/02/16 21:10, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > Hey, > > These are patches that were developed for the Debian bug > 810379 which san Tommi had openned. > > The issue around from the two XSA fixes - which introduced > this regression. Applied to for-linus-4.6, thanks. I rewrote some of the com

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fixes to Xen pcifront and pciback (v1)

2016-02-11 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Hey, These are patches that were developed for the Debian bug 810379 which san Tommi had openned. The issue around from the two XSA fixes - which introduced this regression. I am the person who developed them and my explanation for this regression oversight is that I tested for the 'exploit use-