Hi,
On 19/06/17 17:53, Bhupinder Thakur wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> On 19 June 2017 at 15:03, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> Hi Bhupinder,
>>
>> I think the commit message is a bit misleading.
>> Actually you *rename* functions and their call sites, and also this
>> touches the
Hi Andre,
On 19 June 2017 at 15:03, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Hi Bhupinder,
>
> I think the commit message is a bit misleading.
> Actually you *rename* functions and their call sites, and also this
> touches the VGIC code, so shouldn't it mention both in the first line of
>
Hi Bhupinder,
I think the commit message is a bit misleading.
Actually you *rename* functions and their call sites, and also this
touches the VGIC code, so shouldn't it mention both in the first line of
the commit message? After all this patch really has not much to do with
vpl011.
On 06/06/17
Hi Bhupinder,
On 06/06/17 18:25, Bhupinder Thakur wrote:
-/* N-bit register helpers */
-#define VGIC_REG_HELPERS(sz, offmask) \
-static inline register_t vgic_reg##sz##_extract(uint##sz##_t reg, \
-const
This patch redefines the vgic_reg* access functions to vreg_reg* functions.
These are generic functions, which will be used by the vgic emulation code
to access the vgic registers.
PL011 emulation code will also use vreg_reg* access functions.
Signed-off-by: Bhupinder Thakur
This patch redefines the vgic_reg* access functions to vreg_reg* functions.
These are generic functions, which will be used by the vgic emulation code
to access the vgic registers.
PL011 emulation code will also use vreg_reg* access functions.
Signed-off-by: Bhupinder Thakur