On 7/12/2016 3:49 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 12/07/16 11:38, Corneliu ZUZU wrote:
On 7/12/2016 1:22 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 12/07/16 11:11, Corneliu ZUZU wrote:
If you are really feeling up to it, having a common xen/atomic.h
with
typedef struct { int counter; } atomic_t;
#define ATOMIC_
On 12/07/16 11:38, Corneliu ZUZU wrote:
> On 7/12/2016 1:22 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 12/07/16 11:11, Corneliu ZUZU wrote:
>> If you are really feeling up to it, having a common xen/atomic.h
>> with
>>
>> typedef struct { int counter; } atomic_t;
>> #define ATOMIC_INIT(i) {
On 7/12/2016 1:22 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 12/07/16 11:11, Corneliu ZUZU wrote:
If you are really feeling up to it, having a common xen/atomic.h with
typedef struct { int counter; } atomic_t;
#define ATOMIC_INIT(i) { (i) }
and some prototypes such as:
static inline int atomic_read(const at
On 7/12/2016 1:22 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 12/07/16 11:11, Corneliu ZUZU wrote:
If you are really feeling up to it, having a common xen/atomic.h with
typedef struct { int counter; } atomic_t;
#define ATOMIC_INIT(i) { (i) }
and some prototypes such as:
static inline int atomic_read(const at
On 12/07/16 11:11, Corneliu ZUZU wrote:
>
>>
If you are really feeling up to it, having a common xen/atomic.h with
typedef struct { int counter; } atomic_t;
#define ATOMIC_INIT(i) { (i) }
and some prototypes such as:
static inline int atomic_read(const atomic
On 7/12/2016 12:42 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 12/07/16 06:11, Corneliu ZUZU wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On 7/11/2016 6:18 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 09/07/16 05:12, Corneliu ZUZU wrote:
This wouldn't let me make a param of a function that used
atomic_read() const.
Signed-off-by: Corneliu ZUZU
This
On 12/07/16 06:11, Corneliu ZUZU wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On 7/11/2016 6:18 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 09/07/16 05:12, Corneliu ZUZU wrote:
>>> This wouldn't let me make a param of a function that used
>>> atomic_read() const.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Corneliu ZUZU
>> This is a good improvement,
Hi Andrew,
On 7/11/2016 6:18 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 09/07/16 05:12, Corneliu ZUZU wrote:
This wouldn't let me make a param of a function that used atomic_read() const.
Signed-off-by: Corneliu ZUZU
This is a good improvement, but you must make an identical adjustment to
the arm code, oth
On 09/07/16 05:12, Corneliu ZUZU wrote:
> This wouldn't let me make a param of a function that used atomic_read() const.
>
> Signed-off-by: Corneliu ZUZU
This is a good improvement, but you must make an identical adjustment to
the arm code, otherwise you will end up with subtle build failures.
I
This wouldn't let me make a param of a function that used atomic_read() const.
Signed-off-by: Corneliu ZUZU
---
xen/include/asm-x86/atomic.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/atomic.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/atomic.h
index d246b70..0b250c8
10 matches
Mail list logo