On 08/12/14 08:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 06.12.14 at 01:05, wrote:
>> On 05/12/2014 16:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> > I didn't change ARM, as I wasn't sure how far ahead this call could be
>>> pulled.
>>
>> AFAIU, the new function only requires that the page table are setup
>> (because of the
>>> On 05.12.14 at 18:22, wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 04:55:24PM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> @@ -763,17 +762,28 @@ void __init console_init_postirq(void)
>> }
>> opt_conring_size = PAGE_SIZE << order;
>>
>> -spin_lock_irq(&console_lock);
>> +spin_lock_irqsave(&console_lock,
>>> On 06.12.14 at 01:05, wrote:
> On 05/12/2014 16:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > I didn't change ARM, as I wasn't sure how far ahead this call could be
>> pulled.
>
> AFAIU, the new function only requires that the page table are setup
> (because of the alloc_xenheap_pages).
>
> So console_init_
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 06:22:57PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 04:55:24PM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > ... when "conring_size=" was specified on the command line. We can't
> > really do this as early as we would want to when the option was not
> > specified, as the default
Hi Jan,
On 05/12/2014 16:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
> I didn't change ARM, as I wasn't sure how far ahead this call could be
pulled.
AFAIU, the new function only requires that the page table are setup
(because of the alloc_xenheap_pages).
So console_init_mem could be called right after console
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 04:55:24PM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> ... when "conring_size=" was specified on the command line. We can't
> really do this as early as we would want to when the option was not
> specified, as the default depends on knowing the system CPU count. Yet
> the parsing of the ACP
... when "conring_size=" was specified on the command line. We can't
really do this as early as we would want to when the option was not
specified, as the default depends on knowing the system CPU count. Yet
the parsing of the ACPI tables is one of the things that generates a
lot of output especial
