On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 2:37 AM, Tamas K Lengyel tkleng...@sec.in.tum.de
wrote:
The sharing vm_event ring being enabled is not necessary for mem_sharing
memops.
Signed-off-by: Tamas K Lengyel tkleng...@sec.in.tum.de
---
xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_sharing.c | 4
1 file changed, 4
The sharing vm_event ring being enabled is not necessary for mem_sharing
memops.
Signed-off-by: Tamas K Lengyel tkleng...@sec.in.tum.de
---
xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_sharing.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_sharing.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_sharing.c
index
On 29.05.15 at 11:37, tkleng...@sec.in.tum.de wrote:
The sharing vm_event ring being enabled is not necessary for mem_sharing
memops.
If indeed so, why would the same not apply to mem_paging memops?
Jan
___
Xen-devel mailing list
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Jan Beulich jbeul...@suse.com wrote:
On 29.05.15 at 11:37, tkleng...@sec.in.tum.de wrote:
The sharing vm_event ring being enabled is not necessary for mem_sharing
memops.
If indeed so, why would the same not apply to mem_paging memops?
Jan
The ring
