On 12/02/16 10:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 12.02.16 at 11:50, wrote:
>> On 12/02/16 10:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 12.02.16 at 11:02, wrote:
On 12/02/16 10:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 12.02.16 at 10:51, wrote:
>> On 12/02/16 08:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 11.02.1
>>> On 12.02.16 at 11:50, wrote:
> On 12/02/16 10:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 12.02.16 at 11:02, wrote:
>>> On 12/02/16 10:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 12.02.16 at 10:51, wrote:
> On 12/02/16 08:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 11.02.16 at 20:25, wrote:
>>> CentOS 7 gets int
On 12/02/16 10:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 12.02.16 at 11:02, wrote:
>> On 12/02/16 10:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 12.02.16 at 10:51, wrote:
On 12/02/16 08:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 11.02.16 at 20:25, wrote:
>> CentOS 7 gets into trouble when compiling Xen citing:
>
>>> On 12.02.16 at 11:02, wrote:
> On 12/02/16 10:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 12.02.16 at 10:51, wrote:
>>> On 12/02/16 08:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 11.02.16 at 20:25, wrote:
> CentOS 7 gets into trouble when compiling Xen citing:
>
> flushtlb.c: Assembler messages:
>>>
On 12/02/16 10:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 12.02.16 at 10:51, wrote:
>> On 12/02/16 08:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 11.02.16 at 20:25, wrote:
CentOS 7 gets into trouble when compiling Xen citing:
flushtlb.c: Assembler messages:
flushtlb.c:149: Error: value of 256 to
>>> On 12.02.16 at 10:51, wrote:
> On 12/02/16 08:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 11.02.16 at 20:25, wrote:
>>> CentOS 7 gets into trouble when compiling Xen citing:
>>>
>>> flushtlb.c: Assembler messages:
>>> flushtlb.c:149: Error: value of 256 too large for field of 1 bytes at 1
>>>
>>> The
On 12/02/16 08:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 11.02.16 at 20:25, wrote:
>> CentOS 7 gets into trouble when compiling Xen citing:
>>
>> flushtlb.c: Assembler messages:
>> flushtlb.c:149: Error: value of 256 too large for field of 1 bytes at 1
>>
>> The line number is wrong, and the error messag
On 12/02/16 08:13, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 11.02.16 at 20:41, wrote:
>> On 11/02/16 19:25, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/flushtlb.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/flushtlb.c
>>> @@ -141,10 +141,10 @@ void flush_area_local(const void *va, unsigned int
>>> flags)
>>> {
>>>
>>> On 11.02.16 at 20:25, wrote:
> CentOS 7 gets into trouble when compiling Xen citing:
>
> flushtlb.c: Assembler messages:
> flushtlb.c:149: Error: value of 256 too large for field of 1 bytes at 1
>
> The line number is wrong, and the error message not helpful. It turns out
> that the int
>>> On 11.02.16 at 20:41, wrote:
> On 11/02/16 19:25, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/flushtlb.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/flushtlb.c
>> @@ -141,10 +141,10 @@ void flush_area_local(const void *va, unsigned int
>> flags)
>> {
>> alternative(ASM_NOP3, "sfence", X86_FEAT
On 2/11/16 1:25 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> CentOS 7 gets into trouble when compiling Xen citing:
>
> flushtlb.c: Assembler messages:
> flushtlb.c:149: Error: value of 256 too large for field of 1 bytes at 1
>
> The line number is wrong, and the error message not helpful. It turns out
> that
On 11/02/16 19:25, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> CentOS 7 gets into trouble when compiling Xen citing:
>
> flushtlb.c: Assembler messages:
> flushtlb.c:149: Error: value of 256 too large for field of 1 bytes at 1
>
> The line number is wrong, and the error message not helpful. It turns out
> that the
CentOS 7 gets into trouble when compiling Xen citing:
flushtlb.c: Assembler messages:
flushtlb.c:149: Error: value of 256 too large for field of 1 bytes at 1
The line number is wrong, and the error message not helpful. It turns out
that the intermediate generated assembly was
# 139 "arch/
13 matches
Mail list logo
