>>> On 04.03.15 at 13:08, wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 09:16 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> --- a/xen/common/sched_credit.c
>> +++ b/xen/common/sched_credit.c
>> @@ -292,11 +292,9 @@ __runq_remove(struct csched_vcpu *svc)
>> static inline int __vcpu_has_soft_affinity(const struct vcpu *vc,
>>
On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 09:16 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> --- a/xen/common/sched_credit.c
> +++ b/xen/common/sched_credit.c
> @@ -292,11 +292,9 @@ __runq_remove(struct csched_vcpu *svc)
> static inline int __vcpu_has_soft_affinity(const struct vcpu *vc,
>
As pointed out in the discussion of the patch at
http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-02/msg03256.html
generalizing the conditions here means code elsewhere doesn't need to
take into consideration internals of how load balancing in the credit
scheduler works.
Signed-off-by: Ja
