Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 01/14] fuzz/x86_emulate: Remove redundant AFL hook

On 22/09/17 16:47, George Dunlap wrote: On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote: On 25/08/17 17:43, George Dunlap wrote: You don't need __AFL_INIT if you have __AFL_LOOP. Signed-off-by: George Dunlap Really? Is that covered

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 01/14] fuzz/x86_emulate: Remove redundant AFL hook

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 25/08/17 17:43, George Dunlap wrote: >> You don't need __AFL_INIT if you have __AFL_LOOP. >> >> Signed-off-by: George Dunlap > > Really? Is that covered in any documentation? > > I

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 01/14] fuzz/x86_emulate: Remove redundant AFL hook

Ping? I realize this isn't a major feature but it would be nice to get it in for 4.10. -George On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 11:34 AM, George Dunlap wrote: > On 08/25/2017 06:37 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> On 25/08/17 17:43, George Dunlap wrote: >>> You don't need

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 01/14] fuzz/x86_emulate: Remove redundant AFL hook

On 08/25/2017 06:37 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 25/08/17 17:43, George Dunlap wrote: >> You don't need __AFL_INIT if you have __AFL_LOOP. >> >> Signed-off-by: George Dunlap > > Really? Is that covered in any documentation? > > I got the contrary impression from

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 01/14] fuzz/x86_emulate: Remove redundant AFL hook

On 25/08/17 17:43, George Dunlap wrote: > You don't need __AFL_INIT if you have __AFL_LOOP. > > Signed-off-by: George Dunlap Really? Is that covered in any documentation? I got the contrary impression from whichever version of AFL I was using when I put this in, and a

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 01/14] fuzz/x86_emulate: Remove redundant AFL hook

You don't need __AFL_INIT if you have __AFL_LOOP. Signed-off-by: George Dunlap --- CC: Ian Jackson CC: Wei Liu CC: Andrew Cooper CC: Jan Beulich ---