On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 01:34:59PM +, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 19/02/16 13:08, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > I originally set out to rename paravirt_enabled() to paravirt_legacy()
> > but we instead decided to remove paravirt_enabled() completely. Although
> > I have some linker table work
On 19/02/16 13:08, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> I originally set out to rename paravirt_enabled() to paravirt_legacy()
> but we instead decided to remove paravirt_enabled() completely. Although
> I have some linker table work which will help make this cleaner, instead
> of waiting for that to go in,
I originally set out to rename paravirt_enabled() to paravirt_legacy()
but we instead decided to remove paravirt_enabled() completely. Although
I have some linker table work which will help make this cleaner, instead
of waiting for that to go in, just remove the known cases that should
be safe for
