On Mon, Jul 20, Wei Liu wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 11:16:34AM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 19.07.15 at 11:33, o...@aepfle.de wrote:
[ 198s] block-log.c:549:23: error: array subscript is above array
bounds [-Werror=array-bounds]
[
On 21.07.15 at 08:32, o...@aepfle.de wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, Wei Liu wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 11:16:34AM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 19.07.15 at 11:33, o...@aepfle.de wrote:
[ 198s] block-log.c:549:23: error: array subscript is above
On 07/21/2015 09:38 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 00:50 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
What is the longterm goal of that binary?
It being mostly unmaintained, it's probably a candidate for removal
not too far in the future.
George already posted a series to remove the in tree
On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 00:50 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
What is the longterm goal of that binary?
It being mostly unmaintained, it's probably a candidate for removal
not too far in the future.
George already posted a series to remove the in tree copy and treat
blktap2 as an out of tree
On Tue, Jul 21, Jan Beulich wrote:
But anyway, the primary question remains - isn't what you're seeing
a compiler bug? If yes, that's imo _yet another_ reason for doing a
minimal workaround (if any at all).
I dont think its a compiler bug. How should the compiler know that the
index variable
On 21.07.15 at 09:04, o...@aepfle.de wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, Jan Beulich wrote:
But anyway, the primary question remains - isn't what you're seeing
a compiler bug? If yes, that's imo _yet another_ reason for doing a
minimal workaround (if any at all).
I dont think its a compiler bug. How
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 11:16:34AM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 19.07.15 at 11:33, o...@aepfle.de wrote:
[ 198s] block-log.c:549:23: error: array subscript is above array bounds
[-Werror=array-bounds]
[ 198s] if (s-connections[i].id == id)
On Mon, Jul 20, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 19.07.15 at 11:33, o...@aepfle.de wrote:
[ 198s] block-log.c:549:23: error: array subscript is above array bounds
[-Werror=array-bounds]
[ 198s] if (s-connections[i].id == id)
[ 198s]^
So what makes the compiler
On 19.07.15 at 11:33, o...@aepfle.de wrote:
blktap2 fails to build with gcc5 because it fails to recognize that
there can be just one active connection (enforced in ctl_accept).
Rearrange the code to handle just a single connection.
Adjust two strerror calls to use errno instead -1 as
On 20.07.15 at 11:16, o...@aepfle.de wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 19.07.15 at 11:33, o...@aepfle.de wrote:
[ 198s] block-log.c:549:23: error: array subscript is above array bounds
[-Werror=array-bounds]
[ 198s] if (s-connections[i].id == id)
[ 198s]
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 19.07.15 at 11:33, o...@aepfle.de wrote:
blktap2 fails to build with gcc5 because it fails to recognize that
there can be just one active connection (enforced in ctl_accept).
Rearrange the code to handle just a single connection.
Adjust
blktap2 fails to build with gcc5 because it fails to recognize that
there can be just one active connection (enforced in ctl_accept).
Rearrange the code to handle just a single connection.
Adjust two strerror calls to use errno instead -1 as input.
[ 198s] block-log.c: In function
12 matches
Mail list logo
