On 05/01/17 17:17, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> On 1/5/17 11:08 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 05.01.17 at 17:26, wrote:
>>> -static void set_fixed_range(int msr, int * changed, unsigned int *
>>> msrwords)
>>> +static void set_fixed_range(int msr, bool * changed, unsigned int *
>>> msrwords)
>> Wou
On 1/5/17 11:08 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.01.17 at 17:26, wrote:
>> -static void set_fixed_range(int msr, int * changed, unsigned int * msrwords)
>> +static void set_fixed_range(int msr, bool * changed, unsigned int *
>> msrwords)
>
> Would have been nice to get the stray blanks here and
>>> On 05.01.17 at 17:26, wrote:
> -static void set_fixed_range(int msr, int * changed, unsigned int * msrwords)
> +static void set_fixed_range(int msr, bool * changed, unsigned int * msrwords)
Would have been nice to get the stray blanks here and elsewhere
dropped, as the lines are being touched
On 05/01/17 16:26, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> Instead of using an int and providing a define for TRUE and FALSE,
> change the code to use stdbool that Xen provides.
>
> Signed-off-by: Doug Goldstein
Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper and queued
___
Xen-devel mai
Instead of using an int and providing a define for TRUE and FALSE,
change the code to use stdbool that Xen provides.
Signed-off-by: Doug Goldstein
---
xen/arch/x86/cpu/mtrr/generic.c | 21 +++--
xen/arch/x86/cpu/mtrr/mtrr.h| 5 -
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 15 del
